Be honest you were being very condescending
and still no answers to my questions.
Answering your questions never helps. You just fire back more emotional reasoning. All you want is an admission that you or someone or some group with whom you are in sympathy has been victimized and that you are justified in what the late Dr. Albert Ellis calls A-to-C thinking. Things are the way they are, regardless of what you or I think or feel. Take a good emotional intelligence (because I am definitely questioning that) test and see if you couldn't use some REBT or CBT (most of us could, so there's no shame in that). If you find all of this condescending, then you probably do. I dare you to reply with some objective expression.
"So presenting claims made from made up research is not a lie?"
If someone presents claims with supporting research that they know is fabricated, or even haven't been reasonably careful to verify its scope and meaningfulness, it could be considered false witness, yes.
"what was the 'bad stuff' exactly?"
Saturating a child's mind with affirmations of "families" that are headed up by people living in violation of the 7th commandment is
bad stuff. Occasional things like "F is for family" and "Love is baking a cake" so insubstantially redeem the overall effect of such material as to be negligible.
I didn't answer your questions before because the predictable nitpicking and goalpost-moving replies are annoying and unproductive to encourage by their acknowledgment.
Also, I can only allow myself to devote so much time to politically-charged discussions.