When did Trump get deprived of a legal right?
I think the real problem is people do not understand the law and what is a criminal act, ie down to the police to prosecute and what a private individual can take to court. If a law is broken, then the authorities as in the police, or FBI can take someone to court over this issue. If a private citizen takes someone to court, that individual has to have suffered loss personally as a result of the offenders behaviour, which the court can consider redress.
It is clear that finding a point of law that has caused loss to individuals has been the problem.
So for instance, in emergency situations an official has power to take immediate action. The action may affect a process or a group of people, but if no loss or harm can be found then there is nothing for the courts to remedy. If the action is in regard to an issue over which there is no law, then again the courts cannot remedy, as the courts themselves decide legal matters alone.
Putting in place martial law, does not change the legal framework for prosecutions or sense of injustice.
So for instance if one claims there are x number of illegal aliens who voted who should not have voted, who is guilty of this crime, and who can remedy it? On top of that who has the evidence this has taken place that will stand up to cross examination in court where other explanations of how the evidence is viewed will be put forward.
There has been a claim for instance that a big dump of counted ballots happened in the night after the election, and this was fraud. An appearing of a large number of votes, could just be a count of the votes being released after being confirmed and checked, covering a lot of counties and regions etc. It was claimed merely the number of machines in one area was not enough to account for the number so it must be fraud. The answer can be as simple it was from a larger number of regions than the critic knows about. So this is not evidence, ie knowing the number and when it happened does not prove anything other than those votes appeared at that time which is not a crime.
The President and many others have declared this is convincing proof of fraud, but it is just proof of releasing of a number count.
Now if all the evidence falls into this kind of proof, then there is literally no proof just guessing. And if this guessing is then used as a reason for martial law, the US has gone nuts, literally nuts. To put this in context, in Tehran an operator saw a blip on a radar screen, thought is was an enemy plane, launched a missile and killed hundreds of innocent passengers. The should have known at that time the plane was due to take off so was nothing more than a passenger plane, but the evidence was it was a plane that should not have been there so it was killed. Interpretation of evidence or a situation does not define it is correct, because it could be or it could be something else.
What is clearly being driven here is conspiracy theories, antagonism and hatred of others. To accept things could be different is so impossible, it must be evil and corrupt, because anything else is not acceptable. But that is how dictatorships work and brain washing, not democracies and justice. God bless you
