grafted branch
Well-Known Member
So then is that the verse in Daniel that is being used for the sign of the Son of man coming to earth or is there another verse in Daniel that points to Jesus coming back to earth with clouds?yes it is.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
So then is that the verse in Daniel that is being used for the sign of the Son of man coming to earth or is there another verse in Daniel that points to Jesus coming back to earth with clouds?yes it is.
Yes Jesus was coming on the clouds of heaven not to earth so its not the sign of Matthew 24.Daniel 7:13 I saw in the night visions, and, behold, one like the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of days, and they brought him near before him.
Isn’t this verse telling us that the Son of man came with the clouds to the Father (Ancient of days)?
Absolutely agree, thanks for post that.Yes Jesus was coming on the clouds of heaven not to earth so its not the sign of Matthew 24.
This was also Jesus claiming to be God and the final act the brought His death.
Matthew 26
62 Then the high priest stood up and said to Jesus, “Are you not going to answer? What is this testimony that these men are bringing against you?” 63 But Jesus remained silent.
The high priest said to him, “I charge you under oath by the living God: Tell us if you are the Messiah, the Son of God.”
64 “You have said so,” Jesus replied. “But I say to all of you: From now on you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Mighty One and coming on the clouds of heaven.”[e]
65 Then the high priest tore his clothes and said, “He has spoken blasphemy! Why do we need any more witnesses? Look, now you have heard the blasphemy. 66 What do you think?”
“He is worthy of death,” they answered.
Jesus was claiming to be the one from Daniel 7:13.
What the Jews also didn't understand here was that the Messiah was also God. Jesus wasn't killed for claiming to be the Messiah Jesus was killed for claiming to be God.
So then is that the verse in Daniel that is being used for the sign of the Son of man coming to earth or is there another verse in Daniel that points to Jesus coming back to earth with clouds?
The quoted verse appears to me as Daniel seeing a seperate event to the second coming.....and perhaps I was a bit hasty in agreeing it was a description of the second coming. All that said, the language is similar to what the angels told the disciples at Jesus ascension ie, that Jesus would return in a similar fashion as they saw him go, namely with clouds.So then is that the verse in Daniel that is being used for the sign of the Son of man coming to earth or is there another verse in Daniel that points to Jesus coming back to earth with clouds?
I believe that Daniel 7:13 happened when Jesus ascended back up to heaven that's why Jesus stated "from now on" in Matthew 26:64The quoted verse appears to me as Daniel seeing a seperate event to the second coming.....and perhaps I was a bit hasty in agreeing it was a description of the second coming. All that said, the language is similar to what the angels told the disciples at Jesus ascension ie, that Jesus would return in a similar fashion as they saw him go, namely with clouds.
When I read this text in Daniel I see both even though what I see is strictly not accurate :)
In Matthew 24:30 Jesus says this (referring to his return)
'Then will appear the sign of the Son of Man in heaven. And then all the peoples of the earth will mourn when they see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven, with power and great glory'.
Ok, fair enough.The quoted verse appears to me as Daniel seeing a seperate event to the second coming.....and perhaps I was a bit hasty in agreeing it was a description of the second coming. All that said, the language is similar to what the angels told the disciples at Jesus ascension ie, that Jesus would return in a similar fashion as they saw him go, namely with clouds.
When I read this text in Daniel I see both even though what I see is strictly not accurate :)
In Matthew 24:30 Jesus says this (referring to his return)
'Then will appear the sign of the Son of Man in heaven. And then all the peoples of the earth will mourn when they see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven, with power and great glory'.
Your 'sign' Poll choices should have included one that said it is literal and already of the past, using symbolic language. Then I would have checked that choice.Matthew 24:30
And then shall appear the SIGN of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.
I think Jesus' explanations in using past events is to illustrate the unexpectedness of what will unfold for those who do not take his return seriously or are flippant about the instructions to 'stay awake'Ok, fair enough.
What are your thoughts on Luke 17:30-31 where it says the Son of man is revealed on the same day that they should flee? Do you think this revealing could be the sign of the Son of man in Matthew 24:30?
Alright, I know sometimes not everything seems to fit and we have to step back and not focus on the minor details.I think Jesus' explanations in using past events is to illustrate the unexpectedness of what will unfold for those who do not take his return seriously or are flippant about the instructions to 'stay awake'
One of the dangers in interpretation is to make what is intended as a generality, walk on all fours so to speak, and major on minors.
Discernment here is critical....which applies to your quoted Luke 17:30-31
I’m interested, what other thoughts do you have on this?Jesus, the Son Man responded to his disciples with dual meanings; it had to be this way for completeness. I believe they understood one meaning only. And it's ironic that the modern futurist since the 16th-17th century on only sees the other meaning and view.
I see both meanings in scripture, as the spirit drives me to this obvious conclusion.
My overall assessment is base on stakes, still a sturdy structure.
1. An Amillennialistic view. 2. A partial preterist view and 3., a symbolic language view. All important as Jesus used OT writers' symbolic language for a reason.
1. The 1st meaning for the disciples and the generation of Christ abt. 30 - 70 AD abt 40 years
2. The 2nd meaning, for today's and future interested parties...
I can elaborate more if someone might be interested.
Ok back to the dual meanings:I’m interested, what other thoughts do you have on this?
:)
Some do see it that way. I don't because it is not interpreted as such in the NT Scriptures. Everywhere in the NT, the Son of Man is viewed as coming from heaven to establish his Kingdom on earth. And if you look back at Dan 7, that is precisely why the Son of Man appeared before a court in heaven, to get his marching orders to establish his Kingdom upon the earth.Daniel 7:13 I saw in the night visions, and, behold, one like the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of days, and they brought him near before him.
Isn’t this verse telling us that the Son of man came with the clouds to the Father (Ancient of days)?
or one could say the presenting of the Son to the Father was his inauguration after his stint on Earth. After the inhabitants of God's Multiverse witnessed for themselves the heretofore unrevealed heart of God.....and thus nullifying all of Lucifer's misrepresentations......and what were those misrepresentations? Was it not that God is basically selfish? That everything he wanted he made?.....and nobody, not even God could prove otherwise.Some do see it that way. I don't because it is not interpreted as such in the NT Scriptures. Everywhere in the NT, the Son of Man is viewed as coming from heaven to establish his Kingdom on earth. And if you look back at Dan 7, that is precisely why the Son of Man appeared before a court in heaven, to get his marching orders to establish his Kingdom upon the earth.
What we have are two statements that exist separately and yet without contradiction.
1) Christ descends from heaven, meaning that he comes to the earth, establishing God's Kingdom here.
2) Christ appears before a heavenly court.
These two things are designed to show that Christ is authorized from heaven to establish God's Kingdom on the earth.
Dan 7.13 “In my vision at night I looked, and there before me was one like a son of man, coming with the clouds of heaven. He approached the Ancient of Days and was led into his presence. 14 He was given authority, glory and sovereign power; all nations and peoples of every language worshiped him. His dominion is an everlasting dominion that will not pass away, and his kingdom is one that will never be destroyed."
So I read the part about Christ's appearance before the court as parenthetical. The main act is Christ's descent from heaven. Parenthetically, it is explained that he comes with divine authorization, which originates from heaven.