Yes….GOD ORDERED those things….it was not commanded by men, but by the Creator himself. He alone has authority to take life and he alone can restore it. Again I refer you to Abraham’s conversation with God over the wicked cities of Sodom and Gomorrah…..there were no righteous people in those cities and children raised in that environment would turn out to be just like their wicked parents…..do you think God is unrighteous or unjust? Seriously?God ordered Israel to kill whole cities- men women and children.
Children could have been rescued and retaught according to your philosophy, but God ordered even babies slaughtered!
God has a purpose in allowing human rulership as it has already been explained….human rulers have failed miserably to protect to their peoples from foreign invaders…..some of the most disgusting conquerers were just bloodthirsty murderers….greedy for land and resources and addicted to bloodshed and driven by national pride.God gives orders to even evil government (like when He had Caiaphas prophecy) to protect civilian lives from a conquerer
God’s own people had to defend their God-given land against those who wanted it for themselves……
When did Israel ever offensively conquer anyone’s else’s land without God’s sanction? The bloodshed was from the foreign invaders, attempting to steal what was not theirs, and to kill anyone who tried to defend their own property.
Do you put the wars of the nations in that category? If so, who was defending a land that was “God-given”?….and what sanction did God give to the conquerors to shed blood in the process?
Stealing and murder are against the Ten Commandments….
I already provided evidence for the fact that the early Christians could not even entertain military service as it was totally incompatible with Christian teachings. Did you ignore those too?Well show me one place where Jesus condemned a Roman Soldier for being a soldier, or Paul or Peter or John or James for that matter.
When I went to look up this word you defined….“Diaselo”…..this is what Strongs said….Luke 3:14
And the soldiers likewise demanded of him, saying, And what shall we do? And he said unto them, Do violence to no man, neither accuse any falsely; and be content with your wages.
And before you point out violence- it is the greek word Diaselo and means to terrify by extortion. It is not killing in war.
”There are no concordance results for "Diaselo" in the KJV.”
So where did this come from?
Luke 3:14 is not rendered that way in other translations….
ESV….“Soldiers also asked him, “And we, what shall we do?” And he said to them, “Do not extort money from anyone by threats or by false accusation, and be content with your wages.”
NASB….”Some soldiers were questioning him, saying, “And what about us, what shall we do?” And he said to them, “Do not take money from anyone by force, or accuse anyone falsely, and be content with your wages.”
NCB…”Some soldiers also asked him, “What about us? What should we do?” He replied, “Do not extort money from anyone, do not falsely accuse or threaten anyone, and be satisfied with your wages.”
The KJV is a most unreliable translation, not only for its archaic English which makes it very difficult for new Bible students to read and understand the Scriptures, but it’s renderings are not accurate and often contradictory.
For that reason, it’s one I avoid, preferring to use a variety of translations along with a good concordance so that modern linguistics determines the meaning of scripture in their original languages more accurately than an out dated dinosaur in this 21st century.
In answer to this statement you said….From the perspective of a Christian, no one is justified in taking innocent lives...period. No government can demand that from any person who identifies as a “Christian”. You own conscience is God-given and should never be violated……the purpose of military training is to deaden the conscience….and dehumanize the enemy…should a Christian ever be part of that training to kill a fellow human to whom God also gave life?
”I agree with your conscinece statement.
But you are vomiting the Watchtower lies about teh purpose of military training. It is to train a civilian to become a soldier. Though it is decaying rapidly, the western nations always taught its armies todo what could be done to avoid taking civilian lives.”
So you agreed that our conscience should be our guide…..but then justified the mass killing of innocent civilians as if that alone was not sufficient to violate a “Christian” conscience.
Since history attests to the fact that the early Christians did not in fact take up, or continue military service, no amount of training to dehumanize an enemy would make them violate their God-given, Bible trained conscience. We are told by Christ to ”love our enemies and to pray for them” (Matt 5:43-44)…..where in that statement do you find sanction to unleash weapons of mass destruction to indiscriminately kill any perceived enemy?
What the world under Satan is doing, has nothing to do with us. We can “let go and let God” as the saying goes. He does not need us to fulfill his purpose….he can maneuver whomever he chooses to carry out his will and purpose.…even his enemies.
Ah, so here we have another ‘loner’ who decides for themselves what they will, and won’t believe…?From the bible itself. I do not need a human organization to filter what I am to think or believe.
Are we at liberty to pick and choose our beliefs?
Christians need a brotherhood, with whom they are to meet regularly…(Heb 10:24-25) Likewise those Christians who meet together are not to hold differing views as if they can pick and choose what to believe….they must be united in their faith and have no divisions. (1 Cor 1:10) Where does that leave Christendom and the “lone rangers”?
And you are exposed as a fraud….contradicting yourself and fooling yourself into believing that your views are in accord with the teachings of the one you claim as your “Lord”…..if your conscience is not Bible trained, but more in line with the world’s view of life and death, it shows up in what you yourself express.So now you stand corrected and properly informed.
Do you stand corrected? Or can you be?
Last edited: