Thanks to all who voted so far in the poll!
If you have not yet voted in the poll, please vote now! :)
If you have not yet voted in the poll, please vote now! :)
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
What you said a while ago is right; it's mainstream; both genders now have it done with confidence. (Which brings a lot of potential and opportunities for faith based designs.)as to girls getting "inked".. I think it's already mainstream.
...I remember when they used to try to "hide" them because it was just starting to switch from male to female.
LOL, that's a personal choice. Personally I'd rather wear a T-Shirt with a message as tats are too permanent. It would be nice though if Christians weren't so allergic to the fine Arts.PS: No I'm not, but it seems compelling to acknowledge the witness potential of faith based tattoos, as do a lot of Christian young people.
Do you think it would be good if more Christian young men and women were prepared to make careers of being tattoo artists, for all the potential there?
Why are you so interested in this?What you said a while ago is right; it's mainstream; both genders now have it done with confidence. (Which brings a lot of potential and opportunities for faith based designs.)
So widespread and so much faith design witness potential.Why are you so interested in this?
Thanks for your comment!LOL, that's a personal choice. Personally I'd rather wear a T-Shirt with a message as tats are too permanent. It would be nice though if Christians weren't so allergic to the fine Arts.
Agreed.Thanks for your comment!
Some Christian young people have a lot of artistic potential; if more of them spent time looking at parlor portfolios, then maybe more of them might become interested in the potentials of work and witness opportunities in the field of tattoo art.
(I hope I'm not somehow being naive here...)
Well, often parents seem to give 18 year olds iphones of one sort or another. (They also seem to expect that their 18 year olds to get tattoos, it would appear...)Agreed.
If we could just tear them away from their iphones.
Agreed.Well, often parents seem to give 18 year olds iphones of one sort or another. (They also seem to expect that their 18 year olds to get tattoos, it would appear...)
Part of it is probably that parents want their teens to be safe and so have reckoned that a cellphone - with bells and whistles - enables them to call for help.Agreed.
Times sure have changed.
Remember when SOME PARENTS were still holding out -- refusing to get their child one of these new phones? Seems like yesterday. Now the parents buy them as a gift. How the world has changed....
I agree with the first paragraph.Part of it is probably that parents want their teens to be safe and so have reckoned that a cellphone - with bells and whistles - enables them to call for help.
Seems also that when 18 year olds go for their first ink, it's not unusual for a parent to go along with them to the parlor to give moral support. (It's not something that the 18 year olds necessarily do surreptitiously; they do it confidently and openly, often with parental support now.)
Oh I agree...what I was observing was that while years ago young ppl seemed to get tattoos surreptitiously, now the parents seem to be on board with it...I agree with the first paragraph.
How about this for the 2nd?:
If a parent needs to go hold some kids' hand....
don't you think that kid is too young for ink?
Oh agreed.Oh I agree...what I was observing was that while years ago young ppl seemed to get tattoos surreptitiously, now the parents seem to be on board with it...
In the scheme of things, for young ppl, an extra piercing or a bit of ink are not too different, are they?Oh agreed.
My friends daughter,,,way back when...
had her upper ear pierced for an earring.
It was in style back then.
She made her hair grow first so her father wouldn't notice!
This worked for a couple of years and then she was about 18/19 and she just told him.
Could you imagine?
Wait a minute.In the scheme of things, for young ppl, an extra piercing or a bit of ink are not too different, are they?
It's so widespread now.
Oh I agree. But in the scheme of things, an extra stud in an ear or a cross or Christian fish sign <>< on a wrist, etc., are hardly things to "moralize" against, are they?Wait a minute.
But because something is widespread,,,does that make it be good?
No.Oh I agree. But in the scheme of things, an extra stud in an ear or a cross or Christian fish sign <>< on a wrist, etc., are hardly things to "moralize" against, are they?
It used to be that sailors and bikers got tattooed, and nearly always men.I don't believe there is anything immoral about getting ink, as you put it.
There are probably quite a few Christian young ppl with real skills in art who would probably make good tattoo artists if they were open to pursing it.It would be nice though if Christians weren't so allergic to the fine Arts.