bbyrd009
Groper
- Nov 30, 2016
- 33,943
- 12,082
- 113
- Faith
- Christian
- Country
- United States Minor Outlying Islands
ha, doesn't really matter--but the point is it is quite civilized, let's say.Where's that???
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
ha, doesn't really matter--but the point is it is quite civilized, let's say.Where's that???
i guess it depends upon what the prize is perceived to be. Or who the better overcomer is, perhaps.But if you put me and a gang girl in a room, who will win?
Right.nonetheless, he represents a new authority, not the lack of an authority at all.
Sometimes you sound so worldy.i guess it depends upon what the prize is perceived to be. Or who the better overcomer is, perhaps.
Disputes require two people to be disputing something; one person cannot dispute alone.
If He hadn't needed this to happen, why was the ' Lamb, slain from the foundation of the earth ' ? Doesn't the Bible also speak of God reconciling everyone to Himself in and through Christ ?"God needed Jesus to come and reconcile us to Himself," i'd like to see it
ha you will, of course, when she detects love and forgiveness from you, instead of fear and defense. i doubt even most gang girls can resist puppies with wagging tails, so to speak. Of course the interaction will be different if you ask her if she is in a gang first thing, right.God will win in the end.
His plan will be victorious.
But if you put me and a gang girl in a room, who will win?
ha, you forget how charming you can be lol. As i guess most of us do, in that situation.Sometimes you sound so worldy.
Sometimes you sound so innocent.
Chances are that SHE will want to dispute...
NOT ME!!!
well, why did Adam and Eve need a skin? It is the same question, right. i guess one way to put it is that they now felt naked; or got an ego, and it was fragile, perhaps. Or became a god, separate, with a "free" will, and suddenly felt inadequate.If He hadn't needed this to happen, why was the ' Lamb, slain from the foundation of the earth ' ?
certainly, but we turn it into a religious, ritual mush (and one popular mush is "God cannot tolerate sin anywhere near His Person" when we forget that God is everywhere, and you cannot get away from God even if you wanted to, see Jonah), when "Who told you that you were naked? Here, have this skin then" describes the situation much better. It is direct, simple, IRL (in real life, sorry), and suggests implications that we mostly do not even discuss, on religious forums anyway, lest we be dismissed out of hand.Doesn't the Bible also speak of God reconciling everyone to Himself in and through Christ ?
ah, but you are maybe forgetting that He has children with needs here?God, in my experiences, wastes nothing and does nothing which is unnecessary , so if He had not needed one single man to live his life before Himself, 100% right in all things always, thus without sin and having upheld ALL of the Law ......If He had not needed to do that, He wouldn't have
but see how their society with a chief (king) being challenged by another king, describes our "civil society" so well, from the perspective of the oppressed at least. You just happen to not be one of the oppressed, so just like in Scripture, you reveal your heart in your interpretation of the story, see. And i am not oppressed either, so i have to fix my reply here as i get more Word on it, lol, because i never realized any of this about "The Lord of the Flies" until i started this convo with you. But after all, the title is a Scripture reference, right.Right.
But I wasn't speaking of AUTHORITY.
I was speaking of a CIVIL society.
It was not civil under the mean guy.
Ralph?
bbbut see how their society with a chief (king) being challenged by another king, describes our "civil society" so well, from the perspective of the oppressed at least. You just happen to not be one of the oppressed, so just like in Scripture, you reveal your heart in your interpretation of the story, see. And i am not oppressed either, so i have to fix my reply here as i get more Word on it, lol, because i never realized any of this about "The Lord of the Flies" until i started this convo with you. But after all, the title is a Scripture reference, right.
ps, this part,
"from the perspective of the oppressed at least. You just happen to not be one of the oppressed, so just like in Scripture, you reveal your heart in your interpretation of the story, see. And i am not oppressed either,"
there is still something not right in here, so i guess we aren't done yet.
Hi bbbut see how their society with a chief (king) being challenged by another king, describes our "civil society" so well, from the perspective of the oppressed at least. You just happen to not be one of the oppressed, so just like in Scripture, you reveal your heart in your interpretation of the story, see. And i am not oppressed either, so i have to fix my reply here as i get more Word on it, lol, because i never realized any of this about "The Lord of the Flies" until i started this convo with you. But after all, the title is a Scripture reference, right.
ps, this part,
"from the perspective of the oppressed at least. You just happen to not be one of the oppressed, so just like in Scripture, you reveal your heart in your interpretation of the story, see. And i am not oppressed either,"
there is still something not right in here, so i guess we aren't done yet.
ha, yes. it can also be observed that the best way to see someone's real self is to get them drunk, lowering their inhibitions iow.The young boys become dirty savages--all their inner evils and personal turmoils surface.
The way I have been shown, was that it was necessary to make mankind in two 'bits'........He made us in His image ( spirit ) and then 'clothed' us with flesh, because He knew what man would do. So the flesh can now die ( thanks to Jesus ), but our spirits won't have to go the way of death....well, why did Adam and Eve need a skin
I couldn't agree more, and it is a very sad thing indeed, when people just turn it into some other religious observance and rituals......Imho, Adam and Eve already had skin, but had no covering once they ate off whatever it was they ingested, so they saw themselves 'openly' for the first time.......God then clothed their naked bodies with animal skin ( the first ever sacrifice ? ) Because of what Jesus did our Father is able to be among us, unlike when His presence was confined to coming once a year, onto the Mercy Seat in the Holy of Holies .....I was taught by a Pastor that the rending of the Temple curtain made it possible for us to go to our Father, however Jesus taught me that it made it possible for our Father to not be limited by our sin, so He came out ( so to speak).....certainly, but we turn it into a religious, ritual mush (and one popular mush is "God cannot tolerate sin anywhere near His Person" when we forget that God is everywhere, and you cannot get away from God even if you wanted to, see Jonah), when "Who told you that you were naked? Here, have this skin then" describes the situation much better. It is direct, simple, IRL (in real life, sorry), and suggests implications that we mostly do not even discuss, on religious forums anyway, lest we be dismissed out of hand.
i did some editing up there, hope i obfuscated enough, but prolly not lol
And He is willing and able to assist anywhere He is invited .....It comes down to the faith that works through Love.....If we can't get to know Him as ONLY Love, our faith will mostly be patchy at best...ah, but you are maybe forgetting that He has children with needs here?
If I've noticed older people tend to complain quite a lot. They must learn over the years that it is effective.
In my experience endless arguing is useless. Anything important usually comes out at the beginning of an argument. The rest is just regurgitation.