The Way/Theosis/entire sanctification.

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Hepzibah

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2012
1,377
1,034
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United Kingdom
Agree.

I simply stop short of making an absolute claim. That I'm not aware of sin committed means one of two things, either I've not committed sin, or I'm unaware of sin committed.

I don't want to get too hung up on this point.

You are including sins of omission here and evil thoughts?
I think what best describes my POV right now is that we by faith can walk in the Spirit, which is indistinguishable from Theosis except that walking in the Spirit is something we do by faith, and Theosis is something God does for us by His Own working. I'd liken Theosis to a gift of faith that allows a 24/7 walk in the Spirit, that God may give to one to enable them to lead a congregation, or to another to give encouragment that the good life is possible (like me), or for whatever reason He has. Theosis is a gift given to some, while walking in the Spirit is for all of us to do.

Theosis was understood to be for all, if they are willing and do not quench the Holy Spirit, though God of course does know who they will be. It is basically just the restoration of man to what God intended of him, not merely the state of Adam before he fell, but the next stage, where he obeys God, walks in the Spirit, and can eat of the tree of life.

It is a joint effort - man just accepting what God gives him through faith and that he himself is incapable of pleasing God in his flesh - as he has tried and failed.

God has no favourites and wishes union with all.
I've continued to ask myself, why would Theosis not continue life-long? And I think the answer must be, Because that does not serve God's purpose. And that leads to . . . how does it serve God's purpose to give a temporary Theosis? I don't see any difference between when it came, and when it went, both seemed fully determined by God and not me.

It does serve Gods purpose to train a man and that means that the man becomes more and more a spiritual warrior.
Much love!
 

Hepzibah

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2012
1,377
1,034
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United Kingdom
For me, it was learning the source and mechanism of intrusive mind race, which enabled me to take action to shut it down. It's not so much for me reforming my thoughts, rather just stopping the ones I don't want. It was a form of repetition compulsion, evil and abusive narratives running movies through my mind of evil and horrible things. This gave me a tool to "put off" this part of the old man.

Interestingly, I was telling my wife one day of the frustration and difficulty I was having in this area. A few days later she heard this book described on the radio as addressing this exact thing. She then bought it for me, and it was right on target for me.

Plainly, God knows what each of us need, and is working with us accordingly.

I don't know about that, selective amnesia? I've spent so many years missing memories, unable to understand memories I had, unable to contextualize a great deal of my life. A few years ago I regained my emotional memory, which enabled me to put these memories in sequence, and with context, and I understood so much better. It's the emotionalism that trips me up, knowing what happened to me isn't so much the problem, at least, not so much anymore. Understanding why, and that even this was an expression of God's love for me, as He was unwilling to just not have me with Him.

Mussa says that it is not he memory where the problem lies. It is quite complicated and I am still getting my head around it and looking for red flags and can you imagine the popularity of a man who can wipe trauma clean?

He claims to do it over 6 weeks and charges £6.000.

From the point of my own understanding, God allows us to suffer from the sins of others and even lets us go till old age without being aware of the damage, and also more puzzling letting our children suffer from the same results of the abuse.

I did have a crisis of faith at one time, when I was a Calvinist and was expected to believe that my suffering of so many things was God's will for me. It saved my faith to debunk this and just put all of my faith and none of my questions to Him and just trust whatever happens because of the times when I have been wrong after He showed me.
Much love!
On the sensitivity question (thanks for the links) yes I had a high score with the quiz and especially over loud noises which have always been unbearable. I always put these things down to being on the spectrum and having massive environmental toxic exposures.
 

Bruce-Leiter

Well-Known Member
Sep 23, 2024
451
276
63
82
West Michigan
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
The doctrine we have been looking at - entire sanctification, and whether it is possible for man to be without sin in this life, was taught in the early church and called Theosis or Deification, and has been found in the west during the revival years and especially during the time of the Wesley's. The early church said that it occurs in three stages, but in the west, two stages generally though sometimes three, but it is not worth getting into disputes about it until the whole concept of holiness is understood.

This however requires that a person is seeking to know the truth rather than just having idle curiosity, and is willing to allow the Holy Spirit to reveal that it is truth, directly. It cannot come through human reasoning which gets in the way. I am greatly encouraged to see on this forum, signs that He is at work and has been giving revelations, on this most unusual forum, where this subject can be discussed freely.

After many years of reading, I know that nearly all or all other forums will stop the discussion out right so thank you @Wynona for this opportunity.


"These are the states of beginners, the state of progress, and the state of the perfect.
the {removed] into the "purgative way", the "illuminative way", and the "unitive way".

These consolations are often withdrawn, and a state of desolation ensues, and then the passive purification of the senses begins.

So ultimately purification, illumination, deification—it’s not the pursuit of enlightenment; it’s the pursuit of love: the love of God. It is the pursuit of a spiritual marriage, loving and receiving love. It is the marriage-feast, love being the wine that’s set forth on God’s table. In the deified man, it’s the man who is bathed in the light of God’s love to the point that it radiates from him. St. Isaac of Syria says:

God’s love is by its nature warmth. When it lights on someone without any limit, it plunges his soul into ecstasy. That is why the heart of one who has felt it cannot bear to be deprived of it, but he gradually undergoes a strange alteration in proportion to the love that enters into him. These are the signs of that love: His face becomes inflamed with joy, and his body is filled with warmth. Fear and shame desert him as if he had gone outside of himself.


This is the description of the Paul who says, “I know a man who was caught up into the third heaven, whether in the body or out of the body, I do not know.” httphttps://www.ancientfaith.com/specials/orthodox_spirituality/our_fulfillment_in_christ

Deification in the Early Church

In the introduction to The Study of Holiness from the Early Church Fathers by J. B. Galloway(Wipf and Stock Publishers, 2014), we read: “If the teachings of the modern holiness movement are correct concerning the doctrine of holiness and the baptism with the Holy Ghost as an experience for the saints of God today, perfecting them in Christian love and freeing them form carnal sin, it seems that we should find some evidences of this faith and teachings in the period of the history of the Church where it was the closest to the days of Christ”

“The commentator Adam Clarke objected that the opinion that Paul was speaking of a regenerate person ‘has most pitifully and most shamefully lowered the Standard of Christianity, and even destroyed its influence and disgraced its character.’ A.H. Francke and J. Bengel (and, a little later, John Wesley, and, later still Moses Stuart) were among those who thought that Paul was describing a man who was under conviction of sin, but not yet regenerate. “ Rom 7:24 – Who is the ‘wretched man’? – Walking With Giants

In his celebrated book Holiness, Ryle writes: ‘I am quite satisfied that it does not describe the experience of an unconverted man, or of a young and unestablished Christian; but of an old experienced saint in close communion with God. None but such a man could say, “I delight in the law of God after the inward man” (Rom. 7:22).’

The analysis of Christian development into these three ‘ways’ or phases derives from Dionysius the Pseudo-Areopagite, who ascribed a rhythm of purification, illumination, and union (or perfection) both to the hierarchies of angels and to the Church on earth. Medieval W. interpreters of Dionysius turned his scheme into an account of spiritual progress in terms of the three ways, beginning with the eradication of bad habits and the cultivation of the virtues, moving on to the illumination of the mind by meditation and contemplation, and culminating in unitive love. These three ways were adopted by later writers such as St John of the Cross and so became classic in systematic theories of Christian spirituality. purgative, illuminative, and unitive ways

St. Gregory Nazianzen, one of the great theologians of the fourth century, calls out to us over the centuries and exhorts us with the following. To quote St. Gregory: “Let us not remain what we are, but let us become what we once were.” And from St. Peter, the chief of the apostles, through the first-century voice of St. Ignatius of Antioch, from Irenaeus of the second century through the great Cappadocian Fathers of the fourth century, of the great Desert Fathers of the fifth century, Maximus the Confessor of the sixth century to John of Damascus and John of The Ladder in the ninth century, from Gregory Palamas in the 14th century to St. Silouan in the 20th century—the great Fathers of our Orthodox Church have echoed this exhortation of St. Gregory, reminding us and ever pointing us to the truth, that by God’s grace we can become much more than we are. [removed]
I am 82 years old and have been a Christian for 66 years. For anyone who thinks he can become sinless in this life, I say look at the Scriptures in 1 Thessalonians 5:16-18, for example, where Paul calls us to have constant joy, prayer, and thanks, which are our goals that I don't believe we ever accomplish in this life, though by Jesus' resurrection power alone, we can make progress.
 

Christian Soldier

Well-Known Member
Jun 30, 2024
1,019
205
63
36
Sydney
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
I am 82 years old and have been a Christian for 66 years. For anyone who thinks he can become sinless in this life, I say look at the Scriptures in 1 Thessalonians 5:16-18, for example, where Paul calls us to have constant joy, prayer, and thanks, which are our goals that I don't believe we ever accomplish in this life, though by Jesus' resurrection power alone, we can make progress.
It's beggars belief that some professing Christians embrace this heretical teaching that one can attain sinless perfection whilst in this body of death.

Paul destroyed that heresy in;

Romans 7:18 For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh) nothing good dwells; for to will is present with me, but how to perform what is good I do not find. 19 For the good that I will to do, I do not do; but the evil I will not to do, that I practice. 20 Now if I do what I will not to do, it is no longer I who do it, but sin that dwells in me.

Paul was indwelt by the Holy Spirit when he confirmed that sin also dwells in him and that it overcomes him, so he obeys it. So Paul was unable to conquer his sin nature, even with the help of the Holy Spirit, but we have these heretics making Paul out to be a liar.
 

Hepzibah

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2012
1,377
1,034
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United Kingdom
I am 82 years old and have been a Christian for 66 years. For anyone who thinks he can become sinless in this life, I say look at the Scriptures in 1 Thessalonians 5:16-18, for example, where Paul calls us to have constant joy, prayer, and thanks, which are our goals that I don't believe we ever accomplish in this life, though by Jesus' resurrection power alone, we can make progress.
Hi Bruce, I'm a bit behind you - 50 years since I had an encounter with the living Christ at the age of 23, though 33 years since God showed me the truth of the doctrine by transferring me into it, not by my efforts at all. It is Christ manifesting His life in a human and that person having the righteousness of Him imparted.

Paul's prayer for the Thessalonians was:

23And the very God of peace sanctify you wholly; and I pray God your whole spirit and soul and body be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. 24Faithful is he that calleth you, who also will do it.

Now was Paul mistaken that entire sanctification would not take place till after death? He seems to think it would be before He returns, in this life, and also sticks his neck out by claiming that God who called them, promises to do it, and who can be relied on as He is faithful to His promises. The only requirement is faith from our side that He indeed speaks truth.

If the process was gradual his letters would not be so full of admonitions to be ye holy as He is holy, and would point to mans efforts not His power which is over all.
 

Hepzibah

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2012
1,377
1,034
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United Kingdom
It's beggars belief that some professing Christians embrace this heretical teaching that one can attain sinless perfection whilst in this body of death.

Paul destroyed that heresy in;

Romans 7:18 For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh) nothing good dwells; for to will is present with me, but how to perform what is good I do not find. 19 For the good that I will to do, I do not do; but the evil I will not to do, that I practice. 20 Now if I do what I will not to do, it is no longer I who do it, but sin that dwells in me.

Paul was indwelt by the Holy Spirit when he confirmed that sin also dwells in him and that it overcomes him, so he obeys it. So Paul was unable to conquer his sin nature, even with the help of the Holy Spirit, but we have these heretics making Paul out to be a liar.
I don't see us having a discussion if you call me a heretic, when during the first couple of hundred years, (and at times in the western church) the early church held to this doctrine, all the while refuting the real heresies coming in, like Arianism, Gnosticism and Deterministic theology.

Show me an early refute of Theosis, which is what they called it, and by the way, Paul was speaking as an un-Spirit baptized believer as he totally contradicts what he says in Romans 6:

1What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound? 2God forbid. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein? 3Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death? 4Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life. 5For if we have been planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection: 6Knowing this, that our old man is crucified with him, that the body of sin might be destroyed, that henceforth we should not serve sin. 7For he that is dead is freed from sin.
 
Last edited:

Christian Soldier

Well-Known Member
Jun 30, 2024
1,019
205
63
36
Sydney
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
I don't see us having a discussion if you call me a heretic, when during the first couple of hundred years, (and at times in the western church) the early church held to this doctrine, all the while refuting the real heresies coming in, like Arianism, Gnosticism and Deterministic theology.

Show me an early refute of Theosis, which is what they called it, and by the way, Paul was speaking as an un-Spirit baptized believer as he totally contradicts what he says in Romans 6:

1What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound? 2God forbid. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein? 3Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death? 4Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life. 5For if we have been planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection: 6Knowing this, that our old man is crucified with him, that the body of sin might be destroyed, that henceforth we should not serve sin. 7For he that is dead is freed from sin.
There were many heresies accepted and taught in the early Church, "Theosis" being one of them. But thank God, we have 2000 years of refinement behind us. We know far more today than any other generation before us, so todays Church enjoys the benefit of sound theology and doctrine.

I'm not sure why you look to the early Church for instruction, while ignoring the Apostolic Church, which never ever taught anything like Theosis. I never suggested that you're a heretic, I was referring to the doctrine of "Theosis" as being a heretical doctrine. I was also the victim of heretical doctrines, before God opened my eyes to know the truth.

I see you don't believe that Saul, received the Holy Spirit at his conversion on the road to Damascus. I don't know what your theology is founded upon, but it's not supported by Gods Word. I see you look to men in the early Church, instead of looking to Gods Word for instruction and correction.

Paul was most certainly indwelt by the Holy Spirit, when he confirmed that the law of sin dwells in his members and it overcomes him, in Romans 7:19-24
This in no way contradicts Romans 6, it actually supports it because Paul is making the point that Born Again Saints, don't have a license to sin. As an Elect Saint of God, I also struggle with the flesh, just as Paul did and I do sin everyday and I will sin for the rest of my life. But there's a big difference between the sins a Saint commits and the sins of an unbeliever.

As an Elect Saint of God, I have been born again and I have received the Holy Spirit and all of my past sins were forgiven and all of my current sins are being forgiven and all of my future sins are forgiven. Because the Lord Jesus Christ imputed His righteousness onto me. So God doesn't see my sin as sin because I am hid in Christ, but the sins of those who are not born again will be paid for by them in hell.

Paul wasn't saying that we are free from sin in Romans 6, he was saying we are free from the power of sin to condemn us. We are dead to sin, means sin has no dominion over us. We won't pay the penalty our sin deserves because Christ already paid for it.
Paul was exhorting Saints to wrestle against temptation and not to surrender to it. He never claimed that we would have the final victory over temptation in this life, that's why us Elect saints of God must put the whole armor of God on everyday. The enemy never rests, so neither can we.

There has never been a single person in the history of mankind who achieved "Theosis", so that idea remains in the realm of fantasy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Johann

Hepzibah

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2012
1,377
1,034
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United Kingdom
There were many heresies accepted and taught in the early Church, "Theosis" being one of them. But thank God, we have 2000 years of refinement behind us. We know far more today than any other generation before us, so todays Church enjoys the benefit of sound theology and doctrine.

I'm not sure why you look to the early Church for instruction, while ignoring the Apostolic Church, which never ever taught anything like Theosis. I never suggested that you're a heretic, I was referring to the doctrine of "Theosis" as being a heretical doctrine. I was also the victim of heretical doctrines, before God opened my eyes to know the truth.

I see you don't believe that Saul, received the Holy Spirit at his conversion on the road to Damascus. I don't know what your theology is founded upon, but it's not supported by Gods Word. I see you look to men in the early Church, instead of looking to Gods Word for instruction and correction.

Paul was most certainly indwelt by the Holy Spirit, when he confirmed that the law of sin dwells in his members and it overcomes him, in Romans 7:19-24
This in no way contradicts Romans 6, it actually supports it because Paul is making the point that Born Again Saints, don't have a license to sin. As an Elect Saint of God, I also struggle with the flesh, just as Paul did and I do sin everyday and I will sin for the rest of my life. But there's a big difference between the sins a Saint commits and the sins of an unbeliever.

As an Elect Saint of God, I have been born again and I have received the Holy Spirit and all of my past sins were forgiven and all of my current sins are being forgiven and all of my future sins are forgiven. Because the Lord Jesus Christ imputed His righteousness onto me. So God doesn't see my sin as sin because I am hid in Christ, but the sins of those who are not born again will be paid for by them in hell.

Paul wasn't saying that we are free from sin in Romans 6, he was saying we are free from the power of sin to condemn us. We are dead to sin, means sin has no dominion over us. We won't pay the penalty our sin deserves because Christ already paid for it.
Paul was exhorting Saints to wrestle against temptation and not to surrender to it. He never claimed that we would have the final victory over temptation in this life, that's why us Elect saints of God must put the whole armor of God on everyday. The enemy never rests, so neither can we.

There has never been a single person in the history of mankind who achieved "Theosis", so that idea remains in the realm of fantasy.
I see that you have failed to produce evidence that the early church refuted Theosis so I do not accept your view, and besides, Jude 1:3 tells us that:

'Beloved, while I was very diligent to write to you concerning our common salvation, I found it necessary to write to you exhorting you to contend earnestly for the faith which was once for all delivered to the saints.' which demolishes progressive Christianity.

If they did not refute it then they did not consider it heresy. Simple. At one time I was a Calvinist until God revealed the truth to me. I saw that the 'pricks' in my spirit were actually the Holy Spirit convicting me and not Satan as your theology will say. Your interpretation has been the reason for the downfall of the western church.

I do believe that Paul received the Holy Spirit on the road to Damascus, which demonstrates that you fail to understand where I am coming from. As for the rest of Romans 7:

"This can be referred to as “Speech in Character” (see Stanley Stowers, A Rereading of Romans, pp. 16-21). In this case, the “I” is not autobiographical, but is a device that allows the hearer or reader to experience/identify with someone’s situation (according to Stowers, the person can be real or imaginary, p. 17). In such cases, the writer is seeking to communicate “a general truth” (Longenecker, p. 655). Longenecker points out that this device was a common way of communicating in Paul’s day. He references Jewish sources (including Philo and the Dead Sea Scrolls), as well as Greco-Roman sources (including Euripides, Ovid, and Quintilian) to illustrate this frequent usage of “I”. Most convincing, is the fact that Paul uses “I” this way in other letters, and it is clear in these contexts that his reference is not autobiographical. One example, found in Romans itself, is 3:7: “If the truth of God is enhanced unto his glory by my falsehood, why am I also still condemned?” It is clear in the context that Paul is not referring to himself, but to a hypothetical individual who is raising this objection. Other passages include 1 Corinthians 6:15 ; 13:1-3 ; and Galatians 2:18 . Therefore, regarding Romans 7:14-25 , Longenecker argues convincingly (in my opinion) that Paul’s usage of “I” is not autobiographical, but rather a literary device common in the ancient world used to express a general truth."

Well I do believe that it is autobiographical in fact but not used for the present condition of Paul. He is recording a past experience but relating it to what others are experiencing as believers who have not been Spirit baptized after coming to Christ.

16 I say then: Walk in the Spirit, and you shall not fulfill the lust of the flesh. 17 For the flesh lusts against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh; and these are contrary to one another, so that you do not do the things that you wish. 18 But if you are led by the Spirit, you are not under the law. (Gal 5)

It seems that according to you that Paul was mistaken to think it possible:

23Now may the God of peace Himself sanctify you entirely and may your spirit and soul and body be preserved complete without blame at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. 24 Faithful is He who calls you and He also will bring it to pass. (1 Thess 5)

It is you who is living in fantasy. Oh and I don't look to the early church for instruction. The Holy Spirit does that for me, backed up by scripture.

 
Last edited:

Christian Soldier

Well-Known Member
Jun 30, 2024
1,019
205
63
36
Sydney
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
I see that you have failed to produce evidence that the early church refuted Theosis so I do not accept your view, and besides, Jude 1:3 tells us that:

'Beloved, while I was very diligent to write to you concerning our common salvation, I found it necessary to write to you exhorting you to contend earnestly for the faith which was once for all delivered to the saints.' which demolishes progressive Christianity.

If they did not refute it then they did not consider it heresy. Simple. At one time I was a Calvinist until God revealed the truth to me. I saw that the 'pricks' in my spirit were actually the Holy Spirit convicting me and not Satan as your theology will say. Your interpretation has been the reason for the downfall of the western church.

I do believe that Paul received the Holy Spirit on the road to Damascus, which demonstrates that you fail to understand where I am coming from. As for the rest of Romans 7:

"This can be referred to as “Speech in Character” (see Stanley Stowers, A Rereading of Romans, pp. 16-21). In this case, the “I” is not autobiographical, but is a device that allows the hearer or reader to experience/identify with someone’s situation (according to Stowers, the person can be real or imaginary, p. 17). In such cases, the writer is seeking to communicate “a general truth” (Longenecker, p. 655). Longenecker points out that this device was a common way of communicating in Paul’s day. He references Jewish sources (including Philo and the Dead Sea Scrolls), as well as Greco-Roman sources (including Euripides, Ovid, and Quintilian) to illustrate this frequent usage of “I”. Most convincing, is the fact that Paul uses “I” this way in other letters, and it is clear in these contexts that his reference is not autobiographical. One example, found in Romans itself, is 3:7: “If the truth of God is enhanced unto his glory by my falsehood, why am I also still condemned?” It is clear in the context that Paul is not referring to himself, but to a hypothetical individual who is raising this objection. Other passages include 1 Corinthians 6:15 ; 13:1-3 ; and Galatians 2:18 . Therefore, regarding Romans 7:14-25 , Longenecker argues convincingly (in my opinion) that Paul’s usage of “I” is not autobiographical, but rather a literary device common in the ancient world used to express a general truth."

Well I do believe that it is autobiographical in fact but not used for the present condition of Paul. He is recording a past experience but relating it to what others are experiencing as believers who have not been Spirit baptized after coming to Christ.

16 I say then: Walk in the Spirit, and you shall not fulfill the lust of the flesh. 17 For the flesh lusts against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh; and these are contrary to one another, so that you do not do the things that you wish. 18 But if you are led by the Spirit, you are not under the law. (Gal 5)

It seems that according to you that Paul was mistaken to think it possible:

23Now may the God of peace Himself sanctify you entirely and may your spirit and soul and body be preserved complete without blame at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. 24 Faithful is He who calls you and He also will bring it to pass. (1 Thess 5)

It is you who is living in fantasy. Oh and I don't look to the early church for instruction. The Holy Spirit does that for me, backed up by scripture.

Thank you for sharing your view and Stanley Stowers view, I don't agree with Stanleys interpretation of the book of Romans. I consider his interpretation as heresy, because it contradicts all the other passages which teach the bible doctrine of "original sin" and the bible doctrine of "total depravity".

Reformed theology requires the teaching of every scripture, to line up with what the rest of the bible has to say about that subject. I have considered your position and that of Mr. Stowers, and found that your views contradict so many other scriptures which deal with that doctrine.

As one who holds firmly to reformed theology, I demand that every scripture to be in harmony with the rest of the Bible. We don't throw any scriptures under the bus, when they seem to contradict other scriptures. We know there are no contradictions in the bible. So the problem is not with the bible, but it's with those who teach heresies.

Stanley Stowers, theology falls apart when we his interpretation with what the rest of the bible says. There is no such thing as theosis in the bible, none of those verses you referred to support this idea what so ever. you quoted verse 23 but it actually confirms that believers won't be sanctified until the coming of the Lord Jesus Christ, there is no suggestion this happen prior to His return anywhere in the bible.

23Now may the God of peace Himself sanctify you entirely and may your spirit and soul and body be preserved complete without blame at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.

Both you and Mr. Stowers have started with a false premise, then built a doctrine out of it. It's very clear to me, but I don't expect you to see the error because you can't see the forest from the trees, but I'm looking in from the outside and it's very clear to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Johann

Hepzibah

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2012
1,377
1,034
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United Kingdom
Thank you for sharing your view and Stanley Stowers view, I don't agree with Stanleys interpretation of the book of Romans. I consider his interpretation as heresy, because it contradicts all the other passages which teach the bible doctrine of "original sin" and the bible doctrine of "total depravity".

Reformed theology requires the teaching of every scripture, to line up with what the rest of the bible has to say about that subject. I have considered your position and that of Mr. Stowers, and found that your views contradict so many other scriptures which deal with that doctrine.

As one who holds firmly to reformed theology, I demand that every scripture to be in harmony with the rest of the Bible. We don't throw any scriptures under the bus, when they seem to contradict other scriptures. We know there are no contradictions in the bible. So the problem is not with the bible, but it's with those who teach heresies.

Stanley Stowers, theology falls apart when we his interpretation with what the rest of the bible says. There is no such thing as theosis in the bible, none of those verses you referred to support this idea what so ever. you quoted verse 23 but it actually confirms that believers won't be sanctified until the coming of the Lord Jesus Christ, there is no suggestion this happen prior to His return anywhere in the bible.

23Now may the God of peace Himself sanctify you entirely and may your spirit and soul and body be preserved complete without blame at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.

Both you and Mr. Stowers have started with a false premise, then built a doctrine out of it. It's very clear to me, but I don't expect you to see the error because you can't see the forest from the trees, but I'm looking in from the outside and it's very clear to me.

I refuse to interact with posters who show such rudeness and arrogance on top of low knowledge of debating rules.

These qualities I often find in Calvinists, or it seems exCalvinists, and I know as I was one.

I asked you twice to prove your accusation that the doctrine of Theosis is heretical by quoting where it is refuted by the early church or indeed anywhere in Orthodoxy (which I am not a part of). You ignored me. You will not find it.

I asked twice that Reformed Theology discussion does not take place on this thread. You ignored me.

It is not my remit to get into debates about Calvinism, and my studies do not center on it. Besides, others do it much better than me on this site.

I only quoted Stowers on Romans to show that other valid interpretations exist. I am sure that I disagree on most of what he says.

End of discussion.
 

Christian Soldier

Well-Known Member
Jun 30, 2024
1,019
205
63
36
Sydney
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
I refuse to interact with posters who show such rudeness and arrogance on top of low knowledge of debating rules.

These qualities I often find in Calvinists, or it seems exCalvinists, and I know as I was one.

I asked you twice to prove your accusation that the doctrine of Theosis is heretical by quoting where it is refuted by the early church or indeed anywhere in Orthodoxy (which I am not a part of). You ignored me. You will not find it.

I asked twice that Reformed Theology discussion does not take place on this thread. You ignored me.

It is not my remit to get into debates about Calvinism, and my studies do not center on it. Besides, others do it much better than me on this site.

I only quoted Stowers on Romans to show that other valid interpretations exist. I am sure that I disagree on most of what he says.

End of discussion.
I showed you several scriptures which expose your "Theosis" as heresy and you couldn't find any scriptures to support your heretical doctrine.

The difference between us, is you look to sinful man for your teaching and instruction, while I look to Gods Word for teaching and instruction. That is the big difference between our theologies. God didn't speak through some Greek Orthodox Monks, He spoke through His Prophets like the Apostle Paul.

I quote Gods Word and you insist tat the word of your Monks Trumps Gods Word, so you're right I can't have fellowship with those who deny Gods Word and embrace the teaching totally depraved sinners.

Every time I quoted Gods Word, you attempted to deny it and reject it and insist that your gurus know better. Good luck with that philosophy, you'll need lots of it :jest:
 

Bruce-Leiter

Well-Known Member
Sep 23, 2024
451
276
63
82
West Michigan
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
The doctrine we have been looking at - entire sanctification, and whether it is possible for man to be without sin in this life, was taught in the early church and called Theosis or Deification, and has been found in the west during the revival years and especially during the time of the Wesley's. The early church said that it occurs in three stages, but in the west, two stages generally though sometimes three, but it is not worth getting into disputes about it until the whole concept of holiness is understood.

This however requires that a person is seeking to know the truth rather than just having idle curiosity, and is willing to allow the Holy Spirit to reveal that it is truth, directly. It cannot come through human reasoning which gets in the way. I am greatly encouraged to see on this forum, signs that He is at work and has been giving revelations, on this most unusual forum, where this subject can be discussed freely.

After many years of reading, I know that nearly all or all other forums will stop the discussion out right so thank you @Wynona for this opportunity.


"These are the states of beginners, the state of progress, and the state of the perfect.
the {removed] into the "purgative way", the "illuminative way", and the "unitive way".

These consolations are often withdrawn, and a state of desolation ensues, and then the passive purification of the senses begins.

So ultimately purification, illumination, deification—it’s not the pursuit of enlightenment; it’s the pursuit of love: the love of God. It is the pursuit of a spiritual marriage, loving and receiving love. It is the marriage-feast, love being the wine that’s set forth on God’s table. In the deified man, it’s the man who is bathed in the light of God’s love to the point that it radiates from him. St. Isaac of Syria says:

God’s love is by its nature warmth. When it lights on someone without any limit, it plunges his soul into ecstasy. That is why the heart of one who has felt it cannot bear to be deprived of it, but he gradually undergoes a strange alteration in proportion to the love that enters into him. These are the signs of that love: His face becomes inflamed with joy, and his body is filled with warmth. Fear and shame desert him as if he had gone outside of himself.


This is the description of the Paul who says, “I know a man who was caught up into the third heaven, whether in the body or out of the body, I do not know.” httphttps://www.ancientfaith.com/specials/orthodox_spirituality/our_fulfillment_in_christ

Deification in the Early Church

In the introduction to The Study of Holiness from the Early Church Fathers by J. B. Galloway(Wipf and Stock Publishers, 2014), we read: “If the teachings of the modern holiness movement are correct concerning the doctrine of holiness and the baptism with the Holy Ghost as an experience for the saints of God today, perfecting them in Christian love and freeing them form carnal sin, it seems that we should find some evidences of this faith and teachings in the period of the history of the Church where it was the closest to the days of Christ”

“The commentator Adam Clarke objected that the opinion that Paul was speaking of a regenerate person ‘has most pitifully and most shamefully lowered the Standard of Christianity, and even destroyed its influence and disgraced its character.’ A.H. Francke and J. Bengel (and, a little later, John Wesley, and, later still Moses Stuart) were among those who thought that Paul was describing a man who was under conviction of sin, but not yet regenerate. “ Rom 7:24 – Who is the ‘wretched man’? – Walking With Giants

In his celebrated book Holiness, Ryle writes: ‘I am quite satisfied that it does not describe the experience of an unconverted man, or of a young and unestablished Christian; but of an old experienced saint in close communion with God. None but such a man could say, “I delight in the law of God after the inward man” (Rom. 7:22).’

The analysis of Christian development into these three ‘ways’ or phases derives from Dionysius the Pseudo-Areopagite, who ascribed a rhythm of purification, illumination, and union (or perfection) both to the hierarchies of angels and to the Church on earth. Medieval W. interpreters of Dionysius turned his scheme into an account of spiritual progress in terms of the three ways, beginning with the eradication of bad habits and the cultivation of the virtues, moving on to the illumination of the mind by meditation and contemplation, and culminating in unitive love. These three ways were adopted by later writers such as St John of the Cross and so became classic in systematic theories of Christian spirituality. purgative, illuminative, and unitive ways

St. Gregory Nazianzen, one of the great theologians of the fourth century, calls out to us over the centuries and exhorts us with the following. To quote St. Gregory: “Let us not remain what we are, but let us become what we once were.” And from St. Peter, the chief of the apostles, through the first-century voice of St. Ignatius of Antioch, from Irenaeus of the second century through the great Cappadocian Fathers of the fourth century, of the great Desert Fathers of the fifth century, Maximus the Confessor of the sixth century to John of Damascus and John of The Ladder in the ninth century, from Gregory Palamas in the 14th century to St. Silouan in the 20th century—the great Fathers of our Orthodox Church have echoed this exhortation of St. Gregory, reminding us and ever pointing us to the truth, that by God’s grace we can become much more than we are. [removed]
Show me where in the Bible we can become sinless in this life, and I'll consider it. However, if the Apostle Paul admits that he isn't perfect in Philippians 3 and Romans 7, I'm certainly not going to claim perfection. If I did that, I would become proud of my "perfection" and sin.
 

Hepzibah

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2012
1,377
1,034
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United Kingdom
Show me where in the Bible we can become sinless in this life, and I'll consider it. However, if the Apostle Paul admits that he isn't perfect in Philippians 3 and Romans 7, I'm certainly not going to claim perfection. If I did that, I would become proud of my "perfection" and sin.
Philippians 3 and Romans 7 are taken out of context, which is why you are stumbling. I have dealt with them on this thread already. On Romans 7, if you had been enlightened by the Holy Spirit you would see that Paul cried out for deliverance from the inability to stop unintentional sin, then received it in the next verse which is why he praised God. Otherwise you are contradicting the following:

Rom. 6:22 But now being made free from sin, and become servants to God, ye have your fruit unto holiness, and the end everlasting life.

1 John 1:7 But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship one with another, and the blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanseth us from all sin.

1John 3:4Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law. 5And ye know that he was manifested to take away our sins; and in him is no sin. 6Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen him, neither known him. 7Little children, let no man deceive you: he that doeth righteousness is righteous, even as he is righteous. 8He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil. 9Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God. 10In this the children of God are manifest, and the children of the devil: whosoever doeth not righteousness is not of God, neither he that loveth not his brother.

It is not possible that those who have gone through the trials before enlightenment to have any pride left in them at all. They will all insist that it is all of Him and nothing of themselves. Of course there will be those who are full of self righteousness. I am not speaking of those.

Today, in contrast, we have a church full of people who are proud to say they sin.
 

Christian Soldier

Well-Known Member
Jun 30, 2024
1,019
205
63
36
Sydney
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
Philippians 3 and Romans 7 are taken out of context, which is why you are stumbling. I have dealt with them on this thread already. On Romans 7, if you had been enlightened by the Holy Spirit you would see that Paul cried out for deliverance from the inability to stop unintentional sin, then received it in the next verse which is why he praised God. Otherwise you are contradicting the following:

Rom. 6:22 But now being made free from sin, and become servants to God, ye have your fruit unto holiness, and the end everlasting life.

1 John 1:7 But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship one with another, and the blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanseth us from all sin.

1John 3:4Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law. 5And ye know that he was manifested to take away our sins; and in him is no sin. 6Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen him, neither known him. 7Little children, let no man deceive you: he that doeth righteousness is righteous, even as he is righteous. 8He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil. 9Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God. 10In this the children of God are manifest, and the children of the devil: whosoever doeth not righteousness is not of God, neither he that loveth not his brother.

It is not possible that those who have gone through the trials before enlightenment to have any pride left in them at all. They will all insist that it is all of Him and nothing of themselves. Of course there will be those who are full of self righteousness. I am not speaking of those.

Today, in contrast, we have a church full of people who are proud to say they sin.
I've never heard of any born again believers, who are proud to say they sin. But my Church is full of people who mourn over their sin. We are proud to proclaim that all of our past present and future sins have already been paid for by Christ.
So our pride is in Him, we boast in Him.

So far from being proud to say we sin, we actually mourn over our sin, because we know we can't overcome it in this life. Jesus confirms this in Matt 5:4 Blessed are they that mourn: for they shall be comforted.

See, you can't find a single verse of scripture to support this silly idea that a born again believer can stop sinning, but I can give you a truck load of scriptures which confirm the fact.
 

Hepzibah

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2012
1,377
1,034
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United Kingdom
I've never heard of any born again believers, who are proud to say they sin. But my Church is full of people who mourn over their sin. We are proud to proclaim that all of our past present and future sins have already been paid for by Christ.
So our pride is in Him, we boast in Him.

So far from being proud to say we sin, we actually mourn over our sin, because we know we can't overcome it in this life. Jesus confirms this in Matt 5:4 Blessed are they that mourn: for they shall be comforted.

See, you can't find a single verse of scripture to support this silly idea that a born again believer can stop sinning, but I can give you a truck load of scriptures which confirm the fact.
If this were so, there would be no reason why God has an issue with His children.

You can find many scriptures that seem to say that we cannot stop sinning and at the same time find many that say we must, like 'be ye perfect as your heavenly Father is perfect'. It is futile to argue this way. But we should take into account the types and shadows from the OT, like the cleansing of the temple etc to show that this is the truth of the gospel, well documented in the early church and taught at times since, and the reason why revival breaks out.

What is in our hearts will show which side we are on. Scripture is amazing like this. This guides our interpretation and the reason why there are so many brands. This is where satan fools the church and is the great deception.

I have genuine sorrow for you.
 

Christian Soldier

Well-Known Member
Jun 30, 2024
1,019
205
63
36
Sydney
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
If this were so, there would be no reason why God has an issue with His children.

You can find many scriptures that seem to say that we cannot stop sinning and at the same time find many that say we must, like 'be ye perfect as your heavenly Father is perfect'. It is futile to argue this way. But we should take into account the types and shadows from the OT, like the cleansing of the temple etc to show that this is the truth of the gospel, well documented in the early church and taught at times since, and the reason why revival breaks out.

What is in our hearts will show which side we are on. Scripture is amazing like this. This guides our interpretation and the reason why there are so many brands. This is where satan fools the church and is the great deception.

I have genuine sorrow for you.
But this is so, because God doesn't have any issue with His children. The sins of His past, present and future children have all been paid in full by Jesus, so all of us Elect Saints of God can enjoy life known we are fully justified and we will never be punished for our past, present or future sins. This is exactly what the Bible teaches.

I don't agree with your opinion regarding "many scriptures seeming to say something". Scriptures never seem to say anything. Everything is "Yes" or "No", there are no maybe's in God Word. You can't change what God said by adding your private interpretation to it. Every scripture must line up with what the rest of the Bible says about that particular doctrine.

The reason we have 45,000 Christian Denominations, claiming their particular interpretation is the only correct one, is because they have all departed from the original gospel message. Most of them invented a new gospel, in order to turn their local Church into a money making business. They all teach, that there is no salvation outside of their denomination so they hold their congregation hostage to their false doctrine.

Christians are supposed to conform themselves to what God Word commands. But the Dominations have forced Gods Word to conform to the theology they invented.
You're right, it is futile to argue by pitting scripture against scripture. Doing this would mean arguing against ones private interpretation, we can't study the bible if we approach the scriptures with our presuppositions, that is to say with our minds already made up before we start.

Nobody starts out with a sound theology, we all learn the hard way. We all start out with our minds made up ad we expect God to live up to all of our preconceived ideas about what God must be like, and we we come across some hard doctrines, we naturally twist them to make them acceptable to us.
Like yourself, I also couldn't accept the bible doctrine of original sin being inherited by every single person since Adam, nor did I accept that attaining sinless perfection in this life is impossible. But I eventually had to abandon my wisdom and put my trust in the Lord, and simply accept everything He said.

We are not called to figure out why God does what He does, we are commanded to simply trust and obey Him. We're not qualified to put God on trial and judge Him, when He doesn't do it our way.
 

Runningman

Active Member
Dec 3, 2023
547
233
43
39
Southeast
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
The doctrine we have been looking at - entire sanctification, and whether it is possible for man to be without sin in this life, was taught in the early church and called Theosis or Deification, and has been found in the west during the revival years and especially during the time of the Wesley's. The early church said that it occurs in three stages, but in the west, two stages generally though sometimes three, but it is not worth getting into disputes about it until the whole concept of holiness is understood.

This however requires that a person is seeking to know the truth rather than just having idle curiosity, and is willing to allow the Holy Spirit to reveal that it is truth, directly. It cannot come through human reasoning which gets in the way. I am greatly encouraged to see on this forum, signs that He is at work and has been giving revelations, on this most unusual forum, where this subject can be discussed freely.

After many years of reading, I know that nearly all or all other forums will stop the discussion out right so thank you @Wynona for this opportunity.


"These are the states of beginners, the state of progress, and the state of the perfect.
the {removed] into the "purgative way", the "illuminative way", and the "unitive way".

These consolations are often withdrawn, and a state of desolation ensues, and then the passive purification of the senses begins.

So ultimately purification, illumination, deification—it’s not the pursuit of enlightenment; it’s the pursuit of love: the love of God. It is the pursuit of a spiritual marriage, loving and receiving love. It is the marriage-feast, love being the wine that’s set forth on God’s table. In the deified man, it’s the man who is bathed in the light of God’s love to the point that it radiates from him. St. Isaac of Syria says:

God’s love is by its nature warmth. When it lights on someone without any limit, it plunges his soul into ecstasy. That is why the heart of one who has felt it cannot bear to be deprived of it, but he gradually undergoes a strange alteration in proportion to the love that enters into him. These are the signs of that love: His face becomes inflamed with joy, and his body is filled with warmth. Fear and shame desert him as if he had gone outside of himself.


This is the description of the Paul who says, “I know a man who was caught up into the third heaven, whether in the body or out of the body, I do not know.” httphttps://www.ancientfaith.com/specials/orthodox_spirituality/our_fulfillment_in_christ

Deification in the Early Church

In the introduction to The Study of Holiness from the Early Church Fathers by J. B. Galloway(Wipf and Stock Publishers, 2014), we read: “If the teachings of the modern holiness movement are correct concerning the doctrine of holiness and the baptism with the Holy Ghost as an experience for the saints of God today, perfecting them in Christian love and freeing them form carnal sin, it seems that we should find some evidences of this faith and teachings in the period of the history of the Church where it was the closest to the days of Christ”

“The commentator Adam Clarke objected that the opinion that Paul was speaking of a regenerate person ‘has most pitifully and most shamefully lowered the Standard of Christianity, and even destroyed its influence and disgraced its character.’ A.H. Francke and J. Bengel (and, a little later, John Wesley, and, later still Moses Stuart) were among those who thought that Paul was describing a man who was under conviction of sin, but not yet regenerate. “ Rom 7:24 – Who is the ‘wretched man’? – Walking With Giants

In his celebrated book Holiness, Ryle writes: ‘I am quite satisfied that it does not describe the experience of an unconverted man, or of a young and unestablished Christian; but of an old experienced saint in close communion with God. None but such a man could say, “I delight in the law of God after the inward man” (Rom. 7:22).’

The analysis of Christian development into these three ‘ways’ or phases derives from Dionysius the Pseudo-Areopagite, who ascribed a rhythm of purification, illumination, and union (or perfection) both to the hierarchies of angels and to the Church on earth. Medieval W. interpreters of Dionysius turned his scheme into an account of spiritual progress in terms of the three ways, beginning with the eradication of bad habits and the cultivation of the virtues, moving on to the illumination of the mind by meditation and contemplation, and culminating in unitive love. These three ways were adopted by later writers such as St John of the Cross and so became classic in systematic theories of Christian spirituality. purgative, illuminative, and unitive ways

St. Gregory Nazianzen, one of the great theologians of the fourth century, calls out to us over the centuries and exhorts us with the following. To quote St. Gregory: “Let us not remain what we are, but let us become what we once were.” And from St. Peter, the chief of the apostles, through the first-century voice of St. Ignatius of Antioch, from Irenaeus of the second century through the great Cappadocian Fathers of the fourth century, of the great Desert Fathers of the fifth century, Maximus the Confessor of the sixth century to John of Damascus and John of The Ladder in the ninth century, from Gregory Palamas in the 14th century to St. Silouan in the 20th century—the great Fathers of our Orthodox Church have echoed this exhortation of St. Gregory, reminding us and ever pointing us to the truth, that by God’s grace we can become much more than we are. [removed]
True, but you're only touching the tip of the iceberg about what the early church thought about God, Jesus and who they could become. That may be why "nearly all or all other forums will stop the discussion out right." It's because they may already be keen about where the discussion will inevitably end up. It'll end up not with Jesus being God, but with Jesus being the example of what we can become.

There is a lot to say about the similarities between Jesus and what his followers can become. For starters, to address the point you made. Not only did Jesus believe people can stop sinning (he told this to people) but others also believed they could stop sinning. They believed they, too, could be filled with the fullness of God and partake of the divine nature. They could not only be a child of God in the token sense of the phrase, but actually God's offspring, i.e., begotten, because Jesus was teaching people they must be born from above. The miracles Jesus did they wanted to do, forgive sins like he did, and so much more. They could walk in his footsteps, suffer with him, and they even wanted to die like him. They believed they could be resurrected to immortality and also be raptured to heaven. All just like Jesus. It doesn't even stop there. They could sit on the same throne as Jesus, rule the nations, judge the world, inherit whatever he did. It's all Scriptural, too.

Things have changed a lot since then. It's because The Way is actually not an easy way and doesn't attract people in the most general sense, but that is how it is designed. It is designed to be a filter that sorts the weeds from the wheat. Only those who love Jesus and his God will submit to this sort of selfless sacrificial life to deny themselves, take up their cross, and follow him. That's what real Christianity is all about. Of course, nowadays, there are no shortage of doctrines and teachings that enable people to justify keeping their sin and not even trying. Nowadays so many people are of the hyper grace variety. They just simply believe and reject any sort of self-effort as an affront to the sacrifice of Jesus. Work out your own salvation with fear and trembling. God will sort us out in the end.
 
  • Love
  • Like
Reactions: marks and Hepzibah

Hepzibah

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2012
1,377
1,034
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United Kingdom
But this is so, because God doesn't have any issue with His children. The sins of His past, present and future children have all been paid in full by Jesus, so all of us Elect Saints of God can enjoy life known we are fully justified and we will never be punished for our past, present or future sins. This is exactly what the Bible teaches.

I don't agree with your opinion regarding "many scriptures seeming to say something". Scriptures never seem to say anything. Everything is "Yes" or "No", there are no maybe's in God Word. You can't change what God said by adding your private interpretation to it. Every scripture must line up with what the rest of the Bible says about that particular doctrine.

The reason we have 45,000 Christian Denominations, claiming their particular interpretation is the only correct one, is because they have all departed from the original gospel message. Most of them invented a new gospel, in order to turn their local Church into a money making business. They all teach, that there is no salvation outside of their denomination so they hold their congregation hostage to their false doctrine.

Christians are supposed to conform themselves to what God Word commands. But the Dominations have forced Gods Word to conform to the theology they invented.
You're right, it is futile to argue by pitting scripture against scripture. Doing this would mean arguing against ones private interpretation, we can't study the bible if we approach the scriptures with our presuppositions, that is to say with our minds already made up before we start.

Nobody starts out with a sound theology, we all learn the hard way. We all start out with our minds made up ad we expect God to live up to all of our preconceived ideas about what God must be like, and we we come across some hard doctrines, we naturally twist them to make them acceptable to us.
Like yourself, I also couldn't accept the bible doctrine of original sin being inherited by every single person since Adam, nor did I accept that attaining sinless perfection in this life is impossible. But I eventually had to abandon my wisdom and put my trust in the Lord, and simply accept everything He said.

We are not called to figure out why God does what He does, we are commanded to simply trust and obey Him. We're not qualified to put God on trial and judge Him, when He doesn't do it our way.
As I said, I will not debate a Calvinist.

The hardest doctrine of all, and the one which folk hate so much in the early church's teaching, is that God requires a walk like that of Jesus (Theosis) and that the result of not doing so is laid out in,

Hebrews 6:4 For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost,

5 And have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come,

6 If they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame.

You will of course say they were not saved to start with. You have been brainwashed by western theology brought in by Augustine.
 

Christian Soldier

Well-Known Member
Jun 30, 2024
1,019
205
63
36
Sydney
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
As I said, I will not debate a Calvinist.

The hardest doctrine of all, and the one which folk hate so much in the early church's teaching, is that God requires a walk like that of Jesus (Theosis) and that the result of not doing so is laid out in,

Hebrews 6:4 For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost,

5 And have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come,

6 If they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame.

You will of course say they were not saved to start with. You have been brainwashed by western theology brought in by Augustine.
This heretical doctrine called (Theosis) is not supported by any scriptures at all. You tried to use Heb 6:4-6 to support this heretical doctrine, but those verses don't deal with the sins of a believer. They only say that nobody can be saved then lose their salvation at a later stage.

We know that saved people do commit sins like murder and adultery, but they don't lose their salvation because a believer is only saved once. Jesus came for this very reason, He came t atone for the past, present and future sins of His Elect Saints. So there is no sin which His Saints commit which Christ has not already paid for.

You won't find a single verse in the bible to support your doctrine, and you won't find a single verse in the bible to refute my doctrine. You won't debate a Calvinist, because you lose every time :jest:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Johann

Hepzibah

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2012
1,377
1,034
113
Faith
Christian
Country
United Kingdom
I don't know whether, @Christian Soldier , you want to wind me up or whether you do not have the mental capacity to remember what I tell you about myself and beliefs, neither of which bode well for any further discussion between us.

I was a 5-Point Calvinist for approx. 8 years, and defended the doctrine and Calvin himself. Oh dear, I feel so bad about it now. I read all the top writers and read all the top books.

Then, I began to notice a few things. One was that all the church members were intellectual middle/upper class who had known comfortable lives. Few if any deprived, abused members that I saw of which group I belonged.

Reformed theology would have me believe that it was God's will that I was severely ill at 10 months through mercury poisoning and that I grew up as the scapegoat in a narcissistic family system and it was God's desire for me to be molested by an uncle and grow up emotionally, physically and psychologically too damaged to function normally, marrying abusive men twice..

Then I got to find out how much cherry picking of verses went on, and how plain words like, the world, all, everyone were twisted to mean something else and the cat was out of the bag.

To top it all off, I heard that Calvin taught that God, for His own good pleasure, allows some men to think they are saved when in fact they are not.

Yes I can quote you many texts that SEEM to back up the theology, taken out of context and many texts that show entire sanctification for God's people, taken IN context but I am not going to waste my time.
 
Last edited:
  • Love
Reactions: GodsGrace