ScottA
Well-Known Member
That's great!I still think I need a bible for the Holy Spirit to use as a tool or a text book, but I also believe that the Holy Spirit can teach me directly in my spirit without the use of the bible. But also that anything he does teach us in that way will be confirmed in scripture.
A few years ago I was admitted to hospital with no chance to pack what I needed and I had such peace about it that I felt I was in the place God wanted me to be and it was almost like a retreat. I didn't have my bible but spent a lot of time praying for my fellow patients and the medical and nursing staff as well as the cleaners and tea ladies etc.
What I'm taking a long time saying is that whilst I was there I realised that it was more important to spend genuine one-to-one time with God than it was to read the bible every day out of habit. And to some people this daily reading of their bibles is paramount and take precedence over a personal quiet time with God . Of course it is important for us to read our bibles but not just out of habit, if that is what we do we get very little from it.
Yes, there is both...and in the world we do need both. The original post poses the question of at some point in spiritual maturity not needing the written word...and that is a specific consideration. But, yes, here and now we do need and rely on both, and should, both are from God for these times. The discussion seemed to go awry because some are offended with the idea that we have both and should sometime transition out of the old and into the new (out of the world and the flesh and all that goes with it, and into the Spirit and the kingdom). I believe the whole thread was a reaction of tipping the pendulum which created a backlash of misunderstanding - and, wow, what an emotional out burst!
Thanks for the comments!