CadyandZoe
Well-Known Member
He did clearly tell you.The Lord is not an author of confusion by speaking of two comings for us without clearly telling us.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
He did clearly tell you.The Lord is not an author of confusion by speaking of two comings for us without clearly telling us.
Resurrection is when someone, such as Jesus, is risen from the dead. The Rapture involves resurrection from the dead for those who are "dead in Christ" and it also involves the transportation of Jesus' followers to meet Jesus in the air.so why do you believe the first resurrection of Rev 20 involves a physical resurrection in order to escape coming into judgment?
Jn 5
24 “I assure you and most solemnly say to you, the person who hears My word [the one who heeds My message], and believes and trusts in Him who sent Me, has (possesses now) eternal life [that is, eternal life actually begins—the believer is transformed], and does not come into judgment and condemnation, but has passed [over] from death into life.
Apparently, you don't understand what John meant by "first resurrection." The passage mentions two resurrections: verse 4 discusses the first resurrection, and verse 13 discusses the second resurrection.Right. Good point.
Revelation 20:6 Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years.
This verse suggests that having part in the first resurrection is the way that someone avoids the second death, which is being cast into the lake of fire (Rev 20:14-15), and the way that the second death has no power over you. So, does a person need to physically die and wait until they are bodily resurrected in order for the second death to not have any power over them? Premil would have to answer yes to that question based on their interpretation of this verse.
But, we know that even NOW the second death has no power over us (Christians) and certainly no power over the souls of the dead in Christ in heaven now. So, we need to interpret Revelation 20 in light of all this, but premils don't do that. That's why Premil contradicts so much scripture. It tries to make the rest of scripture fit with its interpretation of Revelation 20 instead of the other way around. So, their approach to interpreting Revelation 20 is very faulty.
Was Paul unaware of Jesus' teaching concerning his second coming to set up a kingdom on earth?Was Paul not aware of Jesus supposedly coming down to the earth at His second coming? I would say no one was more knowledgeable than Paul about Christ's second coming. Yet, he said nothing anywhere in all his letters about Jesus being on the earth after His second coming. Did he just somehow forget that detail or did he know that isn't going to happen? I would vote for the latter.
Which you are completely unable to prove. Your lack of ability to back up your claims convincingly is very evident, so there is no reason for anyone to take you seriously.The scripture you believe is symbolic, isn't symbolic.
Spritual Israelite said:Do you believe that someone can avoid the second death without having part in the first resurrection?
Agree! We might be finally getting somewhere with you!Yes, by being a Christian.
Doug, you're back to lying again. We discuss Daniel 9:24-27 quite a bit. You can't possibly have missed that. Also, we talk a lot about the NT time period which I believe is symbolically represented by the 42 months, 1260 days and time, times and half a time references. Just because i don't obsess over time frames like you do doesn't mean I ignore those time frames. I simply do not interpret them the way you do. So, stop lying about Amil as if we ignore those time frames because we don't. Lying about Amil only makes you look like you have nothing to support your own doctrine, so you have to resort to lying about the opposing doctrine instead since that's all you have to offer.I observe that Amil never talks about any of these end times time frames, even metaphorically. It is because Amil is an unworkable, irrational view.
I already told you. Is "the truth of scripture" too vague for you? This thread teaches the truth that the pretrib doctrine is false and also happens to teach that amil is true at the same time. There are plenty of lurkers out there who are undecided about these things and trying to learn about it.What do you think this thread teaches lurkers?
Where did Jesus teach that? And why are you unwilling to answer my question as to why Paul made no mention of Jesus coming to the earth? Are you afraid to answer that question?Was Paul unaware of Jesus' teaching concerning his second coming to set up a kingdom on earth?
Apparently, you are not willing to do ANYTHING to back up any of your claims. What a waste of time it is to talk to you. Shame on me for even bothering to do so.Apparently, you don't understand what John meant by "first resurrection." The passage mentions two resurrections: verse 4 discusses the first resurrection, and verse 13 discusses the second resurrection.
But, you are pre-trib in the sense that you believe the rapture will occur before "the great tribulation", so as far as I'm concerned you should be lumped in with the rest of the pre-tribs with the understanding that we don't all have the exact same understanding of what the tribulation entails.The pre-trib view is based on the trib being the 7 year 70th week of Daniel 9:27. Pre-trib adherents consider the prince that shall come of Daniel 9:26 as being the Antichrist person who will confirm a peace treaty involving Israel and surrounding middle east nations.
Part of the reason for the Pre-trib belief the covenant will be a peace treaty is that in Daniel 8:25, the little horn person (the same person as the prince that shall come) destroys many by peace.
-------------------------------------------
I don't agree with these three aspects of the pre-trib view.
1. is that the 7 years will not all be tribulation. For most of the first half the world will be saying "peace and safety".
2. is that the covenant to be confirmed for 7 years is not a peace treaty, but the Mt. Sinai covenant. The requirement to confirm the Mt. Sinai covenant on a 7 year cycle was established by Moses in Deuteronomy 31:9-13.
3. is that I disagree with the pre-trib view that the rapture must happen before the 70th week begins.
When they say peace and safety it is after the tribulation. That is the 6th seal coming of Jesus. They say peace and safety because they see the great tribulation is over, only to be cast into the 7th seal wrath of God.The pre-trib view is based on the trib being the 7 year 70th week of Daniel 9:27. Pre-trib adherents consider the prince that shall come of Daniel 9:26 as being the Antichrist person who will confirm a peace treaty involving Israel and surrounding middle east nations.
Part of the reason for the Pre-trib belief the covenant will be a peace treaty is that in Daniel 8:25, the little horn person (the same person as the prince that shall come) destroys many by peace.
-------------------------------------------
I don't agree with these three aspects of the pre-trib view.
1. is that the 7 years will not all be tribulation. For most of the first half the world will be saying "peace and safety".
2. is that the covenant to be confirmed for 7 years is not a peace treaty, but the Mt. Sinai covenant. The requirement to confirm the Mt. Sinai covenant on a 7 year cycle was established by Moses in Deuteronomy 31:9-13.
I agree with you here because Noah is in the ark 6 days before the flood and not 7.3. is that I disagree with the pre-trib view that the rapture must happen before the 70th week begins.
I agree with you in general. However, I wish to know how your POV informed your response to my post concerning logic and reason.
But, you are pre-trib in the sense that you believe the rapture will occur before "the great tribulation", so as far as I'm concerned you should be lumped in with the rest of the pre-tribs with the understanding that we don't all have the exact same understanding of what the tribulation entails.
Pre-trib involves believing that the rapture will occur some time before a time of great tribulation and before the second coming of Christ rather than at the same time of His second coming and that is what you believe.
we don't all have the exact same understanding of what the tribulation entails.
You said "in brief", so I will try to make it brief.What do YOU believe in brief…
1) the Purpose of the Last Days Tribulations?
2) Where it comes From?
3) What the Last Days Tribulations “entails” ?
Thanks.
Glory to GOD,
Taken
Your challenge earlier to Doug that there are no "after effects"Do you expect anyone to actually know what you are intending to say here? If so, how?
You started good showing us a rapture of the Church in 1 Thessalonians 4:14-5. The only problem is, we all believe that. That is not even the issue. You couldn't get any further than that in 1 Thessalonians 4:14-5. That is because:
Your doctrine immediately falls apart at the starting blocks. falls apart.
- There is no ushering the Church into heaven in 1 Thessalonians 4:14-5:9.
- There is no 7-year tribulation in 1 Thessalonians 4:14-5:9.
- There is no 3rd coming in 1 Thessalonians 4:14-5:9.
- There are no survivors in 1 Thessalonians 4:14-5. None shall escape.
Because you have nothing there, you started gerrymandering other Scripture in order to somehow present some semblance of biblical merit.
We all agree with Romans 1 that "the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness." So, how does that prove Pretrib? It does not!
You randomly quote Revelation 11 without any exegesis. What does that prove? Where is your rapture here? Where is your seven year tribulation here? Where is your third coming here? Nowhere to be seen! The shows the impotence of your position! You have nothing!
I never once said that you should not voice your personal opinion on your personal relationship with the Lord anywhere. Why would I do that? I was cutting across your insults, slights, and ad hominem. I was telling you to keep that away from this thread. I stand by that.
So, it seems like you have nothing to support your position. You reinforce the Op. This is obviously a man-made doctrine that is cobbled together through manipulating Scripture.
Where in the Bible does it teach that "Antichrist ... will confirm a peace treaty involving Israel and surrounding middle east nations"?The pre-trib view is based on the trib being the 7 year 70th week of Daniel 9:27. Pre-trib adherents consider the prince that shall come of Daniel 9:26 as being the Antichrist person who will confirm a peace treaty involving Israel and surrounding middle east nations.
Part of the reason for the Pre-trib belief the covenant will be a peace treaty is that in Daniel 8:25, the little horn person (the same person as the prince that shall come) destroys many by peace.
-------------------------------------------
I don't agree with these three aspects of the pre-trib view.
1. is that the 7 years will not all be tribulation. For most of the first half the world will be saying "peace and safety".
2. is that the covenant to be confirmed for 7 years is not a peace treaty, but the Mt. Sinai covenant. The requirement to confirm the Mt. Sinai covenant on a 7 year cycle was established by Moses in Deuteronomy 31:9-13.
3. is that I disagree with the pre-trib view that the rapture must happen before the 70th week begins.
This is all your own opinions. When multiple Scripture has been submitted to you, you dismiss it, rubbish it and reject it. Your fight is with the Word of God not with Posttribbers.Your challenge earlier to Doug that there are no "after effects"
QUOTE
"There are no survivors in 1 Thessalonians 4:14-5. None shall escape."
Where in eschatology are there no survivors?
2nd coming?...nope
Rapture? Nope
Gathering of the Jews? Nope.
What does your doctrine say?
You said "in brief", so I will try to make it brief.
Answering your questions in order...
1) For God to get people to make their final decisions on who they want to follow (Christ or Satan) because the time is short.
2) I'm not sure what this question means exactly, but I would say it comes about by God loosing the restraint He had placed on Satan and wickedness during the New Testament era (2 Thessalonians 2:6-8, Revelation 20:7-9). That restraint had to do with the preaching of the gospel through the power of the Holy Spirit during NT times which made a huge impact on the world compared to OT times. I believe God will allow the preaching of the gospel to largely go ignored during that time which will result in increased wickedness. I think we are likely living during that time already now. If not, then we seem to be quickly approaching it. I'll stop there or this will no longer be a brief response.
3) To me, it's about spiritual tribulation involving significantly increased deception, wickedness and persecution along with a mass falling away from the faith. This is based on scriptures like Matthew 24:10-13, Matthew 24:23-26, 2 Thessalonians 2:1-12, 1 Timothy 4:1-3, Revelation 16:12-16 and Revelation 20:7-9. As an Amil I refer to that time period as "Satan's little season".