BreadOfLife
Well-Known Member
- Jan 2, 2017
- 21,657
- 3,591
- 113
- Faith
- Christian
- Country
- United States
This is an asinine statement to make.Keeping it outside of Canon, is the same as relegating its authority, Mary. In other words, it doesn't have credibility, not at the inspired level. Not to mention how far removed from the actual events that it is, as far as when it was written is concerned.
You need to try and keep things real, Mary. Going off into mysticism, and exalting conduits to Christ over and above their allotted measure, is foolhardy, and ultimately blasphemous.
Do you believe that the Revolutionary War was faught in the 18th ventury? Do you have any witnesses - or do you simply rely on NON-Scriptural sources to inform you about it?
Just because somnething wasn't considered to be God-inspoired and included in the Body of Scripture DOESN'T mean it isn't true.
The Letter of Clement gives us an inside look at the 1st century Church. It was read from pulpits and considered to be Scripture for almost 300 years until the Holy Spirit, speaking through His Catholic Church declared that it wasn't God-inspired Scripture. Does this "nullify" the Letter of Clement as a fairy tale?
Your arguments are childish and stupid . . .