Sola Scriptura, where the Reformation Failed.

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Hobie

Well-Known Member
Jun 11, 2009
3,524
1,308
113
South Florida
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I had this in my notes but have lost them somehow, and searched for a while and finally came across the explanation...
' Sola scriptura.

Martin Luther and his contemporaries claimed this Latin phrase, meaning “Scripture alone,” was the basis for their efforts to reform Catholicism and reject the authority of the pope and Catholic tradition.

Unfortunately, a major problem arose: they couldn’t fully agree on what and how to reform. Some wanted to move fast with sweeping reforms; others wanted to move slowly. Some wanted limited crosses and icons; others believed all icons were wrong. Some believed in infant baptism; others, only adult baptism. Some believed the Eucharistic bread was Christ’s body; others believed it represented Christ’s body. The disagreements went on and on, which is why there are thousands of Protestant denominations today.

But, despite these divisions, there is one belief the reformers almost unanimously agreed on. In this, they did not break with the Roman Church: They upheld Sunday as the day of worship.

The problem with Sunday​

But maintaining Sunday created a huge problem Protestants still live with to this day. Simply put, it fundamentally broke with the concept of sola scriptura. The Bible shows that Jesus, the apostles and the early Church all observed the seventh-day Sabbath (Luke 4:16, 31; Acts 17:2-3; Acts 18:4). So, if one was to rely solely on Scripture to decide doctrine, one would worship on the seventh day.

To find the origin of Sunday worship, one has to consult extrabiblical history, which shows Sunday was gradually adopted (by some) beginning in the mid-second century. The first written evidence of Sunday worship is from a document written by Justin Martyr around A.D. 150. One of the primary motivations for the change to Sunday was a desire to not appear “Jewish.” In fact, early in its history, the Roman Church even imposed a weekly Saturday fast to show “contempt for the Jews” who observed the Sabbath as a feast (Kenneth Strand, ed., The Sabbath in Scripture and History, 1982, pp. 137-138).

In A.D. 321 Constantine the Great officially established Sunday as the day of rest throughout the Roman Empire. Constantine had been a devout sun worshipper most of his life, which might help explain why he enshrined dies solis (the day of the sun) as the official day of worship.

The history of Sunday is not a secret. To its credit, the Catholic Church is very honest about making this change. John A. O’Brien, in his book on Catholic theology, The Faith of Millions: The Credentials of the Catholic Religion, states the Catholic belief: “The Church received the authority to make such a change from her Founder, Jesus Christ. … The Church did not change the divine law obliging men to worship, but merely changed the day on which such public worship was to be offered” (1974, p. 400, emphasis added). Many other Catholic sources say the same thing.

Secular history and the Roman Church agree on this point: It was the Catholic Church that changed the Christian day of worship from the seventh day to Sunday—not the Bible. To see more evidence of this, read “When and How Did the Change in Worship From Saturday to Sunday Occur?
 
  • Love
Reactions: Brakelite

Hobie

Well-Known Member
Jun 11, 2009
3,524
1,308
113
South Florida
Faith
Christian
Country
United States

The reformers and the Sabbath​

Now, back to the Reformation. As we have already seen, the reformers challenged many practices of Rome—while leaving Sunday untouched. But it wasn’t because they never considered the issue.

At the same time, there was a small movement that emerged from the Anabaptists in Silesia and Moravia advocating a return to the seventh-day Sabbath. Martin Luther, Huldrych Zwingli and John Calvin were aware of the Sabbatarians (as they were called), but all adamantly opposed them.

In a letter about fellow reformer Andreas Karlstadt (who had Sabbatarian leanings), Luther wrote: “Yes, if Karlstadt were to write more about the Sabbath, even Sunday would have to give way, and the Sabbath, that is Saturday, would be celebrated. He would truly make us Jews in all things, so that we also would have to be circumcised, etc.” (Against the Heavenly Prophets, 1525).

It’s interesting that Luther distinguished Sunday from the Sabbath, which he understood was on Saturday. Luther’s view was that the Sabbath was part of the ceremonial law for Jews and not binding on Christians. He maintained Sunday as the day of formal worship—but resisted it being considered obligatory or equated with the Fourth Commandment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brakelite

Hobie

Well-Known Member
Jun 11, 2009
3,524
1,308
113
South Florida
Faith
Christian
Country
United States

A challenge for Protestants​

Though Protestant literature usually tries to justify Sunday observance with selected scriptures, this is a smokescreen for the historical reality that Rome, not the Bible, was responsible for the change. Catholic apologists have often used the discrepancy between sola scriptura and Sunday worship to chide Protestants. Notice these two examples:

From The Faith of Millions:

“But since Saturday, not Sunday, is specified in the Bible, isn’t it curious that non-Catholics who profess to take their religion directly from the Bible and not from the Church, observe Sunday instead of Saturday? Yes, of course, it is inconsistent; but this change was made … centuries before Protestantism was born. …

“They have continued the custom, even though it rests upon the authority of the Catholic Church and not upon an explicit text in the Bible. That observance remains as a reminder of the Mother Church from which the non-Catholic sects broke away” (pp. 400-401).

Many Catholic apologists will quote the archbishop of Reggio who, at the Council of Trent, said:

“The written word explicitly enjoins the observance of the seventh day as the Sabbath. They do not observe the seventh day, but reject it. If they do truly hold the Scripture alone as their standard, they would be observing the seventh day as is enjoined in the Scripture throughout. Yet they not only reject the observance of the Sabbath enjoined in the written word, but they have adopted and do practise the observance of Sunday, for which they have only the tradition of the [Catholic] Church. Consequently the claim of ‘Scripture alone as the standard,’ fails; and the doctrine of ‘Scripture and tradition’ as essential, is fully established, the Protestants themselves being judges” (quoted, for instance, in Rome’s Challenge: Why Do Protestants Keep Sunday? 1995, p. 23).

The above quotes accurately express the Reformation’s greatest failure. Protestantism was founded on the premise of replacing Catholic tradition with sola scriptura, yet maintained one of the most significant changes the Catholic Church made to Scripture. Had the reformers seriously applied sola scriptura, they would have rejected Sunday and restored the seventh-day Sabbath.

Every weekend, when millions of Protestants work on Saturday and go to church on Sunday, they are unwittingly acquiescing to the authority of the Catholic Church rather than the Bible.'....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brakelite

Jack

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2022
11,410
4,675
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Ain't no Sabbath COMMANDS in the New Covenant. NONE! Sabbath COMMANDS were only for Israel.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mailmandan

Taken

Well-Known Member
Feb 6, 2018
27,358
14,801
113
United States
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
@Hobie ~ thanks for sharing from your studies.

It is my understanding…in brief;
Once Jesus established HIS Church, he sent his chosen disciples out to preach to the tribes of Israel.
The preaching aside from corners, homes, was commonly done in willing synagogues, whereby those of Jewish faith, and Gentiles first gathered in a mix of Jews & Gentiles…
* Gentiles learning about God & Jesus.
* Jews learning about Jesus’s identity.
The gathering … on Saturday.
The gathering … inclusion of women, was different for the Jews, whereas historically in Temple, was primarily for men.

I presume, speculate, those in attendance were eager to hear, anxious, full of questions, and where Scripture speaks of women being silent in the Church, was IMO, likely more so a directive to Gentile women, (yappy interested, asking rather than quietly with patience, listening).

Within a “short time”… Pressure (possibly even personal threats) from Jews at large, Steeped in the OT, who could not BELIEVE, Jesus (while popular, while interesting, JUST NOT the KING Messiah, they imagined a seemingly nobody of importance) toward Synagogue's preaching JESUS the Messiah…

As the Synagogue’s ceased from Preaching JESUS…

What about the Jews…who DID believe IN Jesus their Messiah…?
Did they continue meeting in Synagogues ON Saturday to participate in their traditions…and then meet along with Gentiles on Sunday, as they established Churches…so they (Jews) who believed could continue hearing about Jesus?

Just speculating…imo there were Jews who wanted … not either or…but knowledge and teaching of both God and Jesus.

What is your opinion on that consideration?

Glory to God,
Taken
 

Rockerduck

Well-Known Member
Nov 7, 2022
2,512
2,142
113
70
Marietta, Georgia.
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
The reformation was about going back to the word of God as authority, and not the Roman Church. Reforming back to the way the church was. The Roman cathodic church is not even a shadow of what it used to be before Martin Luther. The Catholic church is completely reformed today.
 

Matthias

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2022
19,485
13,542
113
Kentucky
Faith
Other Faith
Country
United States
The Reformation didn’t go far enough. That’s what produced the Radical Reformation. And that is what produced the Counter Reformation.
 

Hobie

Well-Known Member
Jun 11, 2009
3,524
1,308
113
South Florida
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
@Hobie ~ thanks for sharing from your studies.

It is my understanding…in brief;
Once Jesus established HIS Church, he sent his chosen disciples out to preach to the tribes of Israel.
The preaching aside from corners, homes, was commonly done in willing synagogues, whereby those of Jewish faith, and Gentiles first gathered in a mix of Jews & Gentiles…
* Gentiles learning about God & Jesus.
* Jews learning about Jesus’s identity.
The gathering … on Saturday.
The gathering … inclusion of women, was different for the Jews, whereas historically in Temple, was primarily for men.

I presume, speculate, those in attendance were eager to hear, anxious, full of questions, and where Scripture speaks of women being silent in the Church, was IMO, likely more so a directive to Gentile women, (yappy interested, asking rather than quietly with patience, listening).

Within a “short time”… Pressure (possibly even personal threats) from Jews at large, Steeped in the OT, who could not BELIEVE, Jesus (while popular, while interesting, JUST NOT the KING Messiah, they imagined a seemingly nobody of importance) toward Synagogue's preaching JESUS the Messiah…

As the Synagogue’s ceased from Preaching JESUS…

What about the Jews…who DID believe IN Jesus their Messiah…?
Did they continue meeting in Synagogues ON Saturday to participate in their traditions…and then meet along with Gentiles on Sunday, as they established Churches…so they (Jews) who believed could continue hearing about Jesus?

Just speculating…imo there were Jews who wanted … not either or…but knowledge and teaching of both God and Jesus.

What is your opinion on that consideration?

Glory to God,
Taken
The Early Church worshipped on Sabbath, all the Christians, Jews and Gentiles. It was only in Rome where they allowed the pagans to come in but keep their day of the sun for worship...
 

Taken

Well-Known Member
Feb 6, 2018
27,358
14,801
113
United States
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
The Early Church worshipped on Sabbath, all the Christians, Jews and Gentiles. It was only in Rome where they allowed the pagans to come in but keep their day of the sun for worship...

The Early Church worshiped in Synagogues…ON the traditional Sabbath day, Jews held their meetings.

Jews AND Gentiles were each learning SOMETHING new to them…
Jews Learning of the arrival of their Messiah.
Gentiles Learning of the Jewish God AND of the Jewish Messiah and His arrival.

Those being called “christians” by men who had no belief IN Jesus being the Messiah of the Jewish God…were men following the Teachings of Jesus…and SOME coming into the Belief, that Jesus IS the Christ Messiah of God, sent by God to Earth.

After the Jewish Apostles began dying off, and abrupt change … (pressure from the Pharisees)….began in the Synagogues to stop preaching Jesus was the. Christ Messiah….attempting to restore the Synagogues back to following the traditional Hebrew and Jewish father’s …. And thus Gentiles began not attending Synagogues..

Homes, common buildings, erected building began to become the meeting places called “churches”…with an express focus on the teaching of the Jewish God and His Messiah, ChristJesus.

The primary focus being ON the one God SENT…TO teach, reveal, offer and effect Salvation for those who want it and those Willing to DO what God requires for a man to RECEIVE Salvation.

It is Honor and Tribute unto JESUS’ offering, “christians” Put their trust and faith to do Gods WILL according to Gods WILL…

SUNDAY…SONDAY…First day of the Week
is the DAY Jesus ROSE UP…Back from the DEAD, His Presence revealed…

I have NO ISSUE setting aside SUNDAY…the SONS day of revealing Himself ALIVE…as being an “inappropriate” day to gather with other believers IN Christ, to praise, honor, thank, remember, and worship Him.

(And BTW…Gentiles were never “given” a law directing THEM to keep or remember the Jewish Sabbath day.) Not in the OT, Not in the NT.

Glory to God,
Taken
 

Pavel Mosko

Member
Dec 19, 2021
138
53
28
57
Boyertown
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I had this in my notes but have lost them somehow, and searched for a while and finally came across the explanation...
' Sola scriptura.

Martin Luther and his contemporaries claimed this Latin phrase, meaning “Scripture alone,” was the basis for their efforts to reform Catholicism and reject the authority of the pope and Catholic tradition.

Unfortunately, a major problem arose: they couldn’t fully agree on what and how to reform. Some wanted to move fast with sweeping reforms; others wanted to move slowly. Some wanted limited crosses and icons; others believed all icons were wrong. Some believed in infant baptism; others, only adult baptism. Some believed the Eucharistic bread was Christ’s body; others believed it represented Christ’s body. The disagreements went on and on, which is why there are thousands of Protestant denominations today.

But, despite these divisions, there is one belief the reformers almost unanimously agreed on. In this, they did not break with the Roman Church: They upheld Sunday as the day of worship.

The problem with Sunday​

But maintaining Sunday created a huge problem Protestants still live with to this day. Simply put, it fundamentally broke with the concept of sola scriptura. The Bible shows that Jesus, the apostles and the early Church all observed the seventh-day Sabbath (Luke 4:16, 31; Acts 17:2-3; Acts 18:4). So, if one was to rely solely on Scripture to decide doctrine, one would worship on the seventh day.

To find the origin of Sunday worship, one has to consult extrabiblical history, which shows Sunday was gradually adopted (by some) beginning in the mid-second century. The first written evidence of Sunday worship is from a document written by Justin Martyr around A.D. 150. One of the primary motivations for the change to Sunday was a desire to not appear “Jewish.” In fact, early in its history, the Roman Church even imposed a weekly Saturday fast to show “contempt for the Jews” who observed the Sabbath as a feast (Kenneth Strand, ed., The Sabbath in Scripture and History, 1982, pp. 137-138).

In A.D. 321 Constantine the Great officially established Sunday as the day of rest throughout the Roman Empire. Constantine had been a devout sun worshipper most of his life, which might help explain why he enshrined dies solis (the day of the sun) as the official day of worship.

The history of Sunday is not a secret. To its credit, the Catholic Church is very honest about making this change. John A. O’Brien, in his book on Catholic theology, The Faith of Millions: The Credentials of the Catholic Religion, states the Catholic belief: “The Church received the authority to make such a change from her Founder, Jesus Christ. … The Church did not change the divine law obliging men to worship, but merely changed the day on which such public worship was to be offered” (1974, p. 400, emphasis added). Many other Catholic sources say the same thing.

Secular history and the Roman Church agree on this point: It was the Catholic Church that changed the Christian day of worship from the seventh day to Sunday—not the Bible. To see more evidence of this, read “When and How Did the Change in Worship From Saturday to Sunday Occur?

There is no problem with Sunday. It is the day of the Resurrection, the day the Holy Spirit was given to the Church, the day of worship prophetically illustrated in many Old Testament rituals, offerings, festivals regarding the 8th day in old Judaism. Furthermore, nor do we have any formal days of worship mandated by the Apostles, because if they were that would have been recorded in the book of Acts or at least one of the Pauline or Catholic epistles.

This is all problem in the mind of Seventh day Adventism and it's "Present Truth", "Three Angels" Gospel, a gospel that is substantially different than the original Gospel preached by the Apostles, which is something that EGW and Adventists in their various publications sometimes note themselves (because they supposedly got "new light" aka revelation that previous Christians did not have). Unfortunately, most Adventists do not possess the insight to realize how that belief is an inherent Biblical problem for reasons spelled out in such verses as:

Galatians 1:6-8, Only One Gospel​

6 I marvel that you are turning away so soon from Him who called you in the grace of Christ, to a different gospel, 7 which is not another; but there are some who trouble you and want to pervert[a] the gospel of Christ. 8 But even if we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel to you than what we have preached to you, let him be [b]accursed.


Colossians 2:16-17
Therefore no one is to act as your judge in regard to food or drink or in respect to a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath day— things which are a mere shadow of what is to come; but the substance belongs to Christ.


Jude 1​

3 Dear friends, although I was very eager to write to you about the salvation we share, I felt compelled to write and urge you to contend for the faith that was once for all entrusted to God’s holy people.


Matthew 16:18 English Standard Version​

18 And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock[a] I will build my church, and the gates of hell[b] shall not prevail against it.


Ephesians 4:14-16 King James Version​

14 That we henceforth be no more children, tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men, and cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive;
15 But speaking the truth in love, may grow up into him in all things, which is the head, even Christ:
16 From whom the whole body fitly joined together and compacted by that which every joint supplieth, according to the effectual working in the measure of every part, maketh increase of the body unto the edifying of itself in love.
 
Last edited:

Pavel Mosko

Member
Dec 19, 2021
138
53
28
57
Boyertown
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Hebrews 4
sigh
If you're suggesting that as a proof text for Sabbath keeping your going to have to do better than that. Acts 15, the Colossians verse cited etc. are all more specific than that. "Entering the sabbath rest of God" has largely been seen as entering the peace of God as an act of Faith. To make it about Sabbath Keeping would be going against saint Paul and Acts 15, and some other passages because it would basically be saying that the Judaizers were right on at least this narrow subject.


Besides all that, we know this is not the case Historically speaking. You do not have the early Christians bearing witness to it. These are the same people who gave us the books that would be in the New Testament and were discipled by the Apostles. This itself should be a cause for consideration because "In the mouth of 2 or 3 witnesses" cases are established is a major scriptural principle that occurs 13 throughout entire canon 12 to 13 times.



Ignatius of Antioch, epistle to Magnesians,

Chapter 10. Beware of Judaizing​

Let us not, therefore, be insensible to His kindness. For were He to reward us according to our works, we should cease to be. Therefore, having become His disciples, let us learn to live according to the principles of Christianity. For whosoever is called by any other name besides this, is not of God. Lay aside, therefore, the evil, the old, the sour leaven, and be changed into the new leaven, which is Jesus Christ. Be salted in Him, lest any one among you should be corrupted, since by your savour you shall be convicted. It is absurd to profess Christ Jesus, and to Judaize. For Christianity did not embrace Judaism, but Judaism Christianity, that so every tongue which believes might be gathered together to God.
 

PS95

Well-Known Member
Jun 16, 2024
1,019
632
113
Eastern Shore
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
If you're suggesting that as a proof text for Sabbath keeping your going to have to do better than that. Acts 15, the Colossians verse cited etc. are all more specific than that. "Entering the sabbath rest of God" has largely been seen as entering the peace of God as an act of Faith. To make it about Sabbath Keeping would be going against saint Paul and Acts 15, and some other passages because it would basically be saying that the Judaizers were right on at least this narrow subject.


Besides all that, we know this is not the case Historically speaking. You do not have the early Christians bearing witness to it. These are the same people who gave us the books that would be in the New Testament and were discipled by the Apostles. This itself should be a cause for consideration because "In the mouth of 2 or 3 witnesses" cases are established is a major scriptural principle that occurs 13 throughout entire canon 12 to 13 times.



Ignatius of Antioch, epistle to Magnesians,

Chapter 10. Beware of Judaizing​

Let us not, therefore, be insensible to His kindness. For were He to reward us according to our works, we should cease to be. Therefore, having become His disciples, let us learn to live according to the principles of Christianity. For whosoever is called by any other name besides this, is not of God. Lay aside, therefore, the evil, the old, the sour leaven, and be changed into the new leaven, which is Jesus Christ. Be salted in Him, lest any one among you should be corrupted, since by your savour you shall be convicted. It is absurd to profess Christ Jesus, and to Judaize. For Christianity did not embrace Judaism, but Judaism Christianity, that so every tongue which believes might be gathered together to God.
what? it is a proof text for sabbath resting from our works. Im not SDA.
 

Pavel Mosko

Member
Dec 19, 2021
138
53
28
57
Boyertown
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
what? it is a proof text for sabbath resting from our works. Im not SDA.

Well, I was going to lay out various kinds of theological principles and terms coming from the Bible, and ancient Christianity, but I'm going to give the short and sweet answer and say that you won't find one. This will probably sound like Circular Reasoning, and you certainly can write it off as that if you want to. I'm not here to persuade you because that is a bit like the famous saying about "leading a horse to water" but not being able to make them drink. You can certainly believe that Hebrews 4 is about some kind of literal sabbath keeping, and the ancient Church somehow got it all wrong until modern Sabbatarian groups came along starting with the Seven Day Baptists in the 1600s.


But back to your question, from my perspective you would need some kind of admonition for sabbath keeping in preferably the New Testament or at least if your take on Hebrews 4 is right you would need some of statement from the Apostolic Fathers or very early Christian sources that this vague and contested interpretation of the passage is right by saint Paul or another Apostle similar to the other instructions he gives in regards to Communion, the gift of Tongues and prophecy, wearing headcoverings in church by women, Church discipline and Excommunication etc. Or at the very least have ancient witnesses from such folks like Apostolic Fathers, or other ancient sources like Justin Martyr who end up confirming that this verse deals with this ancient heresy or apostasy of the folks who abandoned or corrupted the ancient Apostolic practice of Sabbath Keeping.


I will add there is some reverence for the sabbath coming from Liturgical and Sacramental Christianity coming from ancient times. This is where we get "the weekend" from. That isn't an accident, that the end of the work week just happens to start on the Jewish Sabbath, but there is definitely a tonal difference in it. I mean I try to take Saturday off to rest as much as I can, but I'm not sweating things about not "kindling fires" and other Old Testament Mitzvot just resting from work and trying to spend more time on spiritual matters to be even more blessed and grounded before the start of the new week.
 
Last edited:

PS95

Well-Known Member
Jun 16, 2024
1,019
632
113
Eastern Shore
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Well, I was going to lay out various kinds of theological principles and terms coming from the Bible, and ancient Christianity, but I'm going to give the short and sweet answer and say that you won't find one. This will probably sound like Circular Reasoning, and you certainly can write it off as that if you want to. I'm not here to persuade you because that is a bit like the famous saying about "leading a horse to water" but not being able to make them drink. You can certainly believe that Hebrews 4 is about some kind of literal sabbath keeping, and the ancient Church somehow got it all wrong until modern Sabbatarian groups came along starting with the Seven Day Baptists in the 1600s.


But back to your question, from my perspective you would need some kind of admonition for sabbath keeping in preferably the New Testament or at least if your take on Hebrews 4 is right you would need some of statement from the Apostolic Fathers or very early Christian sources that this vague and contested interpretation of the passage is right by saint Paul or another Apostle similar to the other instructions he gives in regards to Communion, the gift of Tongues and prophecy, wearing headcoverings in church by women, Church discipline and Excommunication etc. Or at the very least have ancient witnesses from such folks like Apostolic Fathers, or other ancient sources like Justin Martyr who end up confirming that this verse deals with this ancient heresy or apostasy of the folks who abandoned or corrupted the ancient Apostolic practice of Sabbath Keeping.


I will add there is some reverence for the sabbath coming from Liturgical and Sacramental Christianity coming from ancient times. This is where we get "the weekend" from. That isn't an accident, that the end of the work week just happens to start on the Jewish Sabbath, but there is definitely a tonal difference in it. I mean I try to take Saturday off to rest as much as I can, but I'm not sweating things about not "kindling fires" and other Old Testament Mitzvot just resting from work and trying to spend more time on spiritual matters to be even more blessed and grounded before the start of the new week.
I still dont know what your problem is. lol leading a horse to water? I dont keep any one day in particular as a sabbath day. I have already told you this.
Hebrews 4 teaches the opposite of one day. Haven't you read it? Do you not understand it? Are you Catholic?
When we rest in Christ from our works- we are in sabbath rest.- daily
The sabbath was a shadow. Christ is the reality. Hebrews 4 isnt arguing with Col- it compliments it.

I'm not here to argue over this. If someone wants to hold a day above another- that's up to them. I have no problem with that.
What is wrong though is when SDA's start judging believers over it. Which IS what they do. Which is one reason why I could never be SDA.
 

Pavel Mosko

Member
Dec 19, 2021
138
53
28
57
Boyertown
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I still dont know what your problem is. lol leading a horse to water? I dont keep any one day in particular as a sabbath day. I have already told you this.
Hebrews 4 teaches the opposite of one day. Haven't you read it? Do you not understand it? Are you Catholic?
When we rest in Christ from our works- we are in sabbath rest.- daily
The sabbath was a shadow. Christ is the reality. Hebrews 4 isnt arguing with Col- it compliments it.

I'm not here to argue over this. If someone wants to hold a day above another- that's up to them. I have no problem with that.
What is wrong though is when SDA's start judging believers over it. Which IS what they do. Which is one reason why I could never be SDA.

Yes I completely agree with what you say. In the last two years, I have dealt with many sabbath keepers, especially SDA, quoting verses as proof texts for sabbath keeping. Even conflating such passages as John 14:15 "If you love me you will keep my commandments" as a proof text for that (rather than his personal commands of showing mercy, forgiving, putting others before ourselves etc.). Sorry for the mix up.

 

Hobie

Well-Known Member
Jun 11, 2009
3,524
1,308
113
South Florida
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
There is no problem with Sunday. It is the day of the Resurrection, the day the Holy Spirit was given to the Church, the day of worship prophetically illustrated in many Old Testament rituals, offerings, festivals regarding the 8th day in old Judaism. Furthermore, nor do we have any formal days of worship mandated by the Apostles, because if they were that would have been recorded in the book of Acts or at least one of the Pauline or Catholic epistles.

This is all problem in the mind of Seventh day Adventism and it's "Present Truth", "Three Angels" Gospel, a gospel that is substantially different than the original Gospel preached by the Apostles, which is something that EGW and Adventists in their various publications sometimes note themselves (because they supposedly got "new light" aka revelation that previous Christians did not have). Unfortunately, most Adventists do not possess the insight to realize how that belief is an inherent Biblical problem for reasons spelled out in such verses as:

Galatians 1:6-8, Only One Gospel​

6 I marvel that you are turning away so soon from Him who called you in the grace of Christ, to a different gospel, 7 which is not another; but there are some who trouble you and want to pervert[a] the gospel of Christ. 8 But even if we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel to you than what we have preached to you, let him be [b]accursed.


Colossians 2:16-17
Therefore no one is to act as your judge in regard to food or drink or in respect to a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath day— things which are a mere shadow of what is to come; but the substance belongs to Christ.


Jude 1​

3 Dear friends, although I was very eager to write to you about the salvation we share, I felt compelled to write and urge you to contend for the faith that was once for all entrusted to God’s holy people.


Matthew 16:18 English Standard Version​

18 And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock[a] I will build my church, and the gates of hell[b] shall not prevail against it.


Ephesians 4:14-16 King James Version​

14 That we henceforth be no more children, tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men, and cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive;
15 But speaking the truth in love, may grow up into him in all things, which is the head, even Christ:
16 From whom the whole body fitly joined together and compacted by that which every joint supplieth, according to the effectual working in the measure of every part, maketh increase of the body unto the edifying of itself in love.
None of that is true, it is pagan origin, everyone knows it and soon will see its results as the mark...