Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
so, might be better to say that it was appropriated for Him :)thank you
I think the title (Christ) belongs to him. Is that what we are talking about?so, might be better to say that it was appropriated for Him :)
Regarding Jehovah's loyal servants who preceded the Christians, the inspired letter to the Hebrews, written about 61 AD, says:
Heb. 11:13 In faith all of these died, although they did not receive the fulfillment of the promises; but they saw them from a distance and welcomed them and publicly declared that they were strangers and temporary residents in the land. 14 For those who speak in such a way make it evident that they are earnestly seeking a place of their own. 15 And yet, if they had kept remembering the place from which they had departed, they would have had opportunity to return. 16 But now they are reaching out for a better place, that is, one belonging to heaven. Therefore, God is not ashamed of them, to be called on as their God, for he has prepared a city for them
(...) 39 And yet all of these, although they received a favorable witness because of their faith, did not obtain the fulfillment of the promise.
If in the first century those God's loyal worshipers (like Abel, Enoch, Noah, the patriarchs, Moses, the judges of Israel, Samuel, the prophets like Isaiah, Ezekiel, Daniel, etc, the just kings like David, Josiah, etc, etc , etc.) had not received the fulfillment of the promises
... when and where will they receive it?
well, i guess most ppl think that? But it was an Olde, pretty well-worn title by then; likely chosen a bit tongue-in-cheek, for a comparison i think? Since all the other saviors, weren't? maybe? something like that anywayI think the title (Christ) belongs to him. Is that what we are talking about?
Why are you flooding my thread with nonsensical posts, not even quoting a biblical text related with the topic, and derailing the whole thread?well, i guess most ppl think that? But it was an Olde, pretty well-worn title by then; likely chosen a bit tongue-in-cheek, for a comparison i think? Since all the other saviors, weren't? maybe? something like that anyway
anyway Pharaohs, Chinese Emperors, Caesars, popes even, all used the title
This is what the Scriptures teach:
1) Daniel has not yet received the fulfillment of what was promised to him
"But as for you, go on to the end. You will rest, but you will stand up for your lot at the end of the days" (Dan. 12:13).
2) David did not ascend to heaven at any time:
Acts 2:25 For David says about him: ‘I keep Jehovah constantly in front of me, for he is at my right hand that I may never be shaken. 26 On this account my heart became cheerful and my tongue rejoiced greatly. And I will reside in hope; 27 because you will not leave me in the Grave, nor will you allow your loyal one to see corruption. 28 You have made life’s ways known to me; you will fill me with great joy in your presence.’[Psal. 16:8-11]
29 “Men, brothers, it is permissible to speak with freeness of speech to you about the family head David, that he died and was buried, and his tomb is with us to this day. 30 Because he was a prophet and knew that God had sworn to him with an oath that he would seat one of his offspring on his throne, 31 he foresaw and spoke about the resurrection of the Christ, that neither was he forsaken in the Grave nor did his flesh see corruption. 32 God resurrected this Jesus, and of this we are all witnesses. 33 Therefore, because he was exalted to the right hand of God and received the promised holy spirit from the Father, he has poured out what you see and hear. 34 For David did not ascend to the heavens, but he himself says, ‘Jehovah said to my Lord: “Sit at my right hand 35 until I place your enemies as a stool for your feet.” [Psal. 110:1]’
36 Therefore, let all the house of Israel know for a certainty that God made him both Lord and Christ, this Jesus whom you executed on a stake.”
... and those two points are enough to understand that what you are saying before is contrary to what the Scripture is saying there.
Do you really think you can freely teach things without first learning everything you need to know before jumping to personal conclusions and pretending it's God's Word by using one or two isolated Bible texts? What do you think God thinks about that practice?
I don't see any biblical demostration of this that you say you "explained". Maybe you feel you did ... Believe me, you didn't explain anything at all; you just said what you believe.(...) Also, as I've already explained the Old Covenant faithful saints did indeed receive the better promise when they ascended with Christ to heaven. (...)
I don't see any biblical demostration of this that you say you "explained". Maybe you feel you did ... Believe me, you didn't explain anything at all; you just said what you believe.
As I just explained to you with two biblical samples, no one who lived before Christ is in heaven.
Dan. 12.13; Acts 2:34![]()
No need. None of them says what you say.Still haven't addressed the verses. I'm not at all surprised. It's hard to refute truth from the Word of God!![]()
I have never that before. I know there were lots of people called "Jesus."well, i guess most ppl think that? But it was an Olde, pretty well-worn title by then; likely chosen a bit tongue-in-cheek, for a comparison i think? Since all the other saviors, weren't? maybe? something like that anyway
anyway Pharaohs, Chinese Emperors, Caesars, popes even, all used the title
Isaiah 55:11 teaches us that whatever God purposes to do it will be accomplished. God's purpose will be fulfilled nothing or no one will stop it.Great point maam. God's gift to man has always been life eternal. Heaven only opened as a necessity, and only those chosen to go will go. God created the earth for physical creatures.
yeh, i guess it was the most popular male name back then? (and Nazareth was uninhabited in that century, apparently) Jesus, of NazarethI have never that before. I know there were lots of people called "Jesus."
I believe it is Christ who resurrects, though some would argue Christ is the Son, and that the Father resurrects, I think.yeh, i guess it was the most popular male name back then? (and Nazareth was uninhabited in that century, apparently) Jesus, of Nazareth
And “Savior, Christ” was a more or less universal title claimed by pretty much every ruler, ever
but as you say Jesus did not testify of Himself that way
anyway it is Christ Who resurrects, wouldnt you say?
and i wouldnt be waiting for some future tomorrow for that :)
“buried with Him in death, raised to new life in Him”
I came that you might have life, more abundantly
“death, more abundantly”Why "Jehovah" and why not "Yahweh Elohim"? Obviously we have another JW in our midst, sowing spiritual confusion.
BTW "Resurrection on earth" is meaningless. The resurrection of the saints is followed by all them being taken up to Heaven, just like when the two prophets during the reign of the Antichrist are resurrected and taken up to Heaven.
And after three days and an half the Spirit of life from God entered into them, and they stood upon their feet; and great fear fell upon them which saw them. And they heard a great voice from heaven saying unto them, Come up hither. And they ascended up to heaven in a cloud; and their enemies beheld them. (Rev 11:11,12)
Following the Resurrection/Rapture all the saints will be taken up to Heaven. "Come up hither" is exactly where God wants them.
No need. None of them says what you say.
But you are seing this clearly:
Acts 2:34 For David did not ascend to the heavens, but he himself says, ‘Jehovah said to my Lord: “Sit at my right hand ..."
... and you still keep trying to deny what it says there.
Do you really mind what the Bible teaches?
i dont have a problem with different perspectives of Scripture fwiw, and i wish you the best of luckWhy are you flooding my thread with nonsensical posts, not even quoting a biblical text related with the topic, and derailing the whole thread?
Nothing better to do?![]()
Wow, are you "listening" to yourself?I understand Elie why you are not able to refute. You cannot refute what you do not know. You see yourself as a teacher of the Word, but I see you an indoctrinated clone, created by your clan. You've been taught to follow the teachings of the clan, but you have never been taught, or even learned for yourself how to study the Word of God and determine for yourself what is truth.
David, like the verse you quote says, has not yet physically ascended into the heavens bodily and will not until all the foes of Christ have been destroyed. David has ascended not into "the heavens" as he will when the last trump sounds, but his spirit has indeed ascended a living soul into heaven itself. Because Christ rescued his life (spirit) from the dead and took David spiritually alive with Him to heaven. Else David could not sit at the right hand of Christ, where He now is a living soul in heaven, unless David had ascended to heaven with the Lord. And he will physically ascend into the HEAVENS at the last day, when the last trump sounds.
Acts 2:34-35 (KJV) For David is not ascended into the heavens: but he saith himself, The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, Until I make thy foes thy footstool.
Your clan apparently hasn't taught you how Scripture in CONTEXT is the proper way to learn truth from the Word of God.
Wow, are you "listening" to yourself?
David did not ascend to heaven ... but David did ascend to heaven ... ????
Do you seriously not realize how much verbiage it takes to cover up the fact that you are denying the Scriptures?