GracePeace
Well-Known Member
It may need to be put to the test a bit before being accepted, but I think it's reasonable what @David in NJ is saying, and should be considered. I'm open to the idea that she was his bride upon drawing her first breath (possibly even before--she was already within him, though I'm uncertain it could be said there was already a consciousness she had), because it says "the man and his wife were naked and were unashamed".Let's look at this from the perspective of an adult with a fully formed frontal lobe and the ability to reason correctly.
"Who else was Adam going to marry?" is not anywhere near to being the same question as:
"Was Adam joined in holy matrimony to Eve as soon as she drew her first breath?"
When I did dot-to-dot puzzles, even as a child, it was not by joining every single dot to every other single dot that a beautiful image was revealed.
Bible study is both logical and spiritual, but it is not subject to any whim I might coincidentally conceive.
I'm sorry, Dave, but with all the brotherly love I can summon, I have to say that we've been down this road before, and it always reminds me all too much of a scene from The Pied Piper Of Hamelin. I'm in the church with the adults, and I'm not going to that cave.![]()
![]()
.
An argument against this would be that men are not "married" (one flesh with their wives), only affianced, until they consummate their marriages, but there're other similar ("becoming") rules that do not apply to Adam--he wasn't born out of a womb, and didn't grow up, but was formed as a fully grown man.
Whereas other men are not one flesh with their wives until consummation, Adam's wife was literally already his own body (as Paul says of husbands and wives--"for no man ever hated his own body"), so that standard might not have applied to him.
Are you even open to the idea? It seems reasonable doesn't it?
Last edited: