Yes, we are in Christ, not each other.bingo!
that’s the new covenant in a nutshell
his mystical body acts 9:4 eph 5:32 eph 5:24
The Catholics are not in Christ, but a "believers lodge" with a grand poobah.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Yes, we are in Christ, not each other.bingo!
that’s the new covenant in a nutshell
his mystical body acts 9:4 eph 5:32 eph 5:24
Okay, so you teach God was manifested as a sperm cell(flesh), right?Soooo - are you asking a purposely-stupid question - or did yyou NOT read my reponse in post #411?
There is not.How can there be a contradiction between Matt 28:19 and acts 2:38?
The RCC and yourself do not know what the name of the son is.Not at all.
I simply understand that it was Jesus who gave the original unstructions on HOW to Baptize in Matt. 28:19.
As I schooled you in post #413 - we Catholics mention His name TEN TIMES MORE than YOU do in our Baptismal Rite.
Boy - you are as dense about biology as you are about Scriptutre.Okay, so you teach God was manifested as a sperm cell(flesh), right?
Ummmm - that's why His name is involed some TEN TIMES in the Catholic Rite of Baptism, Einstein.The RCC and yourself do not know what the name of the son is.
They are blind to this.
It is a phenomenon at the highest level.
It can only be discerned if they are released from the enemy at God's command.
The enemy will do anything to keep the name of Jesus from the RCC during baptism.
The enemy also baptizes infants to eliminate the resistance to those that may understand that the name of the son is actually "Jesus".
Great, so you believe God became a sperm/egg embryo?Boy - you are as dense about biology as you are about Scriptutre.
A sperm cell is NOT a person - only a feertilized egg is a person.
This is like debating with box or rocks . . .
I don't know of ANY Baptism done by "sprinkling".No, your priests purposely omit the name of Jesus as they sprinkle droplets of water in their initiation of infants into the RCC.
It is not baptism, but an initiation rite as the Moose/Elks lodges are.
This is precisely why they avoid the "annoying" name of Jesus.
They cringe at Acts 2:38.
No, the RCC tells the infant to his little oblivious face, that he is baptized in the name of the Father, son and Holy Ghost, without saying "Jesus", as the name of the son.Ummmm - that's why His name is involed some TEN TIMES in the Catholic Rite of Baptism, Einstein.
You need to start reading the posts instead of embarrassiung yourself . . .
Anther admission by the Catholic that the name of Jesus is not used in the baptism ritual of their mass.I don't know of ANY Baptism done by "sprinkling".
The priest pours water three times on the head of the person being Baptized as he baptizes them in the name of the Fathe and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, per Jesus's instruction in Matt. 28:19, Einstein.
This is how the 1st century Church Baptized . . .
Chapter 7. Concerning Baptism
And concerning baptism, baptize this way: Having first said all these things, baptize into the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, in living water. But if you have not living water, baptize into other water; and if you can not in cold, in warm. But if you have not either, pour out water thrice upon the head into the name of Father and Son and Holy Spirit.
The Didache (Teachings of the Twelve Apostles) - AD 50
YOUR heresy came MUCH later . . .
The Boible never mentions God implanting a sperm in Mary.Great, so you believe God became a sperm/egg embryo?
God and Mary together, by combining God's created sperm with Mary's egg, both made "God the Son", as we see in the gospels?
Was this the microscopic beginning of his physical life source?
The word became this?
And another admission by the ignorant quasi-Christian regarding a "Beptismal Mass".Anther admission by the Catholic that the name of Jesus is not used in the baptism ritual of their mass.
Yup - just like the Rabbi or Mohel circumcises an "oblivious" 8-day-old baby boy to bring him into a sacred Covenant with God.No, the RCC tells the infant to his little oblivious face, that he is baptized in the name of the Father, son and Holy Ghost, without saying "Jesus", as the name of the son.
every being has a nature that dies with it.
The Bible says Jesus was conceived.The Boible never mentions God implanting a sperm in Mary.
It simply says that the Holy Spirit came upon her, and the power of the Most High overshadow her (Luke 1:35).
If I were YOU - I would be VERY CAREFUL how you proceed with this conversation as you continue to mock God . . ..
Per the RCC, so called "baptism" is a way to con parents into staying around as their infants receive so called "remission of sins" that they have not yet even committed.And another admission by the ignorant quasi-Christian regarding a "Beptismal Mass".
The Rite of Baptism is NOT a Eucharistic celebration - although it can be combined at times.
Do your homework, son.
This must be humiliating for you . . .
Aaah!Yup - just like the Rabbi or Mohel circumcises an "oblivious" 8-day-old baby boy to bring him into a sacred Covenant with God.
If you havew a problem with infants entering Covenants with God - take it up with HIM.
You've already got a few strikes against you, so another one won't make a difference . . .
Yes.What is natural to me is natural to only me and dies with me?
Ummm, this, coming from the same guy who ignorantly thinbks that a sperm is a human on its own . . .The Bible says Jesus was conceived.
God knows that humans know what "conception" entails.
Catholics bury their head in the sand like elementary school kids when the word arises.
It's a wonder that Catholics even know how to procreate.
And thy stupidity betrayeth thee . . .Aaah!
The RCC is OT.
Thy speech betrayeth thee.
Let's just hope your cluelessness does as well, Einstein . . .Yes.
We have a human, carnal nature as an individual nature, unique to ourselves.
When we die, our carnality dies with us.
No, it is fact that Mary provided the egg for the sperm that God created to beget the son of God/ son of man.Ummm, this, coming from the same guy who ignorantly thinbks that a sperm is a human on its own . . .
And thy stupidity betrayeth thee . . .
Any fool knows that the NT Church is the fulfillment of OT Judaism, Einstein.
Well - apparrently not "any" . . .
Let's just hope your cluelessness does as well, Einstein . . .