- Feb 24, 2015
- 1,765
- 439
- 83
- Faith
- Christian
- Country
- United States
It was over slander, not over doctrine, and I expected you would deny this or ignore it, in confirmation of what I was saying. But so everyone else knows, this is why. You and I don't drink of one and the same Spirit too often, because you don't hesitate to engage in character assassination, which is something I'm not comfortable with. Just as well that I kept my word and moved on.
Blessings,
Hidden
Point out the slander, brother. As it is as per His words, any saved believer in iniquity is a worker of iniquity. Words that identify with that iniquity, assigns the iniquity to the owner of those words as being of that iniquity.
Matthew 12:35 A good man out of the good treasure of the heart bringeth forth good things: and an evil man out of the evil treasure bringeth forth evil things.36 But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment.37 For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned.
Matthew 15:18 But those things which proceed out of the mouth come forth from the heart; and they defile the man.19 For out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, blasphemies:20 These are the things which defile a man:
So go ahead and quote the slander AND in what regards that I had slandered towards what you had said for what you had considered slander. I cannot be "corrected" nor can any christian be corrected when you leave that "allegation" unsubstantiated.
If the slander is that character assassination by assigning you to that apostasy, then you heard the saying.. if it quacks like a duck and walks like a duck, it is a duck. I would be remiss if I did not point out that you are saying the same things as those you do not like to be identified with, but you are.
If you were among them, I would like to see how you can correct them when you use the same rudiment as they are for what you believe is not of Him and that you do not wish to be "lumped" in with those you openly disagree with and yet... what is the difference between the two when your "blessing" and their "chaos" are achieved by the same methodology?
Therefore I defend the faith by saying there is no other receiving of the Holy Spirit for the believer because if there was, there would be no way to test the spirits at all when you ignore the reality that Jesus Christ is in you and therefore you are not receiving Him again in according to our faith in Him.
That phenomenon you had valued as happening to you later in life as a saved believer was not of Him, and neither was that tongue that it had brought, brother.