Michael the Archangel

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Berean

Active Member
Feb 29, 2024
179
110
43
Midwest
www.food4jws.com
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
This subject has been much misunderstood by many, especially because of some prevalent erroneous teachings in the nominal church. Because of the trinity doctrine and other errors, many do not identify Michael and archangel with the Word, or Logos, the pre-human Jesus. We will examine evidence from the Scriptures, reason and facts, showing that they are the same grand and mighty person.

The term archangel is compounded from the Greek words arche, meaning chief, or first, and aggelos (pronounced angelos) meaning messenger. Thus the word archangel means chief messenger. It occurs but twice in the Bible (Jude 9; 1 Thess. 4:16), and both times it is properly not plural, but singular, for the derivation of the word shows that there can be only one chief, or first, angel, i.e., the Archangel, the Chief Messenger.

Billy Graham suggests impossibility when in his book Angels, (pg. 59) he says, and "Along with Michael he [Lucifer] may have been one of the two archangels."

In Jude 9 the Archangel is identified as Michael; and Michael is mentioned also in Dan. 10:13,21; 12:1; Rev. 12:7.

As we study the matter in the light of the Scriptures, it becomes very evident that Michael the Archangel was none other than God’s Chief Messenger - our Lord Jesus in His pre-human existence, the mighty Word, or Logos, through whom the Father brought into existence all other creatures and things (John 1:1-3; Col. 1:15-17).

This mighty One, "though being in God's form, yet did not mediate a usurpation to be like God, but divested himself, taking a bondsman's form, having been made in the likeness of men; and being in condition as a man, he humbled himself, becoming obedient unto death, even the death of the cross" (Phil. 2:6-8 - Diaglott). And God as a consequence raised Him from the dead, highly exalted Him and gave Him "a name which is above every name; that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow ... and that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father" (vs. 10,11).

Jesus is called "the messenger of the covenant, whom ye delight in" (Mal. 3:1). The Hebrew word maloch, translated messenger here, is the word corresponding to the Greek word aggelos, and is usually translated angel. And, among other things from the Scriptures (e.g., Prov. 8:22-30; John 1:1-3; 3:13; 8:14,23,42-58; 10:36; 16:28; 17:5; 2 Cor. 8:9) teach concerning Jesus' pre-human glory, we conclude that He was indeed the Archangel, the Chief Messenger.

Jesus is called "the messenger of the covenant, whom ye delight in" (Mal. 3:1). The Hebrew word Maloch, translated messenger here, is the word corresponding to the Greek word aggelos, and is usually translated angel. And, among other things, from what the Scriptures (e.g. Prov. 8:22,30; John 1:1-3; 3:13; 8:14,23,42-58; 10:36; 16:28; 17:5; 2 Cor. 8:9) teach concerning Jesus' pre-human glory, we conclude that He was indeed the Archangel, the Chief Messenger.

Surely God's firstborn (Psa. 89:27), "the first born of every creature" (Col. 1:15), "the beginning of the creation of God" (Rev. 3:14), would under him be the chief One, the Archangel, the Chief Messenger. And He is "the only begotten of the Father" (John 1:14) "his only begotten Son" (3:16) - the only being whom God directly created (Jesus' creation was a figurative begettal); and in this sense He is the Alpha and Omega (Rev. 21:6; 22:13) the beginning and ending, the first and the last, of God's direct creation, "who was before all things, and by whom [as God's agent] all things consist" (Col. 1:16,17). "Without him was not any thing made that was made" (John 1:1-3).

In Phil. 2:6, the apostle Paul contrasts the course of the pre-existent Jesus with that of Lucifer, who became Satan - the rebel-angel - the chief of "the angels [messengers] which kept not their own estate" (Jude 6; 2 Pet. 2:4). Isa. 14:12-15 shows how Lucifer (Satan) did mediate a usurpation of God's honor and power, saying in his heart, "I will ascend into the heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God ... I will be like the most High."

In His pre-human condition, Jesus, the firstborn of God, the Archangel, or Chief Messenger, outranked Lucifer (Satan), whose rebellion must have been directed against His authority, as well as that of God. Thus Paul's language implies that exaltation, which Lucifer (Satan) sought by pride and rebellion, but failed to reach, was obtained by Jesus, the Chief Messenger, who humbles Himself and consequently was exalted to the divine nature.

One Scripture which may seem to some to conflict with Jesus being Michael the Archangel is Heb. 1:13; "But to which of the angels said he [God] at any time, Sit on my right hand, until I make thine enemies thy footstool?" Unto none of the subordinate angels was this highest honor given, but to Him who was superior to and chief over all the subordinate angels, or messengers, "the first begotten" of the Father (vs. 5,6), (mal. 3:1). Tus seen, Heb. 1:13 not only does not oppose but supports the teachings that Jesus and Michael are the same person.
 

Berean

Active Member
Feb 29, 2024
179
110
43
Midwest
www.food4jws.com
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
DANIEL 10:13-21 EXAMINED

Some think that Dan. 10:13 proves that there are several archangels, including Gabriel. However, it is significant that while Gabriel is mentioned in the Bible as an angel, he is never mentioned as an archangel. He was highly honored by God, being given the privilege of announcing the conception of Jesus in Mary's womb (Luke 1:19,26).

It is noteworthy that Gabriel was given this high privilege and not Michael, a fact which can scarcely be accounted for otherwise than because Michael, the Archangel, the Chief Messenger, was in the process of carnation, of becoming the babe of Bethlehem. Gabriel may have been the chief angel (messenger) remaining in God's courts of glory after the prehuman Jesus, Michael the archangel, was sent on that most marked and notable mission.

In Dan. 8:16; 9:21 we are told that Gabriel was sent to Daniel to make him understand the great vision he had seen. In Dan. 10:12,13 he was informed that even though there had been a delay in answering his prayers for enlightenment, they had been heard. Daniel was told: "The prince of the kingdom of Persia withstood me one and twenty days: but lo Michael, one [the first, see margin] of the chief princes came to help me; and I remained there with the kings of Persia." Michael, the Chief Angel, or Archangel came to the assistance of Gabriel, the less mighty angel. With the translation as given in the margin, this verse does not teach a plurality of archangels, as some claim (an apocryphal book, erroneously mentions seven archangels!), but plainly shows that Michael is the chief, or first one, the archangel, among others who are subordinate angels. But not archangels. These subordinates seemingly are of seven orders and natures - cherubim, seraphim, principalities, thrones, dominions, powers (might) and angels (Gen. 3:24; Isa. 6:2,6; Rom. 8:38; Eph. 1:21; 3:10; Col. 1:1).
 

Berean

Active Member
Feb 29, 2024
179
110
43
Midwest
www.food4jws.com
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
"AT THAT TIME SHALL MICHAEL STANE UP"

Michael is mentioned also in the prophecy of Dan. 21:1, which describes the Day of the Lord - from 1874 onward, the very time in which we live - and its events, including Messiah's standing up, the great time of trouble (which began in 1914), the resurrection of the dead and the deliverance and rewarding of God's people. It could have said, Then shall Messiah set up His Kingdom, etc., but it says this in other words, "At that time shall Michael stand up [assume control and begin to exercise His great power,] the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people; and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation."

Jesus refers to this same occasion in His great prophecy (Matt. 24:21,22) and thus further identifies Himself with Michael as the one who assumes control at the beginning of the great Time of Trouble. This is shown also in Rev. 19:11-21, where in a similar connection He is identified as "The Word of God," the "KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS," who comes forth as God's great general, who leads the armies in heaven in the overthrow of the present order. [Isa. 2:19, 21]

In Dan. 12:1 Michael is called "the great prince." In the 70 weeks' prophecy (Dan. 9:25) Jesus likewise is called "Messiah the Prince," and the Apostle Peter (Acts 3:15; comp. 5:31) calls Him "the prince of life."

Thus Dan. 12:1 clearly identifies Michael with our Lord Jesus, God's Chief Agent, or Messenger, the Lord of Glory, whose Second Presence began in 1874, which we have been proclaiming.
 

Berean

Active Member
Feb 29, 2024
179
110
43
Midwest
www.food4jws.com
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
THE MEANING OF THE NAME MICHAEL

Another important consideration is the meaning of the name Michael - Who as God, or Who is like God? Who is like God but Him whom God has highly exalted and has given Him a name above every name, who is a partaker of the Divine nature, "the express image of his [the Father's] person," of whom it is written also that "all men should honor the Son, even as they honor the Father" (John 5:23; Heb. 1:3; 1 Pet. 1:4)?

Who is like God applies best to the One whom God has highly exalted, to the one who has "life in Himself," (John 5:26). The express image of the Father's person," of whom it is written, "Let all the angels of God worship him."

With the meaning of the name Michael in mind, how significantly it fits Dan. 12:1: "At that time shall Michael [He who is like God - the Great prince] stand up" - come into power and assume control. Yes, God through Him has taken His great power and will begin the Thousand-year reign (Rev. 11:17, 18)

The Apostle Paul's mention of the Archangel (1 Thess. 4:16) is in harmony with the above: "The Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout [keleusma, - a shout of encouragement], with the voice [authority and command] of the archangel, and with the trump of God; and the dead in Christ shall rise first."

Yes, on the basis of the evidence from Scripture, reason and facts, we believe that since the fall of 1874 the great archangel, the Chief messenger, the Messenger of the Covenant, has been present in his Second Advent, that He has stood up - assumed control - and that He has been organizing His Kingdom; therefore there is much unrest among earth's governments, which are tottering to their fall. The voice (of command) from the Chief Messenger is now distinctly heard by those who have hearing ears., and therefore they recognize the dissolution of present systems is in process (2 Pet. 3:7-13). "He uttered his voice, the earth melted" (Psa. 46:6).
 

Berean

Active Member
Feb 29, 2024
179
110
43
Midwest
www.food4jws.com
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
JUDE 9 AND REV. 12:7 EXAMINED

Two other New Testament passages treat of the archangel. Jude 9 reads, "Yet Michael the archangel, in contending with the devil, when he disputed about the body of Moses, dared not bring against him a reviling accusation, but said, "The Lord rebuke you!"

Of Moses it is written (Duet. 34:6) "but no one knows his grave to this day." An important reason for hiding the grave was probably to hinder the Israelites from carrying his corpse as a mummy, which might have become a temptation to idolatry. But God through Michael the Archangel prevented any such eventuality, by effectually contending with the Devil. More than any other creature, Jesus, the Mighty Logos, the Archangel Michael, the Chief Messenger, is able to overcome Satan (Phil 4:13; 1 John 4:4). Thus Jude 9 clearly harmonizes with Michael

The Archangel being identified with the prehuman Jesus.

In Rev. 12:7-9, we read of a war in heaven: " Michael and his angels fought with the dragon; and the dragon and his angels fought, but they did not prevail, nor was a place found for them in heaven any longer. [earliest text read Him]. So the great dragon was cast out"

As the context shows, Michael here is not Christ, but the counterfeit Christ, - the antichrist. The dragon here, as elsewhere, represents the civil power - Pagan Rome - which the papacy fought and gradually overcame, so that the title of Pontifex Maximus, formerly held by the Roman emperors, thereafter applied to the popes (2 Thess. 2:7). The counterfeit Michael (Who is Like God?) was manifest, "so that he as God" sat in "the temple of God [the Church] showing himself that he is God" (2 Thess. 2:4).

Thus our examination of all the pertinent Scriptures, in the light of reason and facts, shows clearly that Michael the archangel, God's Chief Messenger, was indeed the prehuman Jesus, the might Word, or Logos.
 

Berean

Active Member
Feb 29, 2024
179
110
43
Midwest
www.food4jws.com
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Some Commentaries on 'Michael'

Geneva Study Bible: "Even though God could by one angel destroy all the world, yet to assure his children of his love he sends forth double power, even Michael, that is, Christ Jesus the head of angels. "

Matthew Henry Complete Commentary of the Whole Bible: "Here is Michael our prince, the great protector of the church, and the patron of its just but injured cause: The first of the chief princes, ... Christ is the church's prince; angels are not, Heb. 2:5. He presides in the affairs of the church and effectually provides for its good."
 

Davy

Well-Known Member
Feb 11, 2018
12,207
2,601
113
Southeastern U.S.
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
As we study the matter in the light of the Scriptures, it becomes very evident that Michael the Archangel was none other than God’s Chief Messenger - our Lord Jesus in His pre-human existence, the mighty Word, or Logos, through whom the Father brought into existence all other creatures and things (John 1:1-3; Col. 1:15-17).

That is a false teaching, one held by the Jehovah Witness cult which was started by one man, Charles Taz Russel. He wrote a set of Bible studies for his students that he claimed is all one needed, instead of reading The Bible.

The Book of Hebrews flat denies that Jesus Christ was an angel. It instead proclaims Jesus as GOD The Son and the "express image of His Person". NO angels has ever... been that. And The SON was NEVER created, without father, without mother per Hebrews 7.

Why then is the falsehood that Jesus was an angel so DANGEROUS to one's soul and one's salvation?

Simply because ONLY GOD can save us, NO created angel can. Thus the FALSE BELIEF that Jesus was or is, a created angel is to DENY Jesus as Immanuel GOD with us Who died on the cross for the remission of the sins of those who believe on Him as God The Savior.

So if you believe all one needs is an angel, or flesh, to save them, then bye, you won't be in God's future Kingdom with those who believe on Jesus Christ as Immanuel God with us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Monosy

Berean

Active Member
Feb 29, 2024
179
110
43
Midwest
www.food4jws.com
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
That is a false teaching, one held by the Jehovah Witness cult which was started by one man, Charles Taz Russel. He wrote a set of Bible studies for his students that he claimed is all one needed, instead of reading The Bible.
The JWs are not the only ones who believe this, there have been many prominent Protestant ministers (Trinitarians) who also taught this.
 

Davy

Well-Known Member
Feb 11, 2018
12,207
2,601
113
Southeastern U.S.
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Brethren in Christ Jesus,

Here is all the Biblical PROOF you need to show that Jesus of Nazareth is GOD The Savior by His declared Name "Emmanuel" which means "God with us" per the Matthew 1:23 quote from the Book of Isaiah 7:14. Further proof that JESUS IS GOD is given in Isaiah 9:6.

That's all the Bible proof you actually need as a believer on Jesus Christ that GOD came in the flesh as Jesus of Nazareth.

If 'anyone'... argues against that Biblical proof, then you KNOW they are either deceived by Satan's host, or they are trying... to deceive. It's that simple.
 

Monosy

New Member
Jan 20, 2024
16
21
3
London
Faith
Christian
Country
United Kingdom
The book of Daniel says that Michael is one of the chief prince, not *the* chief prince. Which can be verified with the interlinear version.
Jesus is not one of several like him. He is unique. So Michael cannot be Jesus.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Davy

Berean

Active Member
Feb 29, 2024
179
110
43
Midwest
www.food4jws.com
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Brethren in Christ Jesus,

Here is all the Biblical PROOF you need to show that Jesus of Nazareth is GOD The Savior by His declared Name "Emmanuel" which means "God with us" per the Matthew 1:23 quote from the Book of Isaiah 7:14. Further proof that JESUS IS GOD is given in Isaiah 9:6.

That's all the Bible proof you actually need as a believer on Jesus Christ that GOD came in the flesh as Jesus of Nazareth.

If 'anyone'... argues against that Biblical proof, then you KNOW they are either deceived by Satan's host, or they are trying... to deceive. It's that simple.
Isaiah 7:14 reads: “Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.”

Notice, when it came time to give our Lord a name, he wasn't called Immanuel, (“God with us”), but Jesus, (“Savior” - Matt. 1:25). Hence, the name is a title, very much as the "Son of God" or the "Son of Man". If God was sending His only begotten Son to dwell with men, that surely would be a sign that God was with us, lifting up His countenance upon us and being gracious to us. Even today we use the expression, “God be with you.” No more than this need be implied in Isaiah 7:14.

Isaiah 9:6 gives our Savior the title, “The mighty God.” But the Jewish writers were not saying that the Messiah would literally be Jehovah. If judges of Israel were called “gods,” as in Psalm 82:1-7, what would be earthshaking about calling Jesus the “mighty God” (Hebrew, ‘El Gib-bohr’)? Notice, he is not called ‘El Shad-dai,’ a term exclusively applied to Jehovah. Further, “God” in the Isaiah text is the Hebrew EL, defined by Dr. Strong as “strength; as adj[ective] mighty; espec[ially] the Almighty (but used also of any deity).” The fact that the same word (EL) is used in Isa. 57:5 in describing idols shows indeed that it is a general term used to describe any mighty being and, hence, quite appropriately may be applied to our Savior, Jesus, in Isaiah 9:6.

The following sources offer additional comments on Isaiah 9:6 and Psalm 82:1-7: The Catholic Encyclopedia states: “Even these exalted titles did not lead the Jews to recognize that the Saviour to come was to be none other than God Himself.” And theCyclopedia of Biblical, Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature, by McClintock and Strong, says: “Thus it appears that none of the passages cited from the Old Test[ament] in proof of the Trinity are conclusive. . . . We do not find in the Old Test[ament] clear or decided proof upon this subject.”
 

ElieG12

Well-Known Member
Oct 8, 2022
955
283
63
Atlanta
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
That is a false teaching, one held by the Jehovah Witness ...

1) Ernst Wilhelm Hengstenberg, neo-Lutheran, said in his Commentary to Revelation 12 (vv. 7-9) :

“Michael is no one but Christ.”

2) Johann Peter Lange, Calvinist, in his Commentary on Revelation 12:7 wrote:

“We take it that Michael . . . is, from the outset, Christ in warlike array against Satan.”

3) Joseph Benson, a Methodist, back in the early 1800’s in his Commentary to Dan. 10:13,14 stated that:

"Others suppose the contest to be between a good and an evil angel, as in Zechariah 3:1, and Jude, Daniel 10:9, “which latter opinion,” says Wintle, “is perhaps the most just, as there should seem to be no dispute, or contest, between the ministering spirits of heaven, who are always obedient to the pleasure of their Lord. And when the Almighty sent a superior angel, Michael, whose name is sometimes given to Christ himself, Revelation 12:7, his office probably was to assist Gabriel in subduing the prince of the power of the air, the powers of this darksome world, or the spirits that rule over the children of disobedience, Ephesians 2:2." Daniel 10 - Benson's Commentary of the Old and New Testaments - Bible Commentaries - StudyLight.org

... and on Dan. 12:1 states clearly that: “The word Michael signifies, Who is like God? which name, with the title here given him, The great prince which standeth for the children of thy people, manifestly points out the Messiah” Daniel 12 - Benson's Commentary of the Old and New Testaments - Bible Commentaries - StudyLight.org

4) Martin Luther says in his commentary on the book of Daniel (in German) (WABL 11:2:108) that:

"Even if Michel has a name of an angel, we however, still understand him to be Christ himself, just like in Revelations 12; Christ, who came down to earth to us with his angels, who are the preachers (of the Gospel) to fight against the devil through the Gospel, for he calls him a great prince."

You can consult a Lutheran Sermon online that provides more information about Luther's teaching here Sermon for St. Michael and All Angels at Zion Church, Baltimore 10/01/2006 -zion-church-baltimore-10012006/

5) John Calvin, in his personal collaboration to an edition of the famous Geneva Bible, includes a note on Dan. 10:13 which says:

"Even though God could by one angel destroy all the world, yet to assure his children of his love he sends forth double power, even Michael, that is, Christ Jesus the head of angels." geneva bible notes - daniel

And separately, in his Bible Commentary, he says in Dan. 10:13 that:

"Some think the word Michael represents Christ, and I do not object to this opinion. Clearly enough, if all angels keep watch over the faithful and elect, still Christ holds the first rank among them, because he is their head , and uses their ministry and assistance to defend all his people. But as this is not generally admitted, I leave it in doubt for the present, and shall say more on the subject in the twelfth chapter ".

Then when commenting Dan. 12:1 he says:

"By Michael many agree in understanding Christ as the head of the Church. But if it seems better to understand Michael as the archangel, this sense will prove suitable, for under Christ as the head, angels are the guardians of the Church. Whatever be the true meaning, God was the preserver of his Church by the hand of his only-begotten Son, and because the angels are under the government of Christ, he might entrust this duty to Michael." Calvin's Commentaries
 

ElieG12

Well-Known Member
Oct 8, 2022
955
283
63
Atlanta
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
6) The scientist Isaac Newton, well known for his physical laws, some important astronomical and mathematical notes, etc. Many do not know that Newton was an avid student of the Bible and that although he did not usually publish much of the things he discovered, due to the time in which he lived, many of the papers he wrote are preserved today, including those related to his biblical studies. Note these records from Newton about Archangel Michael:

Folio <32>
(...)
If you would therefore know why Iesus is called the Christ, the son of God, the son of man, the Lamb of God, the Word of God, &c you must have recourse to the old Testament, & there you will find that he is called the Christ or Messiah to signify that he is the Messiah who was spoken of in Daniels Prophesy of the 70 weeks. The son of man to signify that he is the person of whom Daniel writes in saying, Behold one like the son of man came with the clouds of heaven: & there was given him dominion & glory & a kingdom that all people nations & languages should serve him: his dominion is an everlasting dominion. The son of God to signify that he is the person spoken of in the second Psalm in these words: The Lord hath said unto me Thou art my son this day have I begotten thee Ask of me & I will give the heathen for thine inheritance & the ends of the earth for thy possession: thou shalt break them with a rod of iron, & thou shalt dash them in pieces like a potters vessel. The Lamb of God to signify that he was prefigured in the Paschal Lamb ordeined by Moses The Word of God.
<33>
He is also called Michael in Apoc 12, & this with reference to the same name in Daniel chap 10 & 12, to signify that he is that Michael the great Prince who in the end of the world shall stand up for the children of Daniels people & who in the days of Daniel helped the Angel Gabriel against the Prince of the kingdom of Persia & who alone held with & assisted the Angel Gabriel in matters of prophesy & is there called the Prince of Daniels people, (...)
'Irenicum, or Ecclesiastical Polyty tending to Peace' (Normalized)

7) Adam Clarke (Irish Methodist theologian), in his biblical Commentary on Dan. 10:13 says:

"Michael, he who is like God, sometimes appears to signify the Messiah, at other times the highest or chief archangel. Indeed there is no archangel mentioned in the whole Scripture but this one." Adam Clarke's Bible Commentary - Daniel 10

8) Albert Barnes (Reformed Presbyterian theologian), doesn't say directly that the Archangel is Jesus, but in his biblical Notes, on Dan. 10:13 he says that:

"Michael, one of the chief princes - Margin, "the first." That is, the first in rank of the "princes," or the angels. In other words, Michael, the archangel." The proper meaning of this name (מיכאל mı̂ykâ'êl) is, "Who as God," and is a name given, undoubtedly, from some resemblance to God. The exact reason why it is given is not anywhere stated; but may it not be this - that one looking on the majesty and glory of the chief of the angels would instinctively ask, "Who, after all, is like God? Even this lofty angel, with all his glory, cannot be compared to the high and lofty One." Whatever may have been the reason of the appellation, however, the name in the Scriptures has a definite application, and is given to the chief one of the angels." Daniel 10 Barnes' Notes

9) Matthew Henry (Reformed Presbyterian), on his Concise Commentary of the Bible, on Dan. 12:1-4 says:

“Michael signifies, "Who is like God," and his name, with the title of "the great Prince," points out the Divine Saviour. Christ stood for the children of our people in their stead as a sacrifice, bore the curse for them, to bear it from them. He stands for them in pleading for them at the throne of grace. And after the destruction of antichrist, the Lord Jesus shall stand at the latter day upon the earth; and He shall appear for the complete redemption of all his people.” Matthew Henry: Matthew Henry's Concise Commentary on the Bible - Christian Classics Ethereal Library

10) John Wesley (British theologian, founder of the Methodist church), on his Explanatory Notes on the Whole Bible, on Dan. 10:13 says:

"Michael here is commonly supposed to mean Christ."

... and in Dan. 12:1 about the expression "For the children" says:

"The meaning seems to be, as after the death of Antiochus the Jews had some deliverance, so there will be yet a greater deliverance to the people of God, when Michael your prince, the Messiah shall appear for your salvation. (...)" http://wesley.nnu.edu/john-wesley/j...-bible/notes-on-the-book-of-daniel/#Chapter+X

11) John Gill (British Reformed Baptist theologian) on his Expositions, says on Dan. 10:13:

" (...) called in the New Testament an Archangel, the Prince of angels, the Head of all principality and power; and is no other than Christ the Son of God, an uncreated Angel; who is "one", or "the first of the chief Princes" x, superior to angels, in nature, name, and office; he came to "help" Gabriel, not as a fellow creature, but as the Lord of hosts; not as a fellow soldier, but as General of the armies in heaven and earth, as superior to him in wisdom and strength; and he helped him by giving him fresh counsels, orders, and instructions, which he following succeeded." Daniel 10 - Gill's Exposition of the Whole Bible - Bible Commentaries - StudyLight.org

12) Charles Spurgeon (Reformed Baptist) :

From “The Blood of the Lamb, The Conquering Weapon” (Sept. 9, 1888):

“By faith we rise into the conquering place this day. In the heavenlies we triumph, as also in every place. We rejoice in our Lord Jesus Christ, the Michael of the angels, the Redeemer of men. For by Him we see Satan cast out and all the powers of evil hurled from their places of power and eminence.”

From “Our Lord’s Transcendent Greatness” (Dec. 2, 1866):

You remember how our Lord, who is the true Michael, the only great Archangel, said at the beginning of the preaching of the Gospel, “I beheld Satan as lightning falling from Heaven.”

From “The Angelic Life” (Nov. 22, 1868):

“We read that Michael and his angels fought against the dragon and his angels, and the dragon was cast down. The fight is going on every day. Michael is the Lord Jesus, the only Archangel.”
 
Last edited:

Davy

Well-Known Member
Feb 11, 2018
12,207
2,601
113
Southeastern U.S.
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
1) Ernst Wilhelm Hengstenberg, neo-Lutheran, said in his Commentary to Revelation 12 (vv. 7-9) :

“Michael is no one but Christ.”

2) Johann Peter Lange, Calvinist, in his Commentary on Revelation 12:7 wrote:

“We take it that Michael . . . is, from the outset, Christ in warlike array against Satan.”

3) Joseph Benson, a Methodist, back in the early 1800’s in his Commentary to Dan. 10:13,14 stated that:

"Others suppose the contest to be between a good and an evil angel, as in Zechariah 3:1, and Jude, Daniel 10:9, “which latter opinion,” says Wintle, “is perhaps the most just, as there should seem to be no dispute, or contest, between the ministering spirits of heaven, who are always obedient to the pleasure of their Lord. And when the Almighty sent a superior angel, Michael, whose name is sometimes given to Christ himself, Revelation 12:7, his office probably was to assist Gabriel in subduing the prince of the power of the air, the powers of this darksome world, or the spirits that rule over the children of disobedience, Ephesians 2:2." Daniel 10 - Benson's Commentary of the Old and New Testaments - Bible Commentaries - StudyLight.org

... and on Dan. 12:1 states clearly that: “The word Michael signifies, Who is like God? which name, with the title here given him, The great prince which standeth for the children of thy people, manifestly points out the Messiah” Daniel 12 - Benson's Commentary of the Old and New Testaments - Bible Commentaries - StudyLight.org

4) Martin Luther says in his commentary on the book of Daniel (in German) (WABL 11:2:108) that:

"Even if Michel has a name of an angel, we however, still understand him to be Christ himself, just like in Revelations 12; Christ, who came down to earth to us with his angels, who are the preachers (of the Gospel) to fight against the devil through the Gospel, for he calls him a great prince."

You can consult a Lutheran Sermon online that provides more information about Luther's teaching here Sermon for St. Michael and All Angels at Zion Church, Baltimore 10/01/2006 -zion-church-baltimore-10012006/

5) John Calvin, in his personal collaboration to an edition of the famous Geneva Bible, includes a note on Dan. 10:13 which says:

"Even though God could by one angel destroy all the world, yet to assure his children of his love he sends forth double power, even Michael, that is, Christ Jesus the head of angels." geneva bible notes - daniel

And separately, in his Bible Commentary, he says in Dan. 10:13 that:

"Some think the word Michael represents Christ, and I do not object to this opinion. Clearly enough, if all angels keep watch over the faithful and elect, still Christ holds the first rank among them, because he is their head , and uses their ministry and assistance to defend all his people. But as this is not generally admitted, I leave it in doubt for the present, and shall say more on the subject in the twelfth chapter ".

Then when commenting Dan. 12:1 he says:

"By Michael many agree in understanding Christ as the head of the Church. But if it seems better to understand Michael as the archangel, this sense will prove suitable, for under Christ as the head, angels are the guardians of the Church. Whatever be the true meaning, God was the preserver of his Church by the hand of his only-begotten Son, and because the angels are under the government of Christ, he might entrust this duty to Michael." Calvin's Commentaries

Falsely being Jesus is Archangel Michael is a FRINGE DOCTRINE FROM MEN, and not from Gods written Word. Nowhere in God's Word is Jesus said to be Michael.
 

ElieG12

Well-Known Member
Oct 8, 2022
955
283
63
Atlanta
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I don't see any doctrine of men on saying that Jesus is the Archangel. All who say it support their understanding with the Scriptures. The Scriptures say the same things about Michael in Daniel times and about Jesus after the first century:

Both Leaders of the angels; both of them are enemies of the Devil and have had direct battles against him. Both of them are the Spiritual Protectors of the people of God: Daniel's people and Christians. Both of them are related with the great tribulation, with the resurrection and with the final battle on favor of the people of God (Dan. 12:1; Rev. 12:7).

A different thing is that you don't like or approve what others understand. But who cares what you approve or like? Not me, sorry. Try to use the Bible when talking about Biblical issues and maybe someone will take you seriously.
 

Davy

Well-Known Member
Feb 11, 2018
12,207
2,601
113
Southeastern U.S.
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I don't see any doctrine of men on saying that Jesus is the Archangel. All who say it support their understanding with the Scriptures. The Scriptures say the same things about Michael in Daniel times and about Jesus after the first century:

Both Leaders of the angels; both of them are enemies of the Devil and have had direct battles against him. Both of them are the Spiritual Protectors of the people of God: Daniel's people and Christians. Both of them are related with the great tribulation, with the resurrection and with the final battle on favor of the people of God (Dan. 12:1; Rev. 12:7).

A different thing is that you don't like or approve what others understand. But who cares what you approve or like? Not me, sorry. Try to use the Bible when talking about Biblical issues and maybe someone will take you seriously.

Silly arguments in favor of the deceived that want to believe that "Emmanuel" was just an angel, and NOT GOD The Son are simply heeding false doctrine pushed by the "synagogue of Satan". It's not difficult to grasp who is really behind that false doctrine, because...

If one believes Jesus Christ is an angel, and not GOD come in the flesh as Jesus Christ, then it means they believe God's Salvation through the Blood of His Son Jesus Christ on the cross is nothing but a HOAX. That because angels CANNOT SAVE, ONLY GOD CAN.

And just WHO is it that REJECTS that Jesus Christ is GOD come in the flesh to die on the cross? The UNBELIEVING JEWS OF THE SYNAGOGUE OF SATAN.
 

Monosy

New Member
Jan 20, 2024
16
21
3
London
Faith
Christian
Country
United Kingdom
I don't see any doctrine of men on saying that Jesus is the Archangel. All who say it support their understanding with the Scriptures. The Scriptures say the same things about Michael in Daniel times and about Jesus after the first century:

Both Leaders of the angels; both of them are enemies of the Devil and have had direct battles against him. Both of them are the Spiritual Protectors of the people of God: Daniel's people and Christians. Both of them are related with the great tribulation, with the resurrection and with the final battle on favor of the people of God (Dan. 12:1; Rev. 12:7).

A different thing is that you don't like or approve what others understand. But who cares what you approve or like? Not me, sorry. Try to use the Bible when talking about Biblical issues and maybe someone will take you seriously.
In all that you quoted you forgot the one passage in the NT that talks about Michael.
Jude 1:9 : "Yet Michael the archangel, in contending with the devil, when he disputed about the body of Moses, dared not bring against him a reviling accusation, but said, “The Lord rebuke you!”
That sentence indicate that Michael is not "The Lord" but that "The Lord" is someone with higher authority than Michael.
When we see Jesus talking about Satan he has no problem calling the devil a murderer, a thief and a liar. He does not refer to anyone higher for those judgement. That is a completely different posture than what is said in Job.

Also you keep posting opinions of men but just because people think something doesn't mean it's true. What matters is what scriptures actually say, not what people invent around it.

The Doctrine that Michael is Jesus is particularly Satanic because its goal is to pull down Jesus on the same level of power as Satan (and to pull up Satan on the same level as God).

They want to make Satan look like he is on par with Jesus. In Daniel the 10-11 the angel says that he is going back to help Michael fight against the prince of Persia. If Michael is an angel we have angels fighting angels. They are probably more or less of similar power so it's understandable that there could be some resistance.
But if we say that Michael is Jesus then suddenly, somehow the Prince of Persia is so powerful that it's not enough for Jesus/God to show up. No, now God needs angels to help him beat the Prince of Persia. He is not powerful enough to do it on his own.

Satan is NOT the counterpart of God, as much as he would like to be exalted to this position...
 
Last edited:

Ronald Nolette

Well-Known Member
Aug 24, 2020
13,146
3,874
113
69
South Carolina
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
This subject has been much misunderstood by many, especially because of some prevalent erroneous teachings in the nominal church. Because of the trinity doctrine and other errors, many do not identify Michael and archangel with the Word, or Logos, the pre-human Jesus. We will examine evidence from the Scriptures, reason and facts, showing that they are the same grand and mighty person.

The term archangel is compounded from the Greek words arche, meaning chief, or first, and aggelos (pronounced angelos) meaning messenger. Thus the word archangel means chief messenger. It occurs but twice in the Bible (Jude 9; 1 Thess. 4:16), and both times it is properly not plural, but singular, for the derivation of the word shows that there can be only one chief, or first, angel, i.e., the Archangel, the Chief Messenger.

Billy Graham suggests impossibility when in his book Angels, (pg. 59) he says, and "Along with Michael he [Lucifer] may have been one of the two archangels."

In Jude 9 the Archangel is identified as Michael; and Michael is mentioned also in Dan. 10:13,21; 12:1; Rev. 12:7.

As we study the matter in the light of the Scriptures, it becomes very evident that Michael the Archangel was none other than God’s Chief Messenger - our Lord Jesus in His pre-human existence, the mighty Word, or Logos, through whom the Father brought into existence all other creatures and things (John 1:1-3; Col. 1:15-17).

This mighty One, "though being in God's form, yet did not mediate a usurpation to be like God, but divested himself, taking a bondsman's form, having been made in the likeness of men; and being in condition as a man, he humbled himself, becoming obedient unto death, even the death of the cross" (Phil. 2:6-8 - Diaglott). And God as a consequence raised Him from the dead, highly exalted Him and gave Him "a name which is above every name; that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow ... and that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father" (vs. 10,11).

Jesus is called "the messenger of the covenant, whom ye delight in" (Mal. 3:1). The Hebrew word maloch, translated messenger here, is the word corresponding to the Greek word aggelos, and is usually translated angel. And, among other things from the Scriptures (e.g., Prov. 8:22-30; John 1:1-3; 3:13; 8:14,23,42-58; 10:36; 16:28; 17:5; 2 Cor. 8:9) teach concerning Jesus' pre-human glory, we conclude that He was indeed the Archangel, the Chief Messenger.

Jesus is called "the messenger of the covenant, whom ye delight in" (Mal. 3:1). The Hebrew word Maloch, translated messenger here, is the word corresponding to the Greek word aggelos, and is usually translated angel. And, among other things, from what the Scriptures (e.g. Prov. 8:22,30; John 1:1-3; 3:13; 8:14,23,42-58; 10:36; 16:28; 17:5; 2 Cor. 8:9) teach concerning Jesus' pre-human glory, we conclude that He was indeed the Archangel, the Chief Messenger.

Surely God's firstborn (Psa. 89:27), "the first born of every creature" (Col. 1:15), "the beginning of the creation of God" (Rev. 3:14), would under him be the chief One, the Archangel, the Chief Messenger. And He is "the only begotten of the Father" (John 1:14) "his only begotten Son" (3:16) - the only being whom God directly created (Jesus' creation was a figurative begettal); and in this sense He is the Alpha and Omega (Rev. 21:6; 22:13) the beginning and ending, the first and the last, of God's direct creation, "who was before all things, and by whom [as God's agent] all things consist" (Col. 1:16,17). "Without him was not any thing made that was made" (John 1:1-3).

In Phil. 2:6, the apostle Paul contrasts the course of the pre-existent Jesus with that of Lucifer, who became Satan - the rebel-angel - the chief of "the angels [messengers] which kept not their own estate" (Jude 6; 2 Pet. 2:4). Isa. 14:12-15 shows how Lucifer (Satan) did mediate a usurpation of God's honor and power, saying in his heart, "I will ascend into the heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God ... I will be like the most High."

In His pre-human condition, Jesus, the firstborn of God, the Archangel, or Chief Messenger, outranked Lucifer (Satan), whose rebellion must have been directed against His authority, as well as that of God. Thus Paul's language implies that exaltation, which Lucifer (Satan) sought by pride and rebellion, but failed to reach, was obtained by Jesus, the Chief Messenger, who humbles Himself and consequently was exalted to the divine nature.

One Scripture which may seem to some to conflict with Jesus being Michael the Archangel is Heb. 1:13; "But to which of the angels said he [God] at any time, Sit on my right hand, until I make thine enemies thy footstool?" Unto none of the subordinate angels was this highest honor given, but to Him who was superior to and chief over all the subordinate angels, or messengers, "the first begotten" of the Father (vs. 5,6), (mal. 3:1). Tus seen, Heb. 1:13 not only does not oppose but supports the teachings that Jesus and Michael are the same person.
Sorry but that watchtower doctrine don't fly as well as all the other Watchtower doctrine you are promulgatin here.

If you knew Scripture you would know that Michael was the arch angel- the chief of the angels. But angels were beneath the Seraphim and teh Seraphim were beneath the Chrubim in rank and order!

Lucifer was the anointed cherub and the highest creation of God. The fourth most powerful being in the universe.

And you do not know how the term firstborn of creation is used biblically. And for REv. 3:14 beginning is the word "arche" which is better translated as "the beginner" or ruler of the creation of God, not the first born.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PS95

Berean

Active Member
Feb 29, 2024
179
110
43
Midwest
www.food4jws.com
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Sorry but that watchtower doctrine don't fly as well as all the other Watchtower doctrine you are promulgating here.
I'm not a JW, and my group was here before theirs, so if anything, they got it from us. LOL
If you knew Scripture you would know that Michael was the archangel- the chief of the angels. But angels were beneath the Seraphim and the Seraphim were beneath the Cherubim in rank and order!
And where in scripture is that found?
Lucifer was the anointed cherub and the highest creation of God. The fourth most powerful being in the universe.
Scripture please.
And you do not know how the term firstborn of creation is used biblically. And for Rev. 3:14 beginning is the word "arche" which is better translated as "the beginner" or ruler of the creation of God, not the firstborn.
Hmmm .... so how does that fit with John 1:1? "In the beginning (arche)?