Wick Stick
Well-Known Member
It seems like some pious Rabbi did the math, realized that it added up so that he lived through the flood, and decided to make a... correction?The thing about Methuselah is interesting. What happened?
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
It seems like some pious Rabbi did the math, realized that it added up so that he lived through the flood, and decided to make a... correction?The thing about Methuselah is interesting. What happened?
So much for inerrancy. - LOLIt seems like some pious Rabbi did the math, realized that it added up so that he lived through the flood, and decided to make a... correction?
![]()
It's kind of crazy to me how far some people go with inerrancy. Even the New Testament tells us to ignore the genealogies... if Paul didn't believe them, why are modern churches going to bat for them?So much for inerrancy. - LOL
Consider what I said about His aiding us to salvation by means of His propitiation sacrifice the same as in Hebrews 2, where He aids to salvation the children God has given Him and what you said.Is this the pathway to salvation that you understand and believe?
Joe
Yes.It's kind of crazy to me how far some people go with inerrancy.
Before the fastballs start coming, I’ll just ask: who agrees with me that filling in Scriptural blanks is in invitation to indulge our biases?
How have these gaps in scripture been filled in by Jesus in modern times?Many, myself included, believe that the gaps in Scripture, brought about by natural causes and supernatural will, have been filled in by Jesus in modern times.
Dear Scott Downey,Consider what I said about His aiding us to salvation by means of His propitiation sacrifice the same as in Hebrews 2, where He aids to salvation the children God has given Him and what you said.
The elect must believe, and is also the reason why Paul says he labors. So yes pray that the Lord sends laborers into His field which is the world as that is where His elect are born. No one is born saved. Paul labors so that the elect obtain salvation by believing.
2 Timothy 2:10
Therefore I endure all things for the sake of the elect, that they also may obtain the salvation which is in Christ Jesus with eternal glory.
Hebrews 2
10 For it was fitting for Him, for whom are all things and by whom are all things, in bringing many sons to glory, to make the captain of their salvation perfect through sufferings. 11 For both He who [g]sanctifies and those who are being sanctified are all of one, for which reason He is not ashamed to call them brethren, 12 saying:
“I will declare Your name to My brethren;
In the midst of the assembly I will sing praise to You.”
13 And again:
“I will put My trust in Him.”
And again:
“Here am I and the children whom God has given Me.”
14 Inasmuch then as the children have partaken of flesh and blood, He Himself likewise shared in the same, that through death He might destroy him who had the power of death, that is, the devil, 15 and release those who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage. 16 For indeed He does not [h]give aid to angels, but He does [i]give aid to the seed of Abraham.
17 Therefore, in all things He had to be made like His brethren, that He might be a merciful and faithful High Priest in things pertaining to God, to make propitiation for the sins of the people. 18 For in that He Himself has suffered, being [j]tempted, He is able to aid those who are tempted.
How have these gaps in scripture been filled in by Jesus in modern times?
Did Jesus answer the question about Methuselah? (see the OP, post #1)
It's fascinating isn't it when we consider Peter's declaration that a. a 1000 years is as one day...Inserting here an old post of mine on this subject:
Could it be this is where @bbyrd009 [alas this blessing man in no longer among us] got the idea of 969 being involved?
"And all the days of Methuselah were nine hundred sixty and nine years: and he died." Gen 5:27
The oldest man listed in the Bible came short of the one thousand years. But, none of those including Methuselah is seen at that time to have the option:
"And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. Believest thou this?" John 11:26
Everyone before Jesus brought Life was dead. The 1,000 years may speak of the promise of unending Life reigning with Christ because we have become like him:
"Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is." I John 3:2
"Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years." Rev 20:6
No one of 969 years or less has had the Life which Jesus is until he has taken hold of the Life that Jesus brought. This was the unredeemed flesh of men, the bit of earth of which each man is composed, the old man with his ways, not the new man with God's Way:
"The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy: I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly." John 10:10
Paul didn't say ignore genealogies in the Bible, he was meaning to avoid arguing over which tribe someone belonged to. Barnes' Notes on 1 Timothy 1:4 says:It's kind of crazy to me how far some people go with inerrancy. Even the New Testament tells us to ignore the genealogies... if Paul didn't believe them, why are modern churches going to bat for them?
Titus 3:9 Avoid foolish questions, and genealogies, and contentions, and strivings about the law
1Timothy 1:4 Neither give heed to fables and endless genealogies, which minister questions, rather than godly edifying
ok for much except for a final universal salvation at the very end of this world for all who are in Adam or human beings.Dear Scott Downey,
You said:
The elect must believe, and is also the reason why Paul says he labors. So yes pray that the Lord sends laborers into His field which is the world as that is where His elect are born. No one is born saved. Paul labors so that the elect obtain salvation by believing.
I agree - the Elect are not born saved. However, the Elect are born "chosen" to be saved before they die. To be saved, Christ will do 100% of the work of saving the Elect. Included in this work, Christ will cause bondservants like Paul to help bring in His harvest.
Also, the Elect believer has no works to perform to save themselves. Yes, the person will make a confession of faith but that confession is a result of the spiritual work that Christ did within the person. The person cannot take credit for their confession. When they do, they are stealing from Christ.
In the final age, the balance of mankind will be cast into the Lake of Fire (not literal fire, it is a symbol for Christ's judgment) where they will be judged by the Law. Under the Law, the penalty of sin is death. However, before the "lost" perish from this judgment, Christ will have MERCY upon each person. His mercy will come to them in the form of the Early and Latter Rains of the Spirit which will give them FAITH. Because of the faith that the Spirit gives them, Christ will appear to the person and complete their conversion. The result will be the birth of a new child of God who will be gathered up to heaven. The child of the Devil will remain in the Lake of Fire until he perishes. This death will satisfy JUSTICE.
By the end of the final age, all who have died in Adam will be made alive in Christ. This result happens solely because it is God's "will" for it to happen. To accomplish His "will", God the Father sent Christ into the world to save us.
These verses apply:
1John 4:14 And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the world.
Rom 5:18 so then as it was by one offence towards all men to condemnation, so by one righteousness towards all men for justification of life. 19 For as indeed by the disobedience of the one man the many have been constituted sinners, so also by the obedience of the one the many will be constituted righteous.
Phi 2:10 That at the name of Jesus every knee shall bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth; 11 and that every tongue shall confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.
1Tim 2:3 For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Savior; 4 who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth. 5 For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; 6 who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time.
Joe
May we assume that if they had not eaten of the forbidden fruit, they would have lived on to that 1000 year mark or and then eating of the Tree of Life...they would simply have lived on...?It's fascinating isn't it when we consider Peter's declaration that a. a 1000 years is as one day...
b. No one lived beyond 1000 years and
c. The Lord said to Adam, "In the day you eat thereof, you shall surely die".
Here’s an example: Did Methuselah die in the Great Flood? Gen. 7:6 tells us that Noah was 600 years old at the time of the flood. That means his dad Lamech, who was 182 at Noah’s birth, Gen. 5:28, was born 782 years before the flood. Coincidentally (or perhaps not coincidentally) Methuselah lived 782 years after Lamech was born, Gen. 5:26. So Methuselah died in the year of the flood. But IN the flood? We don’t know.
They had the opportunity to prefect character and learn to trust God. That tree of life would have ensured their immortality regardless of their eating of the other fruit, which is why God had to turf them out of the garden...May we assume that if they had not eaten of the forbidden fruit, they would have lived on to that 1000 year mark or and then eating of the Tree of Life...they would simply have lived on...?
Even so...They had the opportunity to prefect character and learn to trust God. That tree of life would have ensured their immortality regardless of their eating of the other fruit, which is why God had to turf them out of the garden...
“22 And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever: 23 Therefore the LORD God sent him forth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence he was taken. 24 So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life. ”
Genesis 3:22-24 KJV
Which is why there can be no immortal sinner suffering for eternity in hell. The tree of life even in glory will be the food for eternal health for the redeemed, but there is no access to that tree for the wicked.
Age is telling on me these days. My wife has some health issues but she remains more active than me. I have no major complaints. We live with our daughter and she looks after us. I look into this forum regularly although I post very little anymore. Hopefully you and yours are doing well.By the way, how are you @amadeus my friend. I hope all is well with you and your family.
I think the standard workaround for this is to consider eternal conscious torment to be eternal death as compared to eternal life.Even so...