- Dec 14, 2009
- 5,131
- 3,558
- 113
- 78
- Faith
- Christian
- Country
- United States
Saturday 1-6-24 7th. Day Of The Weekly Cycle, Tevet 23 5784, 17th. Winter Day
By William F. Dankenbring/Mystery Of The Bible/Chapter 22 Who Is The True Messiah?
Is Jesus the Jew, born about 2,000 years ago, really the promised Messiah of Israel?
Modern and historic Judaism has denied this claim. The great Jewish scholar Maimonides
pointed out the major reason Jews reject Christ is because (they believe) He taught the Torah
is abolished, and no such teacher could possibly be the Messiah! He also said that since Jesus
of Nazareth did not become “king,” He failed to fulfill most of the prophecies referring to the
coming Messiah.
Maimonides seemed to confuse the state of the self-professed “Christian” Church in
his day with the teachings of Christ. Since the Church rejected God’s Torah, and claimed to
represent Christ, Maimonides repudiated Christ as the Saviour. However, Christ did NOT
abolish or deny the Torah – the Law of God. God forbid! Rather, He stated very positively,
“Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to
fulfill. For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will
by no means pass from the law [Torah] till all is fulfilled” (Matt.5:17-18, NKJV).
Maimonides claimed that Jesus did not fulfill the prophecies of becoming a great
“King”. However, Pontius Pilate asked Him, “Are You the King of the Jews?” Yeshua
confirmed that statement, saying: “It is as you say” (Matt.27:11). Jesus continued, “You
say rightly that I am a king. For this cause I was born, and for this cause I have come into
this world, that I should bear witness to the truth. Everyone who is of the truth hears My
voice” (John 18:37).
But, as Yeshua went on to explain, “My kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom
were of this world, My servants would fight, so that I should not be delivered to the Jews; but
now My kingdom is not from here” (John 18:36). The Greek word used here for “world” is
cosmos and means of this present “system” of things. As He showed elsewhere, His kingdom
will come in the future – in fact, every evidence is that He will fulfill all the Messianic
prophecies relating to the establishment of God’s Kingdom very soon, in our age, TODAY!
(For example, see Matt.24:1-31; Matt.25:31-32; John 14:1-2; Acts 1:6-7).
Therefore, the charges of Maimonides do not carry any weight, when we look at the
FACTS! Jesus never taught against the Torah. He never instituted the Church which claims
to represent Him in the world – that is an apostate, fallen, Babylonish “Church”
masquerading as the Church of God! And He will come again, as “King of kings, and Lord
of lords” (Rev.19:11-16; 17:14).
Maimonides was faced with a paradox. The so-called Church, which was attempting
to “convert” the Jews, was an apostate Church which itself rejected God’s laws and the
353 Mystery of the Bible
Torah, and had even replaced the Messiah, the true Jesus Christ, with a PAGANIZED
“Jesus,” in the image of Apollo – just as the apostle Paul had prophesied would occur (II
Cor.11:1-4).
Just who was Jesus Christ – whose Hebrew name was Yeshua the Anointed One, or
“Messiah”? What did He teach? And was He – or was He not – the true Messiah, the
Saviour, Redeemer, and promised “King” of Israel?
Did He – or did He not – fulfill the promises and prophecies which relate to the
Messiah in the Old Testament Scriptures?
A Fascinating Observation
Writes Randolph Parrish in “The Fourth Jewish Sect,” concerning the Nazarenes:
“The Nazarenes were a Jewish sect of the late Second Temple period.
They were
the followers of Yeshua of Nazareth. They believed that a mocked and ridiculed rabbi,
who had been executed under the Roman governor Pontius Pilate, was actually the
promised Redeemer of Israel. They expressed great confidence in this view, because
they asserted that everything which had happened to him, including his rejection, had
been foretold and outlined long before in the Tenach, and that it was, therefore their very
belief in the Jewish scriptures, which compelled them to recognize him as the promised
Messiah.”
In fact, Parrish says, the Nazarenes found evidence that Jesus was indeed the
promised Messiah, or Christ (“Messiah” and “Christ” both mean “Anointed One”) in the very
first pages of the Old Testament! He continues:
“It was clear to them that the scriptures talked of nothing else, quite literally from the
very beginning. For example, the opening words of Genesis 1:1 are usually translated
as ‘In the beginning . . .’ But the Hebrew word ‘reshith’ (beginning) can also have the
meaning ‘firstborn son.’ And so, one could translate this passage as ‘In the firstborn son
God created the heavens and the earth.’ Jerome quoted Aristo of Pella, who, according
to Origen, was a Nazarene (Quaest.heb.Gen.1:1) as stating in the ‘Dialogue of Jason and
Papiscos’ that the verse should be translated in this way. Iraneus also translated this as
‘The son in the beginning; then God created the heavens and the earth’ (Dem.43). Ter-
tullian noted the same possible interpretation (Adv. Prax.5).
Hilary said that ‘b’reshith’
could have three possible meanings: ‘in the beginning’; ‘in the head’; or ‘in the son.’
(Tract. Psalm 2:2). The modern French author Danielou noted the comparison between
these meanings and Col.1:15-18, where Paul seems to write of the same three meanings:
‘He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For by him were all
things created . . . And he is the head of the body . . . he is the beginning and the firstborn
. . .’ This would suggest, according to Danielou, that there was perhaps an already extant
rabbinical tradition of explaining the passage in these several ways, which Paul
employed” (quoted from The Messianic Outreach 1996).
How interesting! When properly understood, the opening of the book of Genesis is
actually a prophecy and a description of the Messiah -- the Son of God!
But is this possible translation really true? What is the evidence that Yeshua was
really the Christ? Let’s examine the possibilities, and weigh the evidence without prejudging
354 Mystery of the Bible
the case, one way or the other!
Isn't it about time we open our eyes, and rub out the sleepiness and fog of ignorance,
and admit the TRUTH of the testimony of the Old Testament Scriptures about the pre-
existence of the “Son of God” -- the Messiah?
Proof from Isaiah's Testimony
Further proof of Christ's Messiahship comes from the Dead Sea scrolls, and textual
revisions of Isaiah 53 and Psalm 22 which are indicated as being necessary, based on the
Dead Sea scroll evidence.
Professor James Tabor has for some time been studying the photographs of the Great
Isaiah Scroll found in Cave 1 at Qumran near the Dead Sea, comparing it with the standard
Massoretic text. For some time he has pointed out in lectures and in undergraduate classes
that the Qumran scroll contains the word “LIGHT” following the verb in Isaiah 53:11. Thus
the text should read: “from the travail of his soul he will see LIGHT.” Says Dr. Tabor:
“The word ‘light’ drops out of the Massoretic text, leaving the verb without an object,
and thus making the standard KJV and other translations rather meaningless: ‘he will
see [what??] from the travail of his soul.’ I have speculated that the rabbis might have
dropped this word in response to Christian polemics, since the Nazarenes would be trying
to apply Isaiah 53 to Yeshua, with the references to ‘death,’ ‘grave,’ and ‘seeing light’ as
paralleling the ‘death, burial, and resurrection’ idea that Paul claims to find ‘according to
the Scriptures’ (I Cor.15:1-3).”
Prof. Tabor shows another illustration of a variant reading in Isaiah which seems to
bolster the Christian view of Jesus being the Messiah of Israel! He goes on:
“I now discover that there is an equally significant variant reading in Isa.53:8. As you know
late Jewish interpretation has applied this entire section of Isaiah 52:13-53:12 to the Nation
of Israel. In contrast, as the Lubavitch have most recently reminded us, the Talmud under-
stands the sufferings of this ‘servant’ to be none other than the Messiah, i.e., a specific
individual, not the entire Nation, and even says he might well be one who ‘comes from the
dead,’ that is, someone who has already lived and died, but is resurrected (see Sanhedrin
98b). Verse 8 has always been somewhat crucial in this discussion, since it says that this
Figure is ‘cut off from the land of the living for the transgression of MY people.’
This verse
is quite a problem for those who want to understand the Servant Figure himself as the People
of Israel, since he clearly suffers for them -- so much so that the Koren English translation
(Jerusalem English-Hebrew Bible) which many of you have, puts here ‘cut off . . . for the
transgression of THE people’ -- a blatant and misleading translation. Well, as it turns out
the Qumran Isaiah scroll provides us with an even different reading: ‘for he was cut off . . .
for the transgression of HIS people.’ The difference in Hebrew is merely between a yod
and a vav, but the Qumran text is absolutely clear: the reading is vavsamechayin not
yodsamech ayin: On the face of it, this is no major change.
However, one of the problems
with this whole section of Isaiah is determining VOICE -- that is, who is speaking to whom?
Who is the ‘our’ and ‘we’ that runs through the chapter? If the reading is MY people, in
verse 8, then the speaker might well be YHVH, but if the speaker is the ‘All WE like
sheep have gone astray’ of verse 6, which seems most natural -- then clearly the speaker
is the people, and the reading of ‘HIS people’ in verse 8 is quite natural. Also, this DSS
reading of Isaiah 53:8 is quite significant in that it calls into question Moshe Guibbory's
interpretation of Isaiah 53 as a negative character -- the Azazel ‘abominable branch’
To Continued
Last edited: