Surviving Roman Catholic Heresies in Protestantism

[GerhardEbersoehn]

I am not a Catholic, but I'm tired of this kind of thing. I appeal to you too to apply:

Philippians 4:8 Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good report; if there be any virtue, and if there be any praise, think on these things.

See, the Protestant, too <tired> to say 'I am a Protestant' only, <not a Catholic> ... but Catholic more than a Roman Catholic I tell you!

And your alternative to <apply>, Q~Why not start a thread about the saints? I'd love one that told us about each saint on the calendar. We all might profit by learning about their lives. I think there is other good you could talk about -- some are things others might find valuable, even if they're not Catholic. Give us something good to think about.~Q, sucks. 'Suck' - 'easily deceived or swindled' -- not me, 'softy'.

 

[Giuliano]

See, the Protestant, too <tired> to say 'I am a Protestant' only, <not a Catholic> ... but Catholic more than a Roman Catholic I tell you!

And your alternative to <apply>, Q~Why not start a thread about the saints? I'd love one that told us about each saint on the calendar. We all might profit by learning about their lives. I think there is other good you could talk about -- some are things others might find valuable, even if they're not Catholic. Give us something good to think about.~Q, sucks. 'Suck' - 'easily deceived or swindled' -- not me, 'softy'.

I take it that you do not see the value in what Paul wrote.

Are you here trying to prove what a tough guy you are? I hope not. If you are, you need mental help; and I hope people here take that into account and don't abuse you. Anyone can act like a tough guy online. Go get help.

 

[GerhardEbersoehn]

Brilliant! You are repeating what I said! There is hope! Why did you list "Sunday" as a Catholic heresy?No, you don't. That's the most honest thing you have said in this Catholic bashing thread.

done

 

[GerhardEbersoehn]

I take it that you do not see the value in what Paul wrote.

Are you here trying to prove what a tough guy you are? I hope not. If you are, you need mental help; and I hope people here take that into account and don't abuse you. Anyone can act like a tough guy online. Go get help.

done

 

[GerhardEbersoehn]

Surviving Roman Catholic Heresies in Protestantism

Free-will
Sunday
Blood
Cross

...for now.

I concluded with the 'Cross'-- with Jesus' victorious entering into and passing through, crossing the Red Sea Out of Egypt LAND OF DARKNESS without LIGHT as much as one Christmas candle or HOPE as much as one day beyond hell.

 

[bbyrd009]

Sine prole

would be the latin confusion of the concept i guess, yeh

cant imagine what the connetion to Cyrene might be though?
Other than our leaders keep killing all their children, i mean

 

[GerhardEbersoehn]

cant imagine what the connetion to Cyrene might be though?

No connection! That's what 'sine prole' means.

 

[bbyrd009]

No connection! That's what 'sine prole' means.

how can you be so sure? And why do you speak in witch-talk? no offense

 

[Willie T]

Uh...…… It means you have no children.

 

[GerhardEbersoehn]

Uh...…… It means you have no children.

'sine prole' ≠ British slang. 'sine prole' = Latin irrelevant senseless nonsense

 

[Willie T]

'sine prole' ≠ British slang. 'sine prole' = Latin irrelevant senseless nonsense

Don't let yourself get too hooked-up on colloquial slang. (Brits distort it to mean "there is no point")... But, the Latin means "without issue" = He died 'sine prole' at a young age. In many other countries, people would look at you strangely for trying to interject such an inappropriate slang meaning.

 

[GerhardEbersoehn]

Don't let yourself get too hooked-up on colloquial slang. (Brits distort it to mean "there is no point")... But, the Latin means "without issue" = He died 'sine prole' at a young age. In many other countries, people would look at you strangely for trying to interject such an inappropriate slang meaning.

The inappropriate knowledge went to YOUR HEAD. And YOU don't let yourself get too hooked-up on colloquial slang. I wrote no inappropriate British slang, but the appropriate Latin, 'sine prole', a 'Law', 'phrase', with the appropriate - decent - English meaning of, 'without issue' or 'without relevance' or 'without connection with the subject' or 'without issue / connection with the relevant case'--- my learned maestro...

 

[GerhardEbersoehn]

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=2442251706061915&set=a.1556096604677434&type=3&theater

 

[Willie T]

The inappropriate knowledge went to YOUR HEAD. And YOU don't let yourself get too hooked-up on colloquial slang. I wrote no inappropriate British slang, but the appropriate Latin, 'sine prole', a 'Law', 'phrase', with the appropriate - decent - English meaning of, 'without issue' or 'without relevance' or 'without connection with the subject' or 'without issue / connection with the relevant case'--- my learned maestro...

Boy, you ARE hooked-up on slang meanings. "Inappropriate" is not a dirty inference. It means "something that doesn't fit the present situation or context."

 

[GerhardEbersoehn]

Boy, you ARE hooked-up on slang meanings. "Inappropriate" is not a dirty inference. It means "something that doesn't fit the present situation or context."

As the Republicans say of Biden, <We HAVE that video!>

 

[GerhardEbersoehn]

More Roman Catholic dead heresies in Protestantism DENYING ...

Christ "made Sacrifice of Himself" and "poured out his Soul", "making atonement for sin", "without the shedding of blood" .

“The only one who had to accept the atoning work of Christ, was the Father, not us.” James White.

What need had the Father of Jesus' blood if "He offered up HIMSELF"?!

“You have neither desired nor taken pleasure in sacrifices and offerings .. Behold, I have come to do your will .. by that Will we have been sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all .. without shedding of blood”

By that "WILL" the Father "desired" Jesus' "SOUL poured out"—nothing less.

Christ "made Sacrifice of Himself" and "poured out his Soul", "making atonement for sin", "without the shedding of blood".

 

[Windmill Charge]

What evidence do you want? Scripture I did give? Well then, here it is again:

John 19:17
καὶ βαστάζων ἑαυτῷ τὸν σταυρὸν ἐξῆλθεν εἰς τὸν
And he bearing his cross went forth [out of the building] unto

λεγόμενον Κρανίου τόπον, ὃ (ὃς) λέγεται Ἑβραϊστὶ Γολγοθᾶ,
a place called of a skull which is called in the Hebrew Golgotha.
[Levitikus 23:22,10c]

Mark 15:21
καὶ ἀγγαρεύουσιν παράγοντά … ἐρχόμενον ἀπ’ ἀγροῦ, …
And they compelled one Simon a Cyrenian, coming from the land,

τινα Σίμωνα Κυρηναῖον … τὸν πατέρα Ἀλεξάνδρου καὶ Ῥούφου …
the father of Alexander and Rufus,

ἵνα ἄρῃ τὸν σταυρὸν αὐτοῦ.
purposed to / THAT he might bear his cross.

Matthew 27:32
Ἐξερχόμενοι δὲ εὗρον ἄνθρωπον Κυρηναῖον, ὀνόματι
And as they came out, they found a man of Cyrene,

Σίμωνα· τοῦτον ἠγγάρευσαν ἵνα ἄρῃ τὸν σταυρὸν αὐτοῦ.
Simon by name: him they sent /directed, to bear his cross.

Luke 23:26
Καὶ ὡς ἀπήγαγον αὐτόν, ἐπιλαβόμενοι Σίμωνά τινα Κυρηναῖον
And as / while they led him away, they laid hold upon one Simon, a Cyrenian,

ἐρχόμενον ἀπ’ ἀγροῦ, ἐπέθηκαν αὐτῷ τὸν σταυρὸν
coming out of the country, and on him they laid the cross,

φέρειν ὄπισθεν τοῦ Ἰησοῦ.
that he might bear it further on after Jesus.

Sorry you have not proved your claim.
All you have provided evidence for is that Simon carried the cross for Jesus.
The scripture does not say when Jesus stopped carrying the cross or when Simon started to carry the cross.
That it happened is not in dispute, just the unscriptural details.

 

[GerhardEbersoehn]

Sorry you have not proved your claim.
All you have provided evidence for is that Simon carried the cross for Jesus.
The scripture does not say when Jesus stopped carrying the cross or when Simon started to carry the cross.
That it happened is not in dispute, just the unscriptural details.

You have not read the Scriptural details.

1) <<evidence that Simon carried the cross for Jesus>>, which is all of <just the scriptural details>.

2) So who carried Jesus’ cross? Simon of Sirene did—

3) from the start from outside the door all the way,

4) who was divinely ‘forced’

5) the pre-ordained “messenger”,

6) to “take off-route”

7) to “pick up” his ‘parcel for delivery’, Jesus’ cross,

8) for which he had to leave behind his initial ‘parcel’ the Passover- “first sheaf offering”

9) which he “cut off the corners of his land”,

10) and “brought before the Priest” Jesus the Christ who would

11) “wave it before the LORD”.

— All <Scriptural details> you miss and keep ignoring because it does not fit YOUR unscriptural picture—diabolical Roman Catholic UNSCRIPTURAL picture—,

— all <Scriptural details> YOU, ARE NOT EQUIPPED TO SEE IN THE GOSPELS’ TRUE ACCOUNT (the Greek).

 

[Windmill Charge]

You have not read the Scriptural details.

1) <<evidence that Simon carried the cross for Jesus>>, which is all of <just the scriptural details>.

2) So who carried Jesus’ cross? Simon of Sirene did—

3) from the start from outside the door all the way,

4) who was divinely ‘forced’

5) the pre-ordained “messenger”,

6) to “take off-route”

7) to “pick up” his ‘parcel for delivery’, Jesus’ cross,

8) for which he had to leave behind his initial ‘parcel’ the Passover- “first sheaf offering”

9) which he “cut off the corners of his land”,

10) and “brought before the Priest” Jesus the Christ who would

11) “wave it before the LORD”.

— All <Scriptural details> you miss and keep ignoring because it does not fit YOUR unscriptural picture—diabolical Roman Catholic UNSCRIPTURAL picture—,

— all <Scriptural details> YOU, ARE NOT EQUIPPED TO SEE IN THE GOSPELS’ TRUE ACCOUNT (the Greek).

The only scriptual evidence you have is that Simon carried Jesus's cross. the rest is catholic invention.

 

[epostle]

The only scriptual evidence you have is that Simon carried Jesus's cross. the rest is catholic invention.

The Way of the Cross (Via Dolorosa) was burned in the minds and hearts of eye witnesses, it's authenticity was preserved long before it was written down, and it is impossible to have each detail written down. There is nothing in Scripture that says all the authentic beliefs and practices must be explicitly found in Scripture. That is a Protestant invention.