Eternally Grateful
Well-Known Member
Most of us did. We also followed everything outside of it.I wonder how many people actually followed the trials and the legal arguments.
If you follow the argument and how a criminal act was done, Trump was guilty.
If you did this, You know trump was innocent.
In order for a law to be broken, people have to have been harmed. No one was harmed. If trump was guilty,l the people he made a contract were guilty also. If A law was actually broken, Then you have to take down both parties. A legal contract is binding, and was help and fulfilled by both parties.The argument that the banks did not lose out because they got their money back does
not invalidate the breaking of the law. The law is simple, has the defendent broken the
law. The answer was yes, clearly and obviously.
And no greater point of a political argument can made then all the cases against trumpThe second argument is lots of businesses do something similar, but then they should also
be prosecuted. And obviously there is a political element because attorney generals are voted
into office. The whole point of the courts is they are proving a point of law.
You mean Like the current president. who thinks he is always rightIf one believes anything against an individual is obviously fake because it is against that individual.
But to do this is to stop believing in law but rather a dictator who is always right.