Because we can always learn from others in the body of Christ. However, we can learn just as easily through our own personal reading and the other is not really even needed.
This is such the haughty spirit, bruh. No wonder your theology is so off kilter.
Um, "bruh" ;), I think that I was merely stating almost verbatim what is contained in the verses referenced. So your issue is with the verses. You think that taking the Bible at face value will produce a haughty spirit, then I think that your premise is "off-kilter".
Mine isn't.
You go by the teachings of men; I go by the teaching of what the holy scripture says to me at any given moment.
I try to stay open to what the Holy Spirit might want to say to me at any given moment.
And He certainly does not tell me to agree to a doctrine that would lead people to feel that they do not need to place their faith and trust in Jesus Christ for their salvation.
But if grace comes before faith, then faith isn't necessary.
Look at it from the perspective of an evangelist.
If the unbelieving mind would take a doctrine as saying that they can have salvation apart from Jesus Christ (even faith in Him); then that doctrine is detrimental to that person coming to know Jesus Christ through a saving faith in Him.
That person can resist placing their faith in Jesus Christ with extra power behind their reasoning, saying that they can be saved apart from faith in Jesus Christ, since grace comes before faith according to Calvinistic theology.
If Calvinism be true, then the unbeliever need not place his or her faith in Christ; they will be saved or lost based on God's predetermined choice regardless of whether there is any faith on their part.
Because grace comes first and not as the result of faith; and therefore faith is not necessary for salvation.
However, these ideas are contrary to what the holy scripture teaches.