Lambano
Well-Known Member
And how do you change what humans really are inside?ou have to address what picks the gun up.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
And how do you change what humans really are inside?ou have to address what picks the gun up.
Our founding fathers were blessed by God. George Washington was shown the future history of America by an angel. Firearms are an essential part of this country securing freedom from a tyrannical government. The simple matter is we would not have the freedoms in this country if we were not armed. But we have gotten so far from God I think the blessing is slipping away. I don’t see America in the Bible so who knows what will happen here.
Our founding fathers were blessed by God. George Washington was shown the future history of America by an angel. Firearms are an essential part of this country securing freedom from a tyrannical government. The simple matter is we would not have the freedoms in this country if we were not armed. But we have gotten so far from God I think the blessing is slipping away. I don’t see America in the Bible so who knows what will happen here.
And how do you change what humans really are inside?
Jim B, this is far from shear nonsense. What a rude thing to say.Aside from your first sentence, everything else is sheer nonsense. Even the first sentence is just a matter of opinion.
Jim B, this is far from shear nonsense. What a rude thing to say.
And how do you change what humans really are inside?
You don't find violent self defense in the New Testament because the subject never came up. Bear in mind, one doesn't need to defend what is already commonly accepted and understood.Again, you will be hard pressed to find any doctrine teaching violent self defense in the New Testament. Many try to use Luke 22:36 as justification for this but they don’t understand that the following lesson with the sword involving Peter in Matthew 26:47-56 was one of non-violence because Jesus rebuked Peter in five different ways for taking up the sword. So the sword was a lesson in Non-Violence and not Violence. In fact, after Peter’s sword blunder incident, you will not find the disciples even having swords let alone them even using them for violent self defense reasons as many of you falsely imply or suggest. Read Acts of the Apostles. You will find no swords. This makes sense because the disciples were beaten (Acts of the Apostles 5:40), and Stephen was stoned (Acts of the Apostles 7). These events in Scripture would not make sense if they had swords. The only way that swords would make sense in these kinds of narratives is if they were invisible swords that would materialize when they needed them, and or the swords existed in some kind of pocket dimension that they could access at any time they wanted.
Right. But inside the US, the role of government is to guard and secure our rights. Any law that impinges on our rights is illegal and unconstitutional.Governments should be there to protect all their citizens. it should not be up to each of us. This is how the real world outside the US does things!
What's that in the hand of the Queen's guard? A broom?We will offer you a total gun free country :cool:
Where have you been?Off topic, but when did the government force anyone to get a vaccine?
Where have you been?
Shear nonsenseYou have your opinion; I have mine.
"George Washington was shown the future history of America by an angel." opinion only
"Firearms are an essential part of this country securing freedom from a tyrannical government." opinion only
"The simple matter is we would not have the freedoms in this country if we were not armed." opinion only
"But we have gotten so far from God I think the blessing is slipping away." opinion only
"I don’t see America in the Bible so who knows what will happen here." opinion only
You don't find violent self defense in the New Testament because the subject never came up. Bear in mind, one doesn't need to defend what is already commonly accepted and understood.
Right, George Washington was a Mason. Masonry is not biblical. So its no surprise he thought in unbiblical terms (like many here) on the matter of Jesus teaching Non-Violence.