What is Trusting God, exactly?
Trusting God is believing every word that proceed out of the mouth of God. You can not trust in that which you don't know.
You can start knowing God by asking Him for His Spirit.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
What is Trusting God, exactly?
Dear Johnny B,
I don't know your full beliefs but I can agree with a good part of what you said. We are being created "in Christ". He is the New Man that grows in us. We are not currently saved in the full sense of the word. Mankind does have life because of Christ's sacifice on the cross but we do not have life more abundantly yet (John 10:10).
I have been crucified with Christ, it is no longer I that lives but Christ who lives in me (Galatians 2:20). We consider ourselves dead and made alive in Christ.No man has received that salvation yet. We can only receive it when we are resurrected and given the full measure of God's Spirit. At that point and that point only, we are saved in the full sense of the word. Christ is going to complete the salvation of each and every person who has ever iived. In this age, Christ will call "many" of us to Him.
Your doctrine has taken all responsibility from the individual, we are not required to do anything and we can look back and see what the patriarchs were required to do in obedience to God. Noah had to build the ark, Abraham left his country,etc. We can also learn of what happens to the person who is disobedient, Jonah was swallowed by a fish, David's son died, Saul's misfortunes, etc.If we are blessed, He will "choose" a "few" of us for His church (the first fruits of the havest) and He will cause us to spiritually mature and empower us through the Holy Spirit to remain faithful until we die. At that point, we have been made ready for His church and the Kingdom of Heaven. It is 100% the work of Christ. He is the cause of it all happening. If Christ does not choose us for His church, Christ will complete our salvation in the Lake of Fire age. No one will be lost. Judgment is a part of the salvation process. Everyone must be judged - His true church is judged now in this age and all others will be judged in the final age (Lake of Fire). Christ promised to call us all and save us all "to be testified in due time" (1Tim 2:4-6).
The whole point of Jesus coming here was to set up His Kingdom on earth, the Kingdom is here, within us, Luke 17:20-21.God's plan for creating many children "in Christ" is what scripture and this creation is all about. It takes many ages of time but God is in complete control and He is working all things (including evil and the harlot church that is filled with the many "called") together for good. When Christ has finished His work, He will offer us the Kingdom of Heaven to the Father and God will be "all in all".
Not really, your doctrine is out there for me. We are not robots, we have choice, we can fall, not all will be saved. Your doctrine is far from what the word actually says.Does any of what I've just said ring true to you? I know I didn't give scriptual support but I certainly can and have done so on many of my recent posts on this thread and a few others. So rather than repeat myself, please read my recent posts if you want to see the scriptural support of God's plan for mankind that I just layed out.
The ONLY One God chose was Christ. God is choosing His Son in us. Jesus is the One in whom He delights. We are ONLY accepted in Christ. He chose "in Christ" before the foundation of the world.
Many are called, but few are chosen. Upon our calling, we choose to abide in Him, He is the One who we must be acceptable to. We can not declare ourselves already saved, we may not be acceptable to Him, and some will fall away. We do have a responsibility of remaining in Christ.
You are right, the decision is not "automatiic" but Christ is the cause of us making the decision and we can only make that decision when He decides for us to make it. There is plenty of scripture that supports my statement.
Hey Joe,
We disagree on so many points. When someone looks through scripture with a filter on, as you are doing with your universalism beliefs, then it is very difficult for you to see anything else. You are leaving ALOT of scripture out.
And, as Johnny said, 'You are leaving ALOT of scripture out', there is much more which does not support your statement, Joe.
I note your use of the word 'drags', which suggests you're an adherent to Stephen Jones' teachings. Yes, 'drag' is the correct translation for the Greek word, but it is qualified entirely be a sentence a little further on in John 3:18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believes not is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. God does not tolerate unbelief.
Stephen Jones' proposition that after the resurrection, at judgment, there will be no choice for some people but to obey God to the saving of their lives eternally - has no scriptural support whatever. Dan 12:2 and John 5:29 agree with John 3:18. The obedience those who did 'not believe' will be doing, will comply with Matt 7:23, Matt 24:51, Matt 25:30, 41, 46, Luke 13:27, 28.
Dragonfly, I thought some of Joe's teachings sounded familiar. Thanks for pointing Jones' out.
Axe
Dear Axehead, Dragonfly and JohnnyB,
I do NOT agree with most of Stephen Jones' teachings. He is just another harlot teacher seeking a following and financial support (but at least he doesn't teach your hell doctrine). As a last defense, you are simply trying to classify me into some harlot group/teacher because you have no scriptural response to my beliefs. Why do you ignore the scriptures that I post? Is it because they confirm what I teach and you have no response? Why won't you believe the scriptures? The ones that I have posted are "milk" and are easy to understand. Even my 11 year old son can understand them.
You are right though not to believe me merely because I say I am right BUT you should believe the scriptures. Again, WHY WON'T YOU BELIEVE THEM??? You really need to search within yourself for that answer. But if you can't find the answer within yourself, you might try scripture because it does explain why you won't believe. Of course, since you don't believe the scriptures that I post concerning God's plan, then you will probably not believe the scriptures that explain why you won't believe them.
Will someone please address the scriptures that I have posted and tell me why you don't believe they say what I believe they are saying?
Let's start with this very simple double witness of scripture:
1John 4:14 And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Saviour of the world.
1 Tim 2:4-6 Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth. For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time.
Anyone up to the task?
As you know, the title of this thread is "What is trusting God exactly?". Trusting God is believing that He can do what He says He will do, even when it seems impossible. For most people, it seems impossible for Christ to actually save all of mankind. But as for me, I trust Him enough to believe He can accomplish all that He says He will do. Where is your faith to believe Him?
Sincerely,
Joe
Being condemned means that you are going to be judged and will have to pay for your sins.
Hi Joe,
The main problem I find with the scriptures you post, to which you request a comment, is the huge weight of conflicting scripture which you do not post. Your version of doctrine is very beguiling, simply because you have made up a solution for the two biggest problems on earth - sin and death - to accommodate your distaste for the destruction of those who reject God's rule over their lives in this life. By placing the responsibility for man's sin on God, you have removed all the culpability from man which God throughout scripture repeatedly puts on him.
While you refuse to accept the premise upon which God sent His Son to die for the sin and the sins of the world, none of your doctrine ties up properly with the whole counsel of God through His word, although it's true that after the sacrifice of His Son, God desires all men to be saved. Rom 1, the second half, lays out the issues very clearly - that men who choose not to retain God in their knowledge, must repent or die.
The fact is, Adam died because he sinned, and in him the entire human race is already dead, unless individuals consciously choose to opt out of sin (and therefore save themselves from the inevitability of eternal death which accompanies sin) through faith in Christ; by whose death we may be freed from the power of sin, to walk in newness of (abundant) life now, as JohnnyB also stated.
This is the gospel which was preached by the apostles, received from Jesus Christ Himself, which you have altered very significantly.
For you to say
shows you have not understood how either the condemnation or the salvation, both spoken of in scripture, truly work.
If any of us had to pay for our own sins, that would be the end of us.
But there is one way to eternal life, and that is to repent from sin now, and receive Jesus Christ as Saviour and Lord. Then Father will send the Holy Spirit to empower the new believer to walk in newness of life, with power over sin. 1 John 2:1, 1 John 3:3, 1 Peter 4:1, 2, Gal 5:24.
Your doctrine that not only did God intend for Adam (created in His own image) to sin, but by implication calls sin 'good', is an abomination.
God's acquaintance with evil Gen 3:5, 22 does not mean there is sin in God. God is utterly holy and pure.
Please understand this God purifies us by the fire in this life, and after death, judgment will finalise our eternal end. Heb 9:27.
As to your request for a duel of scriptures, I don't have time for that unless you are genuinely open to seeing truth which is writ plain and large throughout His word. Claiming you already know God's plan, while at the same time ignoring the most significant parts of His revelation of His heart throughout the book, means you have a lot of travelling to do to come into full agreement with God.
You have mentioned carnal thinking several times, and there is indeed carnal thinking. One of the hallmarks of it, is its desire for self-preservation in the face of the awful truth about the inevitability of death. The carnal mind will figure out endless solutions which preserve itself, its dignity, its academic integrity, its faith in itself, its desire to have some innate goodness acknowledged which means it doesn't have to die one day, (I could go on) - but the fact of salvation is, the whole person has to accept Christ's death, or, its own. There are no other options.
Once you 'get' that, you'll be flying. Reckoning yourself dead, you will begin to live in God, with power over sin. Rom 6:7 - 12. By this means, if you are faithful to abide in Christ, you escape the wrath of God, and eternal damnation. This is the only way to eternal life.
I would like to start with your 1 Tim verse.
The better translation is here:
3 This is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Savior,4 who desires all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth.
This directly coincides with scripture as is shown here.
Ezek 18:23-24
23 “Do I have any pleasure in the death of the wicked,” declares the Lord God, “rather than that he should turn from his ways and live? 24 “But when a righteous man turns away from his righteousness, commits iniquity and does according to all the abominations that a wicked man does, will he live? All his righteous deeds which he has done will not be remembered for his treachery which he has committed and his sin which he has committed; for them he will die.
Ezek 18:3232 “For I have no pleasure in the death of anyone who dies,” declares the Lord God. “Therefore, repent and live.”
Clearly in scripture the Lord God declares there are some who die.
![]()
Universalism or Ultimate Reconciliation
Universalism is a growing doctrine based on the false belief that universally all are already saved or will be saved in the end. Some even say “everyone is already saved they just don’t know it.
Universalism is a false teaching that says that God, through the atonement of Jesus, will ultimately bring reconciliation between God and all people throughout history. This reconciliation will occur regardless of whether they have trusted in or rejected Jesus as savior during their lifetime. This universal redemption will be realized in the future where God will bring all people to repentance. This repentance can happen while a person lives or after he has died and lives again in the millennium or some future state.
Additionally, a few universalists even maintain that Satan and all demons will likewise be reconciled to God.” See: www.carm.org/uni/universalism
It is true that “God was in Christ Jesus reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them.” However an objective universal truth is meaningless and useless to us, unless we subjectively apprehend to it by faith.
When we reach out by faith and personally receive that God has reconciled us to Himself by the death, burial and resurrection of His son Jesus, and we receive Jesus Christ, then we are born-again. But it is totally illegitimate to say we already are saved, we just don’t know it. That sounds like a new age phrase, “sin is only ignorance.” Even if I know the truth that Jesus did it all, salvation is not mine until I receive Him as my Lord and Savior and make Him my ALL. So, being enlightened doesn’t save us--what saves us is our choice to personally believe it, and receive Him who cleanses us of our sins; delivers me from the fallen satanic nature and fills me with His Spirit. It is only then that I am saved. Sad to say, many will refuse to obey the Gospel and will be lost. II Thessalonians 1:8-10 testifies to that fact.
1Th 1:8 For from you sounded out the word of the Lord not only in Macedonia and Achaia, but also in every place your faith to God-ward is spread abroad; so that we need not to speak any thing.
1Th 1:9 For they themselves shew of us what manner of entering in we had unto you, and how ye turned to God from idols to serve the living and true God;
1Th 1:10 And to wait for his Son from heaven, whom he raised from the dead, even Jesus, which delivered us from the wrath to come.
Universalism is the beginning of the great deception which will eventually lead God's people into the apostasy prophesized in II Thessalonians. 2: 3. “Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition, who opposes and exalts himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sits in the temple of God showing himself that he is God.” You can’t fall away from something that you didn’t already have. This verse is talking to Christians.
I believe Universalism is greatly linked to the current "sin explosion" in the Church. And the "sin explosion" was prophesied.
Matt 24:12 And because iniquity shall abound, the love of many shall wax cold.
Universalism and false oneness go hand in hand. False oneness says that we become God—(it is true that we are indwelt by and are an expression of God through Christ, but we never become deity.) That is what Satan thought he was choosing to be in his fall. This false union is what Paul warns against in these previously mentioned versed in II Thessalonians. Satan sitting in the temple of God (our bodies) saying that he is God. Then whatever I do or say is God without ever questioning the possibility of sin. Scary isn’t it? If this is all true, then sin is irradiated, and there must not be any hell. Eventually, Jesus loses his preeminence as “The way, The truth, and The life.” There ends up being many ways, many truths, and many roads to eternal life, which sadly forgets what Jesus said to his disciples, “no man comes to the Father, but by me.”
I have heard people say that, “everyone already has Jesus…The Jehovah Witnesses have Him, they just call him Jehovah. The Jews have him they just call him Yahweh, but it is really Jesus. The Muslim’s have Jesus, they just call him Allah.” If there is no hell, Jesus is a liar, the Gospel is a farce, we need not have personal faith for salvation. Universalism is dangerous. In my opinion it is a doctrine of demons. It tears down the foundations of our faith; it makes taking up our daily Cross irrelevant; and it leaves us in a dangerous passive state which counterfeits God’s promised “rest,” and leaves us totally indifferent to the true response and activity of faith.
If I believe this garbage, then why believe God for my personal salvation, my family member’s salvation, or for my unsaved friends? It makes personal responding faith invalid altogether. Yet in contrast to this outrageous heresy, there is a comforting verse in I Corinthians 11: 19, “For there must be also heresies among you, that they which are approved may be made manifest among you. Opposites show up each other, and make clear the truth from the lie. Have you ever heard people who believe in reincarnation talk about others that they don't like? I have heard them say, "Oh well, if he doesn’t get it right in this life, he will get it right the next time around.” I see in these people a faithless passivity which relies on the Devil’s lies. How sad. I often see this same kind of faithless passivity in the universalist who trusts in the devil’s doctrine of ultimate reconciliation instead of putting trust in the person of Christ who keeps the person to the end and saves him from a deserved hell. False oneness closes up all possibilities of any distinguishable opposites….Satan is not considered as a viable enemy….Sin is non-existent…There is no difference between the Creator and the creation; there is only oneness, eliminating unity (the two become one.)….There is no personal choice or faith response on man’s part (that appears to be separation)….Some even go so far as to say that there is no Trinity (there isn’t three in one, that is separation)….Others say it is wrong to distinguish between the sin and the sinner….There is no dividing soul/flesh from Spirit….There is no learning who you are not, and replacing that lie with who you really are…. And eventually there are no opposites, just a faithless gray oneness without distinctions.
True oneness is our union with our precious Lord and Savior; Jesus Christ and what He gained for us through His Cross. Jesus prayed for us to know this oneness like He knew it with His father. True oneness was not cheap for Him to know, and neither is it cheap for us either. Jesus, personally learned the obedience of faith by a painful process according to the bible, it says that He learned “by the things that He suffered,” (Heb. 5:8). Salvation is not salvation unless you loose your own self-life (Matt. 16:25) and by faith inherit the eternal life of Christ.
Axehead
P.S. Additional red flags and helpful links.
Some Universalists deny the Trinity and the Deity of Christ.
It is not possible to categorize all of universalists into one tidy doctrinal category. Its adherents vary in belief. Some are Arian (God is one person, Jesus is a creation). Some are Trinitarian. Others even lean toward new age concepts of man's divinity. So, universalism is not really a doctrine that identifies a group. Rather, it is a doctrine of different, even contradictory groups, who all claim universalism.
http://carm.org/christian-universalism
http://carm.org/universalism
That was an OUTSTANDING post, dragonfly. And you did it perfectly without needing any scriptures. You brought out vital truths about the character of God and heart of man. Universalism is actually a very selfish and carnal belief.
Axehead
What is Trusting God, exactly?
God desires and will have a people that willingly (not coercively) turn away from all that is not of Him, endure the cross, and turn to Him with their whole heart.
Our theology must start with Who God is, His character, and the recognition of how His very Being is expressed in His actions. Have you noticed how His being was expressed through His actions in the Old Testament? How about how His character was expressed in the death of His Son? Was that a waste or was the death of Jesus Christ significant to Universalists? How was the death of Jesus Christ significant to Universalists? Can you answer that question?
Universalism is fallacious because it presents its argument by ONLY focusing on God’s love and grace to man. What is deceiving about this is that Universalists have predetermined God's objective to SAVE ALL MEN. They then use this predetermined objective to justify God's character of love ignoring other aspects of His character. You have reduced God down to only one of His traits or attributes of character. You have to understand Divine love in a relational context to understand how God deals with men whom He has given freedom of choice to. You do believe in God’s relational love, don’t you? Do you believe man has been given freedom of choice regarding who they want to follow and what/who they want to love? Relational love cannot be forced or coerced and God will not force or coerce men to bow down to Him, and worship and love Him. God intends for man to FREELY CHOOSE to do that.
But your theology seems to have removed our freedom of choice given to us by God. God does desire for all men to be saved and is not willing for any man to perish but God is still Love whether all men are saved or some men are saved. Man cannot define the parameters of God's love as you are doing. God's love is not validated or proved by man's need of salvation or whether all men are saved. God's love needs no validation by men. His love is not subject to our “quality control” logic.
God will judge and determine all things in accord with Who He is not what man thinks one part of Him is. God's Love and Justice do not conflict with each other. Again, your theology must start with Who God is, His character and how He expresses Himself through His actions.
Throughout the Scriptures we see God's intolerance and rejection of ALL evil and sin, for they are not consistent with Himself. When God judges and rejects men that does not prove any failure whatsoever on God's part. He grieves over those who reject Him, "not willing that any should perish".
Grief and suffering don't indicate a failure of love, but instead it demonstrates a love that is reacting to a man's free choice of rejection.
Universalism has done a great job of deifying human reason and creating a god based on their own personal deductions and logical reasoning.
Universalism also seeks to deny the doctrine of sin, and they don't think God made man with freedom of choice. God did make man with freedom of choice and He allowed Himself to be vulnerable knowing that man could reject Him. That is also a character trait of God. That He can allow Himself to be vulnerable without determining a predefined outcome that will make Him "happy". Universalism proposes a predetermined outcome and in doing so does great damage to many well known and accepted doctrines of the Bible. The doctrine of sin becomes a victim. The doctrine of holiness is also a victim in that God now has evil in Him. Sin is minimized and called an "illusion".
God is love does not impose death on man, or sentence man to death, as a consequence of sin. God’s love allows man to suffer the consequence of his choices. Man derives death from “the one having the power of death, that is the devil” (Heb. 2:14) or man derives life from Jesus Christ. It is his choice. If God wanted automatons, then Jesus Christ died needlessly.
If all men are to be saved by God’s love then the question must be asked: “What was the purpose of the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ?” Almost, like Gal 2:21, you could say, "If all are destined to be saved, then Christ died needlessly.” Are we not robbing the death of Christ of its atoning and redemptive significance? What is all this business about restoring man to God in relationship and causing man to walk in His statutes? Universalists make the life and work of Jesus Christ irrelevant and meaningless.
Axehead
God desires and will have a people that willingly (not coercively) turn away from all that is not of Him, endure the cross, and turn to Him with their whole heart.
Our theology must start with Who God is, His character, and the recognition of how His very Being is expressed in His actions. Have you noticed how His being was expressed through His actions in the Old Testament? How about how His character was expressed in the death of His Son? Was that a waste or was the death of Jesus Christ significant to Universalists? How was the death of Jesus Christ significant to Universalists? Can you answer that question?
Universalism is fallacious because it presents its argument by ONLY focusing on God’s love and grace to man. What is deceiving about this is that Universalists have predetermined God's objective to SAVE ALL MEN. They then use this predetermined objective to justify God's character of love ignoring other aspects of His character. You have reduced God down to only one of His traits or attributes of character. You have to understand Divine love in a relational context to understand how God deals with men whom He has given freedom of choice to. You do believe in God’s relational love, don’t you? Do you believe man has been given freedom of choice regarding who they want to follow and what/who they want to love? Relational love cannot be forced or coerced and God will not force or coerce men to bow down to Him, and worship and love Him. God intends for man to FREELY CHOOSE to do that.
But your theology seems to have removed our freedom of choice given to us by God. God does desire for all men to be saved and is not willing for any man to perish but God is still Love whether all men are saved or some men are saved. Man cannot define the parameters of God's love as you are doing. God's love is not validated or proved by man's need of salvation or whether all men are saved. God's love needs no validation by men. His love is not subject to our “quality control” logic.
God will judge and determine all things in accord with Who He is not what man thinks one part of Him is. God's Love and Justice do not conflict with each other. Again, your theology must start with Who God is, His character and how He expresses Himself through His actions.
Throughout the Scriptures we see God's intolerance and rejection of ALL evil and sin, for they are not consistent with Himself. When God judges and rejects men that does not prove any failure whatsoever on God's part. He grieves over those who reject Him, "not willing that any should perish".
Grief and suffering don't indicate a failure of love, but instead it demonstrates a love that is reacting to a man's free choice of rejection.
Universalism has done a great job of deifying human reason and creating a god based on their own personal deductions and logical reasoning.
Universalism also seeks to deny the doctrine of sin, and they don't think God made man with freedom of choice. God did make man with freedom of choice and He allowed Himself to be vulnerable knowing that man could reject Him. That is also a character trait of God. That He can allow Himself to be vulnerable without determining a predefined outcome that will make Him "happy". Universalism proposes a predetermined outcome and in doing so does great damage to many well known and accepted doctrines of the Bible. The doctrine of sin becomes a victim. The doctrine of holiness is also a victim in that God now has evil in Him. Sin is minimized and called an "illusion".
God is love does not impose death on man, or sentence man to death, as a consequence of sin. God’s love allows man to suffer the consequence of his choices. Man derives death from “the one having the power of death, that is the devil” (Heb. 2:14) or man derives life from Jesus Christ. It is his choice. If God wanted automatons, then Jesus Christ died needlessly.
If all men are to be saved by God’s love then the question must be asked: “What was the purpose of the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ?” Almost, like Gal 2:21, you could say, "If all are destined to be saved, then Christ died needlessly.” Are we not robbing the death of Christ of its atoning and redemptive significance? What is all this business about restoring man to God in relationship and causing man to walk in His statutes? Universalists make the life and work of Jesus Christ irrelevant and meaningless.
Axehead