Personally, I don't see anything wrong with him quoting a single verse. Since he is responding to a statement that you made, and since the verse that he quoted seems to conflict with your stated premise, I see it that it is your responsibility to defend your statement. I understand the context that he is using, I do not understand the context that you are using.. You are claiming that he is just quoting single verses without showing some understanding of the context, but that is exactly what you are doing as well, in response to my questions. You claim that he isn't addressing the points that you bring up, just giving a scripture or two, I say that you aren't addressing the questions that I brought up.
Instead of insulting Him, why don't you explain how your premise is congruent with the scripture that he presents, in other words, defend the statement that you made. The common understanding of the scripture that he quoted, is that the devil exists. Now I do not have a problem with you believing differently. I really don't. But don't come on here and make a statement like that, and then insult other posters who posts scriptures that seem to contradict your statements. If you think that the their context is wrong, then explain why you think their context is wrong. If you believe that they are taking the scripture out of context, then explain your understanding of that scripture. All you have done so far is offer up a few verses, (which is exactly what you are accusing him of doing) along with some insults, which doesn't bring glory to God at all.
Maybe you are just tired, you did mention that it is like one in the morning where you are, and if that is all it is, I am sure that when you are refreshed, it will get better. I know that when I get tired, I get crabby.. My wife would definitely give a big "AMEN" to that one.
But I do want to thank you for your passion, anybody that will stay up past one a.m. just to talk about God is someone that I am proud to call a brother.
Joshua David
Joshua & Ducky.
Clear headed, sought the Fathers forgiveness through prayer, seeking a more contrite spirit while dealing with this subject of devils, demons and satan. :)
Where is the origin of sin? James 1:13-15 Mark 7:20-23 compare Jer. 17:9
I believe Joshua you have agreed with the above but Ducky is yet to acknowledge.
If you believe the origin of sin is the devil or Satan please provide quotations with some explanation of how they are the source of temptation.
I am going to assume you understand the meaning of the word Satan as being an “adversary": If you are in agreeance with Satan meaning in the Greek and Hebrew "adversary" then we find the following references regarding Satan:
Speaking of God in 2 Sam 24:1 compare 1 Chron 21:1.
An obediant angel is referred to as a Satan Num 22:22.
Hadad the Edomite in 1 Kings 11:14 is referred to as a Satan
The Apostle Peter is referred to as a Satan in Matt 16:23.
The following references are regarding the word Devil which means (to falsely accuse) also translated slanderer.
Speaking of Judas - John 6:70
Speaking of women in 1 Timothy 3:11 compare Titus 2:3.
Speaking of Men in 2 Timothy 3:3
Devil is also referred to as the "sin in the flesh" Heb. 2:14 compare Heb 9:26 and Rom 5:21 Rom 6:23
One MUST conclude when reading the above references that the devil is synonymous with "sin" and then read Rom. 7:17-18.
So lets talk about context.
You will find with prudent study two very clear conclusions become very apparent.
1. In the Holy Writ the word Devil (which is not found in the Old Testament????) is always used in a negative tense. Meaning you will never ever see this word used for good. Devil will always mean to falsely accuse someone...and this is never good. In other words you can never get a
"good devil"
2. However you can have a good Satan, thats right Ducky if you study your Scriptures you will find a number of references to a GOOD SATAN.
Here are some reiterated below
Speaking of God in 2 Sam 24:1 cf 1 Chron 21:1.
An obedient angel is referred to as a Satan in Num 22:22
Hadad the Edomite in 1 Kings 11:14 is referred to as a Satan
The Apostle Peter is referred to as a Satan in Matt 16:23. (Chirst defines who satan is "you speak the things of man...) why because he was being an unwanted adversary to Jesus who was preapring for the cross.
The reason its possible to have a good Satan is due to the meaning of the word Satan.
For example Joshua last night was a
good adversary; you intervened and gently rebuked me from speaking ill of Ducky. You became a good Satan to me! You were adverse to my behavoiur.
Now once you are armed with the menaing and context the many uses for the word are better understood and can be dealt with scriptures in hand.
I hopeyou are still with mer?
You will find the below quotations as those Scriptures used to support a supernatural evil Devil or Satan
1. The devil is a fallen angel. (e.g., Job 1; Rev. 12).
This presents the problem of God having all power in Heaven. Also suggest eternal / immortal beings can sin. Hopefully you both have come to an understanding that
flesh is the source of sin...not a divine beings full of pure light andd glory!
2. Devil is a personal super-human being. (e.g., Matt. 4).
Joshua, there are a number of possibilities as to who is the devil here?
1. Supernatural being forcing Christ into the wilderness to encourage sin
2. External person or persons provoking him to sin
3. Jesus himself - his carnal mind wanting to use the power for illgain.
I did say I would deal with Matt 4...so here goes
If the devil were a fallen angel, why would the Holy Spirit lead the Son of God into the wilderness to be tempted of the devil?
You agree that this is the "temptation of Christ"?
And we know Jesus "was in all points tempted like as we are" yet without sin (Heb. 4:15), but who today is ever engaged in discussion by a fallen angel devil?
If Jesus was tempted in all points as we are and you say this was Devil was known to Jesus? Why have I never been shown one?
Have you spoken to a Devil recently? Actually known its a supernatural being provoking you to sin?
For a temptation to be a temptation, it must be relevant to the person being tempted, but if a fallen angel offered to Jesus all the kingdoms of the world and their glory, Jesus would know he were a fake.
God, "the most High, {not a fallen angel}, ruleth in the kingdom of men, and giveth it to whomsoever he will." (Dan. 4:32). Jesus knew his Old Testament better than all of us combined.
So if Jesus knew it was a Devil he would also know he doesn’t have the power to offer such a thing. But what had just happened? Jesus was given
all power in heaven and earth by His Father. The only relevant temptation is
"would he use it for personal gain" Bread, safety, Kingdom etc.
Again its comes back to the source of sin.
A number of issues a presented if you believe the Devil is supernatural being
Mark's Gospel states that Jesus was "there in the wilderness forty days, tempted of Satan" (Mark 1:13), but at least one of the temptations is said to have taken place in the holy city Jerusalem. If Jesus actually in holy city, then the accounts appear contradictory.
Was his temptations in the wilderness or elsewhere?
Where is the mountain in the wilderness which is high enough to view all the kingdoms of the world and their glory in a moment of time? (Matt. 4:8 & Luke 4:5).
As stated Jesus had been baptized by John and given the Holy Spirit. Matt 3:16. How was the power to be used? To make life easy by using the power for selfish purposes making stones into bread? By "converting" Israel through dazzling displays of divine power by casting himself down from the pinnacle of the temple?
Or by avoiding the agony and humiliation of his crucifixion and the death which he must suffer, by taking the kingdoms of the world? his miracles would have assured this John 6:14 John 6:15)
I will leave it there for now...a lot to digest.
Once again Ducky my apologies for last night
Alethos