Yup PinSeeker......Jesus told Nicodemus that one must be born of water and Spirit to enter the kingdom of God.
Okay, well, we understand that differently, obviously.
In John 3 Jesus is baptized, in water, and the Spirit descends upon him.
Jesus always was, is, and forever will be one with the Father and the Spirit. As I said, He was never in need of salvation. For Him, being born again of the Spirit was not needed. He is the One Who baptizes with the Holy Spirit, as Mark, Luke, and John quote John the Baptist as saying. John ~ both Johns :) ~ are saying that water baptism itself is not effectual in making one eligible or conferring salvation upon the one receiving it. As Jesus says,
"With man, this is impossible. But with God all things are possible."
He then tells Nicodemus one must be born again with water and Spirit.
I'm... sure you will have an answer... :) but why was baptism not a practice in the Old Testament, Mary? That's really a rhetorical question, as we can see in Hebrews 11 that all in Christ have been, are, and will be saved the same way... You might answer "circumcision," to which I would say, yes, that was the sign and seal of the Covenant in the Old Testament (Genesis 17:11,13), as baptism is in the New, having replaced circumcision (Colossians 2:11-12). But circumcision pointed to Christ, Who was cut off for our sake, and now
we are the circumcision (Philippians 3:3), cut off by God from unbelievers/evildoers and unto Himself. God always was and is the true Circumciser..., and the Baptizer as well. This is not to say that water baptism is unimportant, but it is not salvific.
I give Scripture and Christian history to back up what I say. What did you give? Your opinion....
LOL!! My last two posts have been chock full of direct Scripture... Now, you might say that I have given my opinions regarding those Scriptures, and that's fine; I would say exactly the same of you.
To spread the Truth so that all, including you, will be saved.
So we are saved because we evangelize? Hmmm...
My point was that all the reformers thought the Holy Spirit was giving them the Truth... Allegedly RWB thinks that also.
Well, the Holy Spirit is the one Who superintended the writing of all Scripture... and reminds us of all Jesus said... and the one Who gives true discernment concerning the Word. So, yes, me, too. :)
The weird thing is all the reformers disagreed with each others 'truth'.
And I have said this is untrue. If you could provide examples, then maybe there would be something to talk about. :)
Sooooo was the Holy Spirit confused by giving a different truth to all those men? Or were those men confused? Such a mystery....we will never know! ;)
LOL! See directly above.
Hey PinSeeker,
You are right. It is my opinion that the Reformers attempt to "bring back correct understanding and belief in God's holy, incorruptible, infallible, true Word' was a complete and utter failure.
Thanks for admitting that. I disagree, and, no offense intended, would say that you cannot possibly make such an statement or assessment with any credibility.
It was a failure because they all disagreed with each other and tricked the flock into thinking they were being guided by the Holy Spirit...
See above. Regarding the first half of this statement, with no examples, no conversation can be had, and regarding the latter half, well, "tricked the flock" is just silly. :) And again, you can give me your opinion about who is guided by the Holy Spirit and who is not (over and over and over again), but it is yet still just an opinion.
It is weird that the Reformers thought the men of The Church got some salvific doctrine wrong but also got some right so they kept the 'right' teachings of The Church and got rid of the 'wrong' teachings. Without saying it they were saying that The Church was guided by the Holy Spirit into SOME truths....but the Holy Spirit gave ME (Calvin, Luther, Zwingli etc) the truth. Just weird....
<eyeroll>
I find your opinion that the Holy Spirit is engaged in an ongoing work from the Reformers time until now.
All I'm saying is that the Holy Spirit is still at work, even as He was before and during the 16th century.
The Reformers didn't teach that abortion, gay sex and gay marriage were acceptable. There are denominations that now teach all those things. Is that part of the ongoing work of the Holy Spirit that you are talking about?
<eyeroll>
Oh goodness.....I don't know what to say. I digress......
LOL! Mary, a denomination is a recognized autonomous branch of the Christian Church. I know full well you will disagree vehemently, but the Catholic denomination is... well, a denomination. :)
Nope, not naive and please don't start being condescending....
I said your assertion was naive, not you, Mary. Things are what they are.
I know that "Division has always been with us, and always will be,..."
Good, so you understand why denominations exist... including the Catholic denomination... and the non-denominational denomination. :)
In an effort to make my statement less "naive" I will re-word it:
Previous statement: Before the Reformation (revolution) most of Christianity was united under One Church with One doctrine and One truth which was, for the first 1,500 years of Christianity, a fulfilment of Jesus prayer (John 17:20-23). After the Reformation we were divided.
New statement: Before the Reformation (revolution) most of Christianity was united under One Church with One doctrine and One truth which was a fulfilment of Jesus prayer (John 17:20-23). After the Reformation we were MORE GREATLY divided.
A bit better crafted, but... :) There is one Church, Mary. Always has been and always will be. Christ's Church consists of God's elect.
Grace and peace to you.