TinMan
Well-Known Member
The church visitor didn't say one way or the other.Church Greeter: Welcome to church!
Church Visitor: Approve of my sexual deviancy as normal or I'll call you names.
Indeed. What's wrong with this picture?
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
The church visitor didn't say one way or the other.Church Greeter: Welcome to church!
Church Visitor: Approve of my sexual deviancy as normal or I'll call you names.
Indeed. What's wrong with this picture?
It was a concept invented by the Frankfurt School in Germany to justify all kinds of wickedness. Transgenderism is based on Marxist philosophy, which seeks to break down society to swoop in and rebuild it in its image. Are you a Marxist TinMan?False claim
If I point out your sin, you feel guilty. You misinterpret it as an attack.You attack LGBT people all the time and you attack anyone who doesn't share you prejudice.
You seem to hear what you want to hear. I maintain that homosexual behavior is degrading. I limit my comments to behavior. You read into my comments things I didn't say.If you posted what you say here about any other group it would be degrading at best.
Be adult enough to face reality.Be adult enough to own your opinion
The concept of transgenderism is not real. Try to understand that "truth" is not a consensus opinion as post-moderns believe. Just because you hear about transgenderism in the news doesn't make it real. The idea that gender transcends sexuality is absurd. And anyone who has been paying attention to the transformation of American culture will surely attest to the insanity of such absurd claims.You lied what you said there is no such thing as transgender.
I have no doubt that you believe what you say you believe. But like all "religious" beliefs, you hold them without a rational basis. You hold them in order to maintain respectability among your friends and colleagues. You have adopted science as your religion and uncritically believe whatever they tell you.No I am honest. That may be confusing to you.
So you looked it up in an encyclopedia. Good for you young man.Philosophy of science is a branch of philosophy concerned with the foundations, methods, and implications of science. The central questions of this study concern what qualifies as science, the reliability of scientific theories, and the ultimate purpose of science as well as the use of science to enlighten and educate.
You should take your own advice as you pretty much reject all of this.
None of what you write is true.the point is that the Old Testament has much to say about rape and blood sacrifice and slavery and polygamy but you don't want those passages brought up in dealing with such issues today. But you do want to use the Old Testament to justify bigotry against one minority of people...a group of people you choose to hate.
I already explained - multiple times. You know that homosexuality is a sin according to the Bible, right?Still waiting for you to tell us all why 8 year old Gabriel was evil.
I understand your point. The treatment of an 8-year-old should not be used to determine the answer to a question. As people of faith, we base our judgment of right and wrong on the inherent nature of actions and their alignment with Biblical principles. The evaluation of how an 8-year-old is treated should be based on the same criteria as sexual behavior. However, it is important to note that the treatment of an 8-year-old is a distinct issue from that of sexual behavior.I already explained - multiple times. You know that homosexuality is a sin according to the Bible, right?
I described this as no one here would deny that sin is done to sinners.The evaluation of how an 8-year-old is treated should be based on the same criteria as sexual behavior. However, it is important to note that the treatment of an 8-year-old is a distinct issue from that of sexual behavior.
Transgenderism has been documented in cultures across the world going back thousands of years. The term transgender was coined in 1965 by psychiatrist John F. Oliven of Columbia University.It was a concept invented by the Frankfurt School in Germany to justify all kinds of wickedness. Transgenderism is based on Marxist philosophy, which seeks to break down society to swoop in and rebuild it in its image. Are you a Marxist TinMan?
Oy vey! Letting sexual deviants adopt kids; nothing but good will flow from that decision.She also addresses … society’s
ingrained assumptions about gender roles.
What sin do you think you are pointing out?If I point out your sin, you feel guilty. You misinterpret it as an attack.
It's not my definition. it is the sociological, psychological and legal definition of orientation.You seem to hear what you want to hear. I maintain that homosexual behavior is degrading. I limit my comments to behavior. You read into my comments things I didn't say.
I don't accept your bogus classification of "orientation", which is absurd. The concept of orientation was invented by evil people in order to justify their wickedness.
That is your fantasy and not realityBe adult enough to face reality.
The concept of transgenderism is not real.
Like all who embrace hate and prejudice your beliefs actively reject rationality all togetherTry to understand that "truth" is not a consensus opinion as post-moderns believe. Just because you hear about transgenderism in the news doesn't make it real. The idea that gender transcends sexuality is absurd. And anyone who has been paying attention to the transformation of American culture will surely attest to the insanity of such absurd claims.
I have no doubt that you believe what you say you believe. But like all "religious" beliefs, you hold them without a rational basis. You hold them in order to maintain respectability among your friends and colleagues. You have adopted science as your religion and uncritically believe whatever they tell you.
That's more than you did.So you looked it up in an encyclopedia. Good for you young man.
I say that about every one of your posts.None of what you write is true.
no, you dodged, denied and even lied and tried to claim I was the one who said he was evil.I already explained - multiple times.
Wrangler's original claim was that LGBT people deserve the treatment they receive because they are evil. Post #958I understand your point. The treatment of an 8-year-old should not be used to determine the answer to a question. As people of faith, we base our judgment of right and wrong on the inherent nature of actions and their alignment with Biblical principles. The evaluation of how an 8-year-old is treated should be based on the same criteria as sexual behavior. However, it is important to note that the treatment of an 8-year-old is a distinct issue from that of sexual behavior.
was this before or after I said the boy was evil?I described this as no one here would deny that sin is done to sinners.
Our friend, @TinMan, wants to assert that because the 8-yo did not deserve the treatment he received, it makes homosexuality NOT a sin. Conflating, indeed!