GISMYS_7
Well-Known Member
I don't doubt Jesus. I doubt the trinitarian idolatry of a man, the imposing trinitarian doctrine onto unitarian text.
The one true Almighty God is Father,Son and Holy Spirit = the one true Almighty God!!
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I don't doubt Jesus. I doubt the trinitarian idolatry of a man, the imposing trinitarian doctrine onto unitarian text.
Nicodemus was the one who first raised a mother's womb. Thus, Jesus is working with that thought, which is why I believe he refers to the amniotic fluid.Just as a quick note : John 3 had nothing to do with baptism. "Water and Spirit" : "...out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water (this He spake of the Spirit)..." shows that "water" and "Spirit" are just about or completely synonymous.
Right. All human beings are born of water. That is a given. But, only those born of water (from the womb) and of spirit (from God) can see the kingdom of God.he never said anything about being born of water?
But born again of water AND the spirit
Baptism is not in view in this passage. If it were, Jesus would have said so.Wrong. Jesus corrected Nicodemus's misunderstanding. Amniotic fluid does not bring a person into the Kingdom. Baptism is physical, wet water AND spirit. It is BOTH, not either/or. All the earliest Christians for centuries were unanimous on this point. Even Luther and Calvin baptized with physical, wet water. The Bible doesn't give the exact method for baptism, we rely on the teachings of the Apostles and have never changed it. "Bible alone" Christians are hopelessly divided on the matter of baptism, which doesn't look favorable for their theology.
Don't misunderstand me. My argument is not against baptism. My argument is strictly that baptism is not the subject of discussion between Jesus and Nicodemus.You are giving the RCC ammunition . Water was not at all aminotic fluid .
the lovely water of the WORD .
However , there is something that must be clearly understood .
If the early church did do water baptism . AND THEY DID . SO TOO must we .
Let us be hearers and doers of all things , of the Word .
I don't agree that councils are required to challenge heresies. Heresy hunting is an occupation unfamiliar to Jesus and the Apostles. Christ and the Apostles recommend a different course of action, which is more worthy of the gospel.Of course. Challenging heresies REQUIRE a council to determine if it is a heresy in the first place.
If you bother to study the OT verses that Jesus quoted, you won't find "Bible alone" theology. Jesus taught what they meant, He didn't let the verses speak for themselves. Off topic. And Jesus is referring Himself.
The Nicene Creed, which you cannot comprehend, asserts that Jesus is fully God and fully man. You are saying this contradicts Scripture. Having a sensible discussion with you is IMPOSSIBLE.
It would be redundant. He's already referring to a person entering the Kingdom--all persons are already assumed to have been "born of amniotic fluid" so why would He now introduce such a condition for them entering the Kingdom? He's talking about living waters of the Spirit.Nicodemus was the one who first raised a mother's womb. Thus, Jesus is working with that thought, which is why I believe he refers to the amniotic fluid.
Yeah i dont follow luther and others either .
BUT it is true , we are saved soley by Faith in Christ .
its just if our faith is dead , then its not true faith . I LIVED a dead faith once .
I could quote the gospel but i loved the darkness . I did not know Christ .
My faith was not true faith . PRAISE GOD for sending grace that flipped we around
and gave me true faith . Yep . Truth is it happend on this very day , may thirtieth
of two thousand and six . Fifteen years ago . LET THE LORD BE PRAISED .
TRUE FAITH is seen by its fruits , by its works indeed . Truth is james nor paul contradicted one another .
IT IS FAITH that does save . Its just if its mouth and not heart faith , if it has not works , THEN IT IS DEAD ,
just as dead as i once was . And its all by the grace of GOD .
The Father is HE who draws us to Christ . LET US PRAISE AND REJOICE
in the GLORIOUS , WONDEROUS and MAGNIFICENT LORD .
Issaih twenty two , SURE wasnt pointing to the RCC my friend .
The RCC has done a number on your mind my friend .
During Jesus’ earthly ministry, the people already had the scripture that God had provided and the traditions of men that the Priests and Pharisees had added to them. God Himself, in the person of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, spoke directly to the people as God Incarnate. During that time, he:
Where Jesus expounded upon or changed the meaning of the written word from a physical burden to a spiritual truth, His authority to do so was affirmed by signs and wonders from God the Father and the Holy Spirit.
- Explained the true meaning of the scripture and quoted it as the authoritative voice of God to settle matters not open to further debate.
- Expected the people to know what scripture said and to obey and believe it.
- Praised those that obeyed the written word of God and encouraged all to listen and obey what God had written.
- Condemned the traditions of man that had been added to the words of God by those that loved the honor and authority and wealth and power that came with their exalted positions as Priests and Scribes and Teachers of the Law.
After the ascension of Christ, the task of training up the disciples and building the 12 foundations upon which the Church stands fell to the Apostles ... appointed directly by Christ and empowered at His command by the Holy Spirit to teach the first generation and write a new Scripture for future generations. This work was authenticated by the miracles and outpouring of Spirit and Power upon them.
After the death of the Apostles, what we see is no continuation of Apostolic authority or authentication in power and spirit by those that came after. We have individuals that God clearly used and specific events that were clearly miraculous, but nothing to indicate that Holy Scripture was still open to constant addition from the breath of God. God had said what He intended to say and had preserved His message in writing for the future generations to rediscover (even as Israel constantly rediscovered the Torah and came to realize how far the nation had strayed from what God had actually commanded.)
As for men, we see nothing more or less than a rebirth of the old Jewish hierarchy of Priests speaking with God, Scribes and Teachers forming an elite class between the Priests and the People that Christ shed his blood for and who truly form His Body here on Earth. Then these new “Christian Priests and Pharisees” adopt honorific titles and places of authority (as Christ specifically forbid) and gained for themselves wealth and power. As all men that gain power, suddenly there are new “traditions of man” that must be obeyed by the “people” (defined as everyone in inferior status to the Christian elite).
I am not hating on tradition. Heck, I love the Christmas tradition of the three wise men and the little drummer boy even though I know that both are complete fictions (There were three gifts, not three wise men, that visited the Infant Jesus, not the baby in the manger ... and the Little Drummer Boy is a modern, feel-good fictional story). What I object to is human traditions that directly contradict the actual words of Jesus and the writings of the apostles themselves. Sola Scriptura means that there is no higher authority that the word of God. If “traditions” contradict “Scripture”, then Scripture wins every time.
What God said, not what men think!
Right. All human beings are born of water. That is a given. But, only those born of water (from the womb) and of spirit (from God) can see the kingdom of God.
Jesus is speaking to a man who, according to the teachings of his brotherhood, believe that the Jews will enter the kingdom of God by virtue of their birth. Jesus is telling Nicodemus that birthright isn't enough.It would be redundant. He's already referring to a person entering the Kingdom--all persons are already assumed to have been "born of amniotic fluid" so why would He now introduce such a condition for them entering the Kingdom? He's talking about living waters of the Spirit.
Remember, we are interested in what the Bible means by what it says. Meaning depends almost entirely on context. Baptism is NOT mentioned in the context, but being born of a mother's womb is in the context.not what it says!
born again or f water AND the spirit
both
Yes, of course. But while the Nicene Creed says something similar, it adds concepts that are not Biblical.The one true Almighty God is Father,Son and Holy Spirit = the one true Almighty God!!
Your "context" is too broad. The meaning of Jesus' phrase "born of water" should be understood within the Nicodemus narrative. John 3:1-21Context of Jn 3:5 “born again”
Most Protestants would disagree with you. The Nicene Creed is the acceptedYes, of course. But while the Nicene Creed says something similar, it adds concepts that are not Biblical.
Jesus is speaking to a man who, according to the teachings of his brotherhood, believe that the Jews will enter the kingdom of God by virtue of their birth. Jesus is telling Nicodemus that birthright isn't enough.
Jesus is speaking to a man who, according to the teachings of his brotherhood, believe that the Jews will enter the kingdom of God by virtue of their birth. Jesus is telling Nicodemus that birthright isn't enough.