Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
God will certainly be fair on Judgment Day.I have been to several countries where Christianity is not very welcome. The people may not be all that sound doctrinally, but their love for Jesus is amazing!
The WHO’s Pandemic Treaty “Is Tied To A Global Digital Passport And ID System”
by Aaron Kheriaty | Human Flourishing
View attachment 22935
The WHO recently announced plans for an international pandemic treaty tied to a digital passport and digital ID system.
Meeting in December 2021 in a special session for only the second time since the WHO’s founding in 1948, the Health Assembly of the WHO adopted a single decision titled, “The World Together.”
The WHO plans to finalize the treaty by 2024. It will aim to shift governing authority now reserved to sovereign states to the WHO during a pandemic by legally binding member states to the WHO’s revised International Health Regulations.
In January of 2022 the United States submitted proposed amendments to the 2005 International Health Regulations, which bind all 194 U.N. member states, which the WHO director general accepted and forwarded to other member states. In contrast to amendments to our own constitution, these amendments will not require a two-thirds vote of our Senate, but a simple majority of the member states.
Most of the public is wholly unaware of these changes, which will impact the national sovereignty of member states.
The WHO’s Pandemic Treaty “Is Tied To A Global Digital Passport And ID System”
The proposed amendments include, among others, the following. Among the changes the WHO will no longer need to consult with the state or attempt to obtain verification from the state where a reported event of concern (e.g., a new outbreak) is allegedly occurring before taking action on the basis of such reports (Article 9.1).
In addition to the authority to make the determination of a public health emergency of international concern under Article 12, the WHO will be granted additional powers to determine a public health emergency of regional concern, as well as a category referred to as an intermediate health alert.
The relevant state no longer needs to agree with the WHO Director General’s determination that an event constitutes a public health emergency of international concern. A new Emergency Committee will be constituted at the WHO, which the Director-General will consult in lieu of the state within whose territory the public health emergency of international concern has occurred, to declare the emergency over.
The amendments will also give “regional directors” within the WHO, rather than elected representatives of the relevant states, the legal authority to declare a Public Health Emergency of Regional Concern.
Also, when an event does not meet criteria for a public health emergency of international concern but the WHO Director-General determines it requires heightened awareness and a potential international public health response, he may determine at any time to issue an “intermediate public health alert” to states and consult the WHO’s Emergency Committee. The criteria for this category are simple fiat: “the Director-General has determined it requires heightened international awareness and a potential international public health response.”
Through these amendments, the WHO, with the support of the United States, appears to be responding to roadblocks that China erected in the early days of covid. This is a legitimate concern. But the net effect of the proposed amendments is a shift of power away from sovereign states, ours included, to unelected bureaucrats at the WHO. The thrust of every one of the changes is toward increased powers and centralized powers delegated to the WHO and away from member states.
Leslyn Lewis, a member of the Canadian parliament and lawyer with international experience, has warned that the treaty would also allow the WHO unilaterally to determine what constitutes a pandemic and declare when a pandemic is occurring. “We would end up with a one-size-fits-all approach for the entire world,” she cautioned. Under the proposed WHO plan, pandemics need not be limited to infectious diseases and could include, for example, a declared obesity crisis.
As part of this plan, the WHO has contracted German-based Deutsche Telekom subsidiary T-Systems to develop a global vaccine passport system, with plans to link every person on the planet to a QR code digital ID.
“Vaccination certificates that are tamper-proof and digitally verifiable build trust. WHO is therefore supporting member states in building national and regional trust networks and verification technology,” explained Garret Mehl, head of the WHO’s Department of Digital Health and Innovation.
“The WHO’s gateway service also serves as a bridge between regional systems. It can also be used as part of future vaccination campaigns and home-based records.”
This system will be universal, mandatory, trans-national, and operated by unelected bureaucrats in a captured NGO who already bungled the covid pandemic response.
Will you have a Jane?....It's the mark of the beast system and I will resist it till I die even if it means living like Tarzan
Will you have a Jane?....![]()
Listen to this original video especially at the 17th minute and afterwards.....there was ZERO deaths...they did say there were 2 shootings of kids....no deaths and then they said 2...they accounted for ALL the kids....
https://bnt-cdn.b-cdn.net/upload/vi...ea7055d567bda136f212_video_720p_converted.mp4
you can actually download this video to your computer...before it get taken down....it was another Sandy Hook fake killing...
@Wrangler @Cristo Rei @Bobby Jo @Taken @Enoch111
You got it and they are so straight faced with it on the news...now most do not know the entire picture when they are on the scene, the news folks, they are used like the cops. And there are the paid crisis action parents etc...just like Sandy Hook.....Ahaha and who was that weird nodding woman at 19 minutes... She was pretty... Pretty clueless... LoL
They want to bring in tighter gun laws in America and their manufacturing false flag events to bring it just like they did here in Australia.
They will try and bring in stricter background checks and limit the sale of automatic guns i think like they did here
THis shooting hoax followed the same Mo pattern..Mention of Oklahoma Bombing...
...Interesting.
...Waco Clinton sanctioned Feds murder rampage.
...Ruby Ridge Clinton sanctioned Feds murder rampage.
...Fed Govt. stirring backlash, especially FBI, highly unfavorable.
...Oklahoma bombing; Waco, Ruby Ridge news quiets, Sympathy pours out to FBI, “convenient”heat off subsides off FBI!
...Clintons dirty deeds from Governor to WH.![]()
They will continue to pound away Ozzy style, as in Port Arthur, until they get the result they want, no question about it.Everyone hysterically go and hand in your guns for the good of America before we all get killed...
Hysterical. That's what they want people to become because you can more easily manipulate hysterical people. A rational person cannot be manipulated like that so they have to make it hysterical.
And I figured out why Americans think there are no guns here at all... It's because the media in America have lied to Americans about it... It's propaganda... "Look at Australia no guns and no mass shootings". And it's believed without anyone even looking into it. Wiki spells it all out the gun laws
Yes we have guns and yes it is highly regulated. But most Americans think it a total ban or something when it's not...
Like on another thread. First they claimed there was no guns here. I showed that they were wrong so now its oh but you need a license and this and that. Ye I never said that. All I'm saying is that there are guns here.
Anyway it looks like America is just trying to put in heavier gun controls now like they did in Australia
They will continue to pound away Ozzy style, as in Port Arthur, until they get the result they want, no question about it.
You should be a dual citizen of OZ and the States by now Cristo with all the insight you have gained. Pass the citizen test like falling off a log. Speaking of logs and trees and such, you could make a decent citizen of New Mexico say around the Los Alamos area, say as a lumber jack, where a friend of ours lives if you get my meaning.....lolto ;) to
![]()
Well as for me you are branded as a patriot regardless...You know Port Arthur was a false flag right.
Yes there was a shooting and yes people died but there was more than one gunman and the man convicted wasnt even one of them.
These people died from precision shots, double tap, arms style, yet the reports says Bryant was firing from the hip killing over 30 people with his first clip of only 24 rounds, impossible.
Ironically a politician had said the only way they would get Aussies to hand in guns was if there was such a mass shooting in a quite Tassie town. Some time later that happened.
As for dual citizenship America want even allow me into the country... I'm branded. But I haven't looked into it recently I may be OK now. Europe is ok with me but not America...![]()