You keep numbly repeating that Christ is the end of the law. I have show you from Strong’s, JFB and Barnes that the Greek word translated end does not mean end as we use it today…The stumbling block for Raeneske is the "Law of Christ". He doesn't understand what it is.
Jesus is the end of the Law for those who believe in Him.
G5056
τέλος
telos
tel'-os
From a primary word τέλλω tellō (to set out for a definite point or goal); properly the point aimed at as a limit, that is, (by implication) the conclusion of an act or state (termination [literally, figuratively or indefinitely], result [immediate, ultimate or prophetic], purpose); specifically an impost or levy (as paid): - + continual, custom, end (-ing), finally, uttermost. Compare G5411.
Christ is the goal or point of aim the law, the result of the law. He was the conclusion of an act or state. The conclusion of living the law is Christ.
OK, what is the law of Christ?The law of course still exists if they want to put themselves under it or if a Christian allows himself to be "bewitched" as Paul puts it and then they will fall from grace. Because they did not receive the Spirit by the works of the law. They received the Spirit by faith if indeed they received the Spirit. I have always thought that Paul's selection of the word "bewitched" was a divine inspiration because you can show someone the simplicity of the God's word yet they act like they are under a spell and just cannot break free from it.
The Law that Believers are under is the Law of Christ. I will explain that further down. Actually, the Bible explains it.
Mat 19:16 And, behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life?
Mat 19:17 And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.
Mat 19:18 He saith unto him, Which? Jesus said, Thou shalt do no murder, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness,
Christ says here that the Commandments are necessary and then He goes on to show He is speaking of the Ten Commandments. Who gave those Commandments?
Joh 5:37 And the Father himself, which hath sent me, hath borne witness of me. Ye have neither heard his voice at any time, nor seen his shape.
Wasn’t the Father.
Exo 20:1 And God spake all these words, saying,
Exo 20:19 And they said unto Moses, Speak thou with us, and we will hear: but let not God speak with us, lest we die.
Who’s voice did they hear?
1Co 10:1 Moreover, brethren, I would not that ye should be ignorant, how that all our fathers were under the cloud, and all passed through the sea;
1Co 10:2 And were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea;
1Co 10:3 And did all eat the same spiritual meat;
1Co 10:4 And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ.
Christ! He gave the Ten Commandments on Mt. Sinai. He also said…
Mat 5:17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Mat 5:18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
Mat 5:19 Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
Not one jot or tittle will pass until all is fulfilled. No let me ask you a question, has all been fulfilled? Has Christ returned? Has Rev 20 taken place? How about the New Jerusalem, has it come down to earth? So have the laws passed?
Did Christ do away with the His own laws? Remember He gave them and then put people to death for not keeping them. So now, oh well, He just does away with them and sorry for your luck? What kind of a Christ do think He is? A Christ of serendipity? Of Caprice? He plainly says…
Mal 3:6 For I am the LORD, I change not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed.
Heb 13:8 Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever.
Jesus Christ had wisdom and understanding beyond the human level. What He did here was to reveal that this rich young ruler had a serious issue. First, Christ named the second great command, love your neighbor as yourself, denoted by the last six Commandments. The rich young ruler said I have kept those. Then Christ says sell all your possessions and follow me. He knew the young man had another god before God, his possessions. So now, to make everything OK, you would have Christ do away with the law and that way the young man is no longer guilty. There is no problem now with putting wealth before God because that law doesn’t exit anymore? Did Christ just excuse him saying, “That’s OK fellow, I’ll just do away with the law and you can worship your gold.”Christ was born under the law and preached to those under the law. He pretty much showed the rich young ruler that though he thought he was keeping the commandments, he really was not and could not.
Matt_19:22 But when the young man heard that saying, he went away sorrowful: for he had great possessions.
This may have been the first time in this young man's life that he ever understood that he could not keep the law and that he was greedy and covetous. Jesus was demonstrating that the law cannot bring life and that the strength of sin is the law.
And in the following, you are adding your own words in. That is not what Christ said, what He said was if you will be perfect (look up the word perfect and you will find it means complete) put God ahead of your wealth. He also was offering him a discipleship. The young man refused it because he would not put God ahead of His wealth. If the law was truly done away, it would not have mattered.Gal_3:21 Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.
1Co_15:56 The sting of death is sin; and the strength of sin is the law.
Regarding the rich young ruler:
Matt_19:21 Jesus said unto him, If thou wilt be perfect, go and sell that thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come and follow me.
So, if thou wilt be perfect under the law,
Again, a little word study is in order. Perfect here means complete…then you must be perfect in the law just like Jesus was and this is an impossibility. You cannot have law and grace at the same time. That is spiritual adultery. Read Romans 7:1-4. Hopefully, the realization that you cannot be perfect will cause you to fall upon the mercy of God, which is Jesus Christ and let His Spirit work in you rather than you working by the flesh to accomplish your checklist each day.
G5046
τέλειος
teleios
tel'-i-os
From G5056; complete (in various applications of labor, growth, mental and moral character, etc.); neuter (as noun, with G3588) completeness: - of full age, man, perfect.
I find it odd that one who would obey the 7th Commandment is committing spiritual adultery.
I can understand why you are having trouble with this passage, pulling verses out of context can cause that.Lockstep? From Paul: Gal_4:21 Tell me, ye that desire to be under the law, do ye not hear the law?
Gal 2:3 But neither Titus, who was with me, being a Greek, was compelled to be circumcised:
Gal 2:4 And that because of false brethren unawares brought in, who came in privily to spy out our liberty which we have in Christ Jesus, that they might bring us into bondage:
Gal 2:5 To whom we gave place by subjection, no, not for an hour; that the truth of the gospel might continue with you.
Gal 2:6 But of these who seemed to be somewhat, (whatsoever they were, it maketh no matter to me: God accepteth no man's person:) for they who seemed to be somewhat in conference added nothing to me:
Gal 2:7 But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter;
Gal 2:8 (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles:)
Gal 2:9 And when James, Cephas, and John, who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that was given unto me, they gave to me and Barnabas the right hands of fellowship; that we should go unto the heathen, and they unto the circumcision.
Now refer back to Acts 15 which you want also pull out of context, what was the subject of Acts 15?
Act 15:1 And certain men which came down from Judaea taught the brethren, and said, Except ye be circumcised after the manner of Moses, ye cannot be saved.
Act 15:2 When therefore Paul and Barnabas had no small dissension and disputation with them, they determined that Paul and Barnabas, and certain other of them, should go up to Jerusalem unto the apostles and elders about this question.
Act 15:3 And being brought on their way by the church, they passed through Phenice and Samaria, declaring the conversion of the Gentiles: and they caused great joy unto all the brethren.
Act 15:4 And when they were come to Jerusalem, they were received of the church, and of the apostles and elders, and they declared all things that God had done with them.
Act 15:5 But there rose up certain of the sect of the Pharisees which believed, saying, That it was needful to circumcise them, and to command them to keep the law of Moses.
They were teaching that justification comes from keeping the law and not from Christ and the law they were concerned with was not “Remember the Sabbath day to keep it holy”, it was circumcision.
And that is the entirety of Paul’s statement here? Again, lifting text to support your position is not proper…The verse before is this: Rom_13:8 Owe no man any thing, but to love one another: for he that loveth another hath fulfilled the law.
Rom 13:8 Owe no man any thing, but to love one another: for he that loveth another hath fulfilled the law.
Rom 13:9 For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if there be any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
Love your neighbor is the summing of the last six Commandments, just as love God is the summation of the first four Commandments and these two great Commandments are summed up as the law of love.
That is correct, but if you do commit adultery, you have broken that law of love by violating the 7th Commandment. If there is no Commandment against adultery, then if your wife entertains the milkman, you have nothing to say because she did not break any law. Now if there is no law, there is no sin…Tell me something, if you love others with the love of God, will you commit adultery, kill, steal, bear false witness or covet?
Rom 4:15 Because the law worketh wrath: for where no law is, there is no transgression.
(gotta wait for someone else to post, I am exceeding the blocks, too long winded.) To be continued...