I agree with you Reggie, indoctrination is not for me either, son...lol...I'm not that much older than you either...the life in Christ you have will keep you right and on course away from the freaks, druggies and ignorant older men..Bless you mate
-
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
- Status
Reggie: you have a decent handle of the Hitler's war and the Zionist-Banker connection. They we behind funding both sides of WWII. They even used or conned many companies in the US and UK and France to supply resources and supplies to Hitler. In the US, many don't know that Bush Sr along with his partner Harriman, of the 1930s supplied steel to Hitler to build his war machine. The Zionists controlled the entire campaign and their puppets, before the war even got started...Judaism is a modern religion,, although many think of it as being ancient, of the Israelites. They have been dearly mislead. The religion of Judaism is new, codifies around 500 AD...these Jews, the modern version of the Pharisees, hijacked the true name Jew/Judahite of the time of Christ and before him...
We are being lead astray in the West, the Christian Churches have been under attack from the 60's full on and this was created planed after WW2 when the RCC became Vatican II. That divided the RCC big time and from their on the RCC took on the worldly works trip and bastardised the Priest hood more so, with wimpy poofter Priest dribbling more nonsense and fitting in with this worlds expectations and driving out real Priest who looked to Jesus Christ.
I am of the opinion that when Pope Pious 11th died their was a evil mob at foot within the RCC who were aiding the Nazis and Communist and trying to kill the real Jews who would not support the so called Zionist who were clearly in bed with Hitler's Nazi game plan.
What is interesting was as to when that Pope died and as to he was to sign the next day, maybe he was not in on the plan and had to be killed.
Look at the filth that the RCC and not to mention other Churches have been getting away with, Child molesting for years hidden from the public in such a way like that ! their has to be so many Satanist in charge of many positions of Government, top of Police and Schools all have been working to support such Devils.
I am of the opinion that when Pope Pious 11th died their was a evil mob at foot within the RCC who were aiding the Nazis and Communist and trying to kill the real Jews who would not support the so called Zionist who were clearly in bed with Hitler's Nazi game plan.
What is interesting was as to when that Pope died and as to he was to sign the next day, maybe he was not in on the plan and had to be killed.
Look at the filth that the RCC and not to mention other Churches have been getting away with, Child molesting for years hidden from the public in such a way like that ! their has to be so many Satanist in charge of many positions of Government, top of Police and Schools all have been working to support such Devils.
Corruption, sexual deviancy and evil works even of Satanism has always surrounded religions, and the RCC is no exception. I actually do believe in the Protocols of the Elders. I have a copy if you wish, supplied as a new post. This plan of a Zionist conquest of this world and its peoples is still on course and using religions to do their bidding it one of their methods, and to get them in thick with evil acts of blackmail as I've already pointed out. There are many politicians that have also been useful idiots for their cause..and their main objective is to kill off or eradicate true Christianity from the face of the earth so they can then control the planet under their own Satanic rule.
I agree with you in all that.
I have always looked into what went on in WW2 from when I was 6yo I would say because many old people talked about the War after the party's finished and I picked up on what they said because I took it very seriously, I do not know of anyone who takes WW2 as serious as myself.
And their was an old Jew who had the numbers on his arm and what he said in front of everyone had a different slant on the subject at times, he blamed W Churchill for starting the war and getting all them true Jews killed and himself and his wife having to work in the camps and I remember them being real nice people both had numbers on their left arm done to perfection, no the self tattooed rubbish you see, like school kids I have seen do.
I was 9yo when we left the big city so I did not have them people around to listen to anymore.
I admire the German people in how they turned the Nation around from being a hellhole with 200% inflation and all that, it's truly amazing what they achieved before the war, I am not one sided or prejudice about the whole subject, such people who only look at anything from one side are ignorant fools.
My mum is Danish and she always had hatred for the Germans, so much for that your parents teach you to be prejudice, I can understand were she was coming from and I understand the Jews who have the same point of views, next door back in the days was a Danish Jew and she got a present that would of cost a lot given to here and she looked as to where it was made, it was made in Germany she said and handed it back saying Nay ! it's made in Germany. her son was one of my best mates till he died and he was a lefty and we would argue till the cows came home and she was sort of like another mum to me as we got on well, but she would say of her son that he was a crazy kid all of the time.
I do not like war or reading war story's at all, nor does such inspire me at all, but I only look into the points regarding as to why such and such took place. so when at school what they were dishing up was really not in my books as interesting at all, I did not care about the battles like most only love all that crap, it was the intentions that I were interested in to as only as to why. but that is like pulling teeth to get such information out of history. I am like Lt Columbo just sniffing about looking to tie up any loose ends.
Yes I have read that, looks like it's he plan to me. I do not believe in many things and was sceptical of that at first, but boy it's all coming true bit by bit. very creepy indeed !
I do not believe in many such things like such, predictions etc because they can be made up to fit anything in to do with the packaging.
Thinking back to when I first seen such as you pointed out I was angered that someone would print such totally stupid rubbish, I did not believe that anyone could be so deranged, but now sadly nothing would surprise me.
oh boy I have seen the works of evil in people that just astounded me. Such has given me such a despise for the works of Sin. so when some one comes and talks who is under the power of such I read it, now they can be nice people but they are bathing in it, that you can not pull them out of such a position as they are not on the same page one could say.If one has pride in doing wrong to your fellow man
but I see it everywhere. Vampires !I seen a show back in the 1980's called Monkey Magic and my wife bought me the whole set and it has interesting truths within the story's that are worthy of thought, if you watch a show like such their is indeed a message to be learned, I like such story's and it proves that one is awake or has the ability to understand and reasoning powers. most people just bag it because it's Chines, so they will not bother to watch it. but it's bloody funny and entertaining and has a message. any others who try and create the story's that I have seen are totally hopeless rubbish disgraceful and stupid beyond a joke. only the original is worthy.
Australian Covid-19 vaccine trials ended after test subjects return 'false positive' HIV results
Well scrap one vaccine!
Well scrap one vaccine!
Nobel Laureate, PCR Inventor Said Fauci Was a Liar, Abusing Test Data For An Agenda And Afraid To Debate
by RoundTableReport.com
The Nobel Laureate inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, died at the age of 74 back in August of 2019 but prior to his death, he had a lot of interaction with Fauci.
He’d already gone to war with Fauci for misusing his PCR test. Mullis and other scientists said Fauci was magnifying the retrovirus HIV using PCR to “prove” it was the cause of AIDS. Mullis was furious that Fauci refused to debate him on science but argued from authority.
Does this all sound familiar? It’s another reason why this COVID “novel” was not credible from the beginning. In the past, Fauci, CDC, etc, had abused test methods many times to push pandemics and pharmaceuticals.
“The strategy for locking us down again is based on these fraudulent tests. The magnified tests that don’t measure the quantity of anything. It’s the same strategy Fauci used to make a lot of money for a lot of people. It’s not just the PCR test, all these rapid tests, every one of them, they’re all NON-QUANTITATIVE tests. There’s no such thing as a non-quantitative test, it’s a lie, an obvious fraud. We’re locking everybody down over brainless lies. The only reason they were able to get away with this is because they’ve turned us into an idiocracy, that was the whole point of the government schools.”
“[Mullis] always said you couldn’t use [PCR] to diagnose a disease but in this particular clip, he goes directly after Fauci and tells what a liar he is,” reported David Knight on 12/10/2020’s show.
Knight then played the clip where Mullis said, “These guys like Fauci get up there and start talking to me, you know, he doesn’t know anything really about anything, and I’d say that to his face. Nothing. The man thinks you can take a blood sample and stick it in an electron microscope and if it’s got a virus in there you’d know it. He doesn’t understand electron microscopy, and he doesn’t understand medicine, and he shouldn’t be in the position he’s in. Most of those guys up there on the top are just total administrative people, and they don’t know anything about what’s going on at the bottom. Those guys have an agenda, which is not what we would like them to have, being that we pay for them to take care of our health in some way. They’ve got a personal kind of agenda, they make up their own rules, they change them as they go. And Tony Fauci doesn’t mind going on television in front of the people who pay his salary and lie directly into the camera.”
https://twitter.com/i/status/1336923426259349504
Knight comments, “Fauci didn’t want to have the debate because he only argues from AUTHORITY. Mullis didn’t believe that there was a connection between HIV and AIDS and said they’re making this connection by misusing his test. He said we all have retroviruses and they’re, literally, blowing this way out of proportion. They’re amplifying it a TRILLION times, that’s what a PCR cycle of 40 does.” The FDA requires PCR testing of COVID to be 40 CT (cycle threshold).
There’s an excellent article about Mullis and his conflict with Fauci by Celia
by RoundTableReport.com
The Nobel Laureate inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, died at the age of 74 back in August of 2019 but prior to his death, he had a lot of interaction with Fauci.
He’d already gone to war with Fauci for misusing his PCR test. Mullis and other scientists said Fauci was magnifying the retrovirus HIV using PCR to “prove” it was the cause of AIDS. Mullis was furious that Fauci refused to debate him on science but argued from authority.
Does this all sound familiar? It’s another reason why this COVID “novel” was not credible from the beginning. In the past, Fauci, CDC, etc, had abused test methods many times to push pandemics and pharmaceuticals.
“The strategy for locking us down again is based on these fraudulent tests. The magnified tests that don’t measure the quantity of anything. It’s the same strategy Fauci used to make a lot of money for a lot of people. It’s not just the PCR test, all these rapid tests, every one of them, they’re all NON-QUANTITATIVE tests. There’s no such thing as a non-quantitative test, it’s a lie, an obvious fraud. We’re locking everybody down over brainless lies. The only reason they were able to get away with this is because they’ve turned us into an idiocracy, that was the whole point of the government schools.”
“[Mullis] always said you couldn’t use [PCR] to diagnose a disease but in this particular clip, he goes directly after Fauci and tells what a liar he is,” reported David Knight on 12/10/2020’s show.
Knight then played the clip where Mullis said, “These guys like Fauci get up there and start talking to me, you know, he doesn’t know anything really about anything, and I’d say that to his face. Nothing. The man thinks you can take a blood sample and stick it in an electron microscope and if it’s got a virus in there you’d know it. He doesn’t understand electron microscopy, and he doesn’t understand medicine, and he shouldn’t be in the position he’s in. Most of those guys up there on the top are just total administrative people, and they don’t know anything about what’s going on at the bottom. Those guys have an agenda, which is not what we would like them to have, being that we pay for them to take care of our health in some way. They’ve got a personal kind of agenda, they make up their own rules, they change them as they go. And Tony Fauci doesn’t mind going on television in front of the people who pay his salary and lie directly into the camera.”
https://twitter.com/i/status/1336923426259349504
Knight comments, “Fauci didn’t want to have the debate because he only argues from AUTHORITY. Mullis didn’t believe that there was a connection between HIV and AIDS and said they’re making this connection by misusing his test. He said we all have retroviruses and they’re, literally, blowing this way out of proportion. They’re amplifying it a TRILLION times, that’s what a PCR cycle of 40 does.” The FDA requires PCR testing of COVID to be 40 CT (cycle threshold).
There’s an excellent article about Mullis and his conflict with Fauci by Celia
Last edited:
The Latest: Study: 2-drug treatment helpful for coronavirus
Results from a study done in Memphis...
They got a treatment!.
Results from a study done in Memphis...
They got a treatment!.
Watch: Austrian MP Tests Cola for Covid-19 – Yields Positive Result
by Adan Salazar
An Austrian parliamentary member demonstrated the defectiveness of the government’s Covid-19 tests by showing how a glass of coke yields a positive result.
In footage from the meeting in Vienna Friday, FPO General Secretary Michael Schnedlitz brings a glass of cola to the podium, from which he proceeds to collect drops to use on an antigen rapid test being used on a mass scale.
The results of the test are described by independent German news site Reitscchuster.de (translated from German):
After going to the lectern and starting his speech, the politician sprinkled a corona rapid test with a few drops of cola. Three minutes later the test showed a result: It was positive. So Coke triggered such a result.
After demonstrating a positive result, Schnedlitz goes on to slam the tests as a waste of taxpayer resources.
“Mr. President, we are likely to have a problem now, we have a positive corona test in parliament, namely this cola triggered a positive corona test. I don’t know how to deal with it now! With things like this you are throwing tens of millions of euros in tax money out of the window instead of providing real protection for old people’s and nursing homes, instead of investing money in our hospitals.”
According to a report from oe24.at, Schnedlitz proceeded to slam the government’s lockdown, saying:
“A ‘dictatorship light’ was set up by the ÖVP and the Greens and the Austrians Their fundamental rights, such as their civil rights and the right to freedom of expression – specifically, illegal ordinances were issued and the authorities were asked to take action against their own people. ”
Schnedlitz continued his criticism on Facebook, where he called the tests “worthless”:
“Today I did a corona test live in parliament,” reads Schnedlitz’s post, translated from German. “The corona mass tests are worthless! This was also shown by a simple experiment in parliament, in which a cola had a positive result! But this black-green government spends tens of millions in tax money on precisely these tests.”
Michael Schnedlitz: „Minister Anschober, treten Sie und ihre Regierung zurück!“
In German
Following the experiment, another Austrian politician, ÖVP General Axel Melchior, dismissed Schnedlitz’s claims, and accused him of being drunk.
“You, I really do not understand what you are doing. I had the whole time hoped that this was not a Cola, but Bacardi-Cola – that would have justified your behavior a bit,” Melchior said, to which Schnedlitz responded by holding up his can of Coca Cola.
by Adan Salazar
An Austrian parliamentary member demonstrated the defectiveness of the government’s Covid-19 tests by showing how a glass of coke yields a positive result.
In footage from the meeting in Vienna Friday, FPO General Secretary Michael Schnedlitz brings a glass of cola to the podium, from which he proceeds to collect drops to use on an antigen rapid test being used on a mass scale.
The results of the test are described by independent German news site Reitscchuster.de (translated from German):
After going to the lectern and starting his speech, the politician sprinkled a corona rapid test with a few drops of cola. Three minutes later the test showed a result: It was positive. So Coke triggered such a result.
After demonstrating a positive result, Schnedlitz goes on to slam the tests as a waste of taxpayer resources.
“Mr. President, we are likely to have a problem now, we have a positive corona test in parliament, namely this cola triggered a positive corona test. I don’t know how to deal with it now! With things like this you are throwing tens of millions of euros in tax money out of the window instead of providing real protection for old people’s and nursing homes, instead of investing money in our hospitals.”
According to a report from oe24.at, Schnedlitz proceeded to slam the government’s lockdown, saying:
“A ‘dictatorship light’ was set up by the ÖVP and the Greens and the Austrians Their fundamental rights, such as their civil rights and the right to freedom of expression – specifically, illegal ordinances were issued and the authorities were asked to take action against their own people. ”
Schnedlitz continued his criticism on Facebook, where he called the tests “worthless”:
“Today I did a corona test live in parliament,” reads Schnedlitz’s post, translated from German. “The corona mass tests are worthless! This was also shown by a simple experiment in parliament, in which a cola had a positive result! But this black-green government spends tens of millions in tax money on precisely these tests.”
Michael Schnedlitz: „Minister Anschober, treten Sie und ihre Regierung zurück!“
In German
Following the experiment, another Austrian politician, ÖVP General Axel Melchior, dismissed Schnedlitz’s claims, and accused him of being drunk.
“You, I really do not understand what you are doing. I had the whole time hoped that this was not a Cola, but Bacardi-Cola – that would have justified your behavior a bit,” Melchior said, to which Schnedlitz responded by holding up his can of Coca Cola.
PCR TEST INVENTOR KARY MULLIS BASHES FAUCI: Did this interview get him killed just before the launch of the COVID-19 bioweapon?!
Posted on December 11, 2020 by State of the Nation
FacebookTwitterPinterestRedditEmailShare
___
http://stateofthenation.co/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/10-10-2020-mullis-on-fauci.mp4
Posted on December 11, 2020 by State of the Nation
FacebookTwitterPinterestRedditEmailShare
___
http://stateofthenation.co/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/10-10-2020-mullis-on-fauci.mp4
Last edited:
I have family that are in the medical field having to work the front lines with this thing. COVID is real. It's not fake and it is causing hospitals to fill.
That being said, this thing isn't quit what the media and liberal government officials proclaim. Most people died with COVID and not because of COVID. There is one study that seems to point to that 2/3 of the people who died with COVID would have died this year anyway. BUT there is another study that seems to indicate that most people who died would have lived an average of 11 more years if they didn't have COVID.
I truly understand the skepticism. I do. I DONT TRUST these people. But my eyes and ears and deaths indicate this thing is real. People would have lived longer if they wouldn't have had it.
But I also believe that we CANT STOP IT. It needs to run its course. Masks don't really help. They are a feel good measure. Shutdowns are NOT helping and are extremely arbitrary. They are only hurting more people. These liberal governors would rather control people than control the virus. Because there are things that could be done to mitigate and help and they are not doing it. They would rather shut things down, control the populace as a whole rather than really target those that are vulnerable.
That being said, this thing isn't quit what the media and liberal government officials proclaim. Most people died with COVID and not because of COVID. There is one study that seems to point to that 2/3 of the people who died with COVID would have died this year anyway. BUT there is another study that seems to indicate that most people who died would have lived an average of 11 more years if they didn't have COVID.
I truly understand the skepticism. I do. I DONT TRUST these people. But my eyes and ears and deaths indicate this thing is real. People would have lived longer if they wouldn't have had it.
But I also believe that we CANT STOP IT. It needs to run its course. Masks don't really help. They are a feel good measure. Shutdowns are NOT helping and are extremely arbitrary. They are only hurting more people. These liberal governors would rather control people than control the virus. Because there are things that could be done to mitigate and help and they are not doing it. They would rather shut things down, control the populace as a whole rather than really target those that are vulnerable.
I'm certainty not going to twist your elbow. Believe as you will...I just hope you know that this thing has never been isolated and sequenced yet, or purified. They cannot reproduce it in a lab because they do not have any quantity in hand.... it seems to be a very slippery customer, indeed
Triumph1300
Well-Known Member
Indeed, given a choice between a can of Coca Cola and a can of beer, always choose the beer for health purposes... in spite of the common belief that the beer is worse. For one can, the Coke is most certainly worse. When my wife was pregnant with our first child her an old Dutch obstetrician recommended she drink a can of beer daily to improve her milk. She took his advice and our son, perhaps partially because of that improved milk, is around today and a grandfather himself.
Give God the glory!
Vaccinated Children Are Sicker, Study Shows
12/12/2020 BY STILLNESS IN THE STORM LEAVE A COMMENT
(Jennifer Margulis) For over two decades, vaccine safety advocates have wondered if vaccinated children are sicker or healthier than their unvaccinated peers. These children’s health advocates have asked the CDC to conduct studies to compare health outcomes in completely unvaccinated children to those in vaccinated children, as per the CDC’s recommended schedule.
Related Airports Begin Testing ‘COVID Passport’ That Will Record Whether Someone Has Been Vaccinated Before Travel
Source – Prepare For Change
by Jennifer Margulis, December 3rd, 2020
Every parent in America, and every doctor recommending vaccines, should want to see these studies done.
After all, in order to put the vaccine debates to rest, we must demonstrate that the current CDC-recommended vaccine schedule is actually safe.
But, despite constant hand-wringing over declining public confidence in vaccines, the CDC refuses to do these studies.
Their excuse has been that “it would be unethical” to withhold vaccines in order to study their safety.
This excuse assumes that randomized controlled trials, where children are randomly separated into two groups, one which gets vaccines and one which does not, are the only way to do such a comparison.
(If you’re wondering right now why it’s “unethical” to withhold vaccines to determine their safety but not unethical to recommend them for every infant before they are determined to be safe, you’re not alone.)
But these days plenty of families are choosing not to vaccinate or to selectively vaccinate. Their children can easily serve as the control groups. So the CDC could perform retrospective epidemiological studies. After all, it is retrospective epidemiological studies that are the studies the CDC has done that purportedly “prove” that “vaccines don’t cause autism.”
Vaccine safety concerns ignored
But the CDC continues to turn a deaf ear to vaccine safety concerns, ignoring the fact that hundreds of thousands of parents, like this one, this one, and this one, have watched their children’s health decline after being given vaccines, Tylenol, and antibiotics. In fact, they seem to go out of their way to design health studies that do not include vaccine status as a variable.
At the same time, they disingenuously point to studies which compare vaccinated children with only slightly less vaccinated children and say, “See, we have done it!”
It’s almost as if our public health authorities don’t want to know which children are healthiest.
Why not?
Vaccinated children are sicker
Aware of the firestorm surrounding vaccine science, James Lyons-Weiler, Ph.D. and Paul Thomas, M.D.’s analysis is scrupulous and thorough. They analyzed the data several different ways to account for potentially confounding factors, such as an increasing tendency to avoid vaccination. They compared the new metric (RIOV) with the old measure of incidence. And they found that the new method correlates well but is more sensitive, thus more likely to reveal a true negative effect than the old one.
So what did Drs. Lyons-Weiler and Thomas find?
The results: cumulative office visits for asthma, allergic rhinitis, breathing issues, behavioral issues, ADHD, respiratory infection, otitis media, ear pain, other infections, eye disorders, eczema, and dermatitis were all much higher in vaccinated children than unvaccinated children.
In even the most conservative analysis, the study finds statistically significant elevated risks of anemia and respiratory virus infection in the vaccinated children.
A conscientious pediatrician
Dr. Paul Thomas is a pediatrician with some 15,000 children in his Portland-based practice. He has such a large cohort of patients that researchers can study the data from his practice.
Dr. Paul, as his patients call him, is a friend and colleague of mine. We co-wrote The Vaccine-Friendly Plan: Dr. Paul’s Safe and Effective Approach to Immunity and Health – from Pregnancy through Your Child’s Teen Years together.
As a Dartmouth-educated physician who grew up the son of missionaries in Africa, Dr. Paul has always had a healthy respect for vaccines. But the more he observed the children in his large, diverse practice, the less comfortable he became with the CDC schedule. He watched as parents followed his health recommendations and saw their seemingly healthy children develop neurological disorders and other severe health conditions. Most often the health problems came after a round of vaccines. And Dr. Paul also noticed that families who were spacing out vaccines, or not vaccinating at all, seem to have healthier kids.
Dr. Paul wanted to know how vaccinating was affecting his patient population. So he hired an independent statistician to collect billing and medical records. He then teamed up with James Lyons-Weiler, PhD, an expert in study design, to analyze the data.
For this study they analyzed records of 3,324 patients born into Dr. Paul’s practice between June 8, 2008, and January 27, 2019. Of these children 561 are completely unvaccinated, and 2,763, received anywhere between 1 and 40 vaccines.
Lower incidence of vaccine injury
In Dr. Paul’s practice parents choose which vaccines their children receive in consultation with their doctors. Very few follow the CDC-recommended schedule. Instead, Dr. Paul helps families make personalized decisions, one vaccine at a time.
In addition to taking medical history into account (especially a family history of autoimmunity), the doctors at Integrative Pediatrics deliberately keep exposure to aluminum-containing vaccines to a minimum.
This way no child receives high doses of aluminum in a single day, and overall accumulation of aluminum is low.
Avoiding an overload of injected aluminum reduces adverse effects of vaccination, especially neurological disorders like ADHD and autism. These disorders have recently been strongly linked with high aluminum adjuvant exposure. Thus, the incidence of autism in Dr. Paul’s study population is only about half the national average. And there are no cases of ADHD in the unvaccinated children.
How sick are they?
It seems clear that vaccinated children are sicker than their unvaccinated peers. But just how sick?
Because most of his families do not follow the CDC to the letter, even the study’s most vaccinated group cannot be considered “fully vaccinated” according to the CDC. Even this study, then, may be missing the true dangers of following CDC recommendations.
James Lyons-Weiler, Ph.D., is an outstanding scientist who has published over fifty-five peer-reviewed scientific papers. He developed a new metric for this study: relative incidence of office visits (RIOV). Often in studies of this type, relative incidence of a particular condition, say asthma or eczema, is used to search for evidence of harm. This approach counts every child with at least one office visit for a particular condition. But medicine is not an exact science. Putting a child solidly in one group or another based on just a single office visit can muddy the true picture.
By counting office visits (plural) related to the condition, we can get a much clearer picture of the healthcare burden of that condition. We can see not only which children are sick, but also how sick they are. RIOV is a more sensitive and more powerful measure because it counts the entire health burden. And the results are eye-opening.
---------------continued---------------
12/12/2020 BY STILLNESS IN THE STORM LEAVE A COMMENT
(Jennifer Margulis) For over two decades, vaccine safety advocates have wondered if vaccinated children are sicker or healthier than their unvaccinated peers. These children’s health advocates have asked the CDC to conduct studies to compare health outcomes in completely unvaccinated children to those in vaccinated children, as per the CDC’s recommended schedule.
Related Airports Begin Testing ‘COVID Passport’ That Will Record Whether Someone Has Been Vaccinated Before Travel
Source – Prepare For Change
by Jennifer Margulis, December 3rd, 2020
Every parent in America, and every doctor recommending vaccines, should want to see these studies done.
After all, in order to put the vaccine debates to rest, we must demonstrate that the current CDC-recommended vaccine schedule is actually safe.
But, despite constant hand-wringing over declining public confidence in vaccines, the CDC refuses to do these studies.
Their excuse has been that “it would be unethical” to withhold vaccines in order to study their safety.
This excuse assumes that randomized controlled trials, where children are randomly separated into two groups, one which gets vaccines and one which does not, are the only way to do such a comparison.
(If you’re wondering right now why it’s “unethical” to withhold vaccines to determine their safety but not unethical to recommend them for every infant before they are determined to be safe, you’re not alone.)
But these days plenty of families are choosing not to vaccinate or to selectively vaccinate. Their children can easily serve as the control groups. So the CDC could perform retrospective epidemiological studies. After all, it is retrospective epidemiological studies that are the studies the CDC has done that purportedly “prove” that “vaccines don’t cause autism.”
Vaccine safety concerns ignored
But the CDC continues to turn a deaf ear to vaccine safety concerns, ignoring the fact that hundreds of thousands of parents, like this one, this one, and this one, have watched their children’s health decline after being given vaccines, Tylenol, and antibiotics. In fact, they seem to go out of their way to design health studies that do not include vaccine status as a variable.
At the same time, they disingenuously point to studies which compare vaccinated children with only slightly less vaccinated children and say, “See, we have done it!”
It’s almost as if our public health authorities don’t want to know which children are healthiest.
Why not?
Vaccinated children are sicker
Aware of the firestorm surrounding vaccine science, James Lyons-Weiler, Ph.D. and Paul Thomas, M.D.’s analysis is scrupulous and thorough. They analyzed the data several different ways to account for potentially confounding factors, such as an increasing tendency to avoid vaccination. They compared the new metric (RIOV) with the old measure of incidence. And they found that the new method correlates well but is more sensitive, thus more likely to reveal a true negative effect than the old one.
So what did Drs. Lyons-Weiler and Thomas find?
The results: cumulative office visits for asthma, allergic rhinitis, breathing issues, behavioral issues, ADHD, respiratory infection, otitis media, ear pain, other infections, eye disorders, eczema, and dermatitis were all much higher in vaccinated children than unvaccinated children.
In even the most conservative analysis, the study finds statistically significant elevated risks of anemia and respiratory virus infection in the vaccinated children.
A conscientious pediatrician
Dr. Paul Thomas is a pediatrician with some 15,000 children in his Portland-based practice. He has such a large cohort of patients that researchers can study the data from his practice.
Dr. Paul, as his patients call him, is a friend and colleague of mine. We co-wrote The Vaccine-Friendly Plan: Dr. Paul’s Safe and Effective Approach to Immunity and Health – from Pregnancy through Your Child’s Teen Years together.
As a Dartmouth-educated physician who grew up the son of missionaries in Africa, Dr. Paul has always had a healthy respect for vaccines. But the more he observed the children in his large, diverse practice, the less comfortable he became with the CDC schedule. He watched as parents followed his health recommendations and saw their seemingly healthy children develop neurological disorders and other severe health conditions. Most often the health problems came after a round of vaccines. And Dr. Paul also noticed that families who were spacing out vaccines, or not vaccinating at all, seem to have healthier kids.
Dr. Paul wanted to know how vaccinating was affecting his patient population. So he hired an independent statistician to collect billing and medical records. He then teamed up with James Lyons-Weiler, PhD, an expert in study design, to analyze the data.
For this study they analyzed records of 3,324 patients born into Dr. Paul’s practice between June 8, 2008, and January 27, 2019. Of these children 561 are completely unvaccinated, and 2,763, received anywhere between 1 and 40 vaccines.
Lower incidence of vaccine injury
In Dr. Paul’s practice parents choose which vaccines their children receive in consultation with their doctors. Very few follow the CDC-recommended schedule. Instead, Dr. Paul helps families make personalized decisions, one vaccine at a time.
In addition to taking medical history into account (especially a family history of autoimmunity), the doctors at Integrative Pediatrics deliberately keep exposure to aluminum-containing vaccines to a minimum.
This way no child receives high doses of aluminum in a single day, and overall accumulation of aluminum is low.
Avoiding an overload of injected aluminum reduces adverse effects of vaccination, especially neurological disorders like ADHD and autism. These disorders have recently been strongly linked with high aluminum adjuvant exposure. Thus, the incidence of autism in Dr. Paul’s study population is only about half the national average. And there are no cases of ADHD in the unvaccinated children.
How sick are they?
It seems clear that vaccinated children are sicker than their unvaccinated peers. But just how sick?
Because most of his families do not follow the CDC to the letter, even the study’s most vaccinated group cannot be considered “fully vaccinated” according to the CDC. Even this study, then, may be missing the true dangers of following CDC recommendations.
James Lyons-Weiler, Ph.D., is an outstanding scientist who has published over fifty-five peer-reviewed scientific papers. He developed a new metric for this study: relative incidence of office visits (RIOV). Often in studies of this type, relative incidence of a particular condition, say asthma or eczema, is used to search for evidence of harm. This approach counts every child with at least one office visit for a particular condition. But medicine is not an exact science. Putting a child solidly in one group or another based on just a single office visit can muddy the true picture.
By counting office visits (plural) related to the condition, we can get a much clearer picture of the healthcare burden of that condition. We can see not only which children are sick, but also how sick they are. RIOV is a more sensitive and more powerful measure because it counts the entire health burden. And the results are eye-opening.
---------------continued---------------
Healthy user bias
The concern in an epidemiological study is that healthy children are going to be vaccinated more often than unhealthy children. This is especially true in flu vaccine studies because people will only get the flu vaccine if they are healthy to begin with. This healthy user bias—the tendency for healthy people to accept risks of preventative vaccination more frequently than unhealthy people—would usually mean that if there were a negative effect of vaccination it would be masked. So we should expect to see fewer illnesses in the vaccinated group. Not only because vaccines prevent illness but also because the children being vaccinated presumably started out healthier. However, despite concerns about healthy user bias, the unvaccinated children were much healthier than the vaccinated children.
Critics might suggest that the number of office visits is lower in unvaccinated children not because they’re sick less often but because those families don’t trust doctors. Or perhaps because the parents are negligent and less likely to bring their kids in for standard medical care. However, in the study accounts for that possibility by comparing well child visits, which were almost identical in the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. At the same time, office visits for fever, a known side effect of vaccination, were higher in the vaccinated group.
Chickenpox, pertussis, and rotavirus
The only illnesses more common in unvaccinated children were diseases we vaccinate for: chickenpox, pertussis, and rotavirus. Of 561 unvaccinated children, 9 got pertussis. Of the 2,763 children in the vaccinated group only one got it. There were only two cases of rotavirus in the unvaccinated group and none in the vaccinated group. There were 23 cases of chickenpox in the unvaccinated group and 6 in the vaccinated group. All recovered without incident.
Of course, if vaccines are at all effective, this would be expected. Surprisingly, perhaps, this increased risk still resulted in a low rate of illness in the unvaccinated group. This suggests that incidence of vaccine-preventable illnesses would not skyrocket if vaccination rates declined.
Findings dovetail with other research showing vaccinated children are sicker
This study’s findings that vaccinated children are sicker than their unvaccinated peers agree with other independent studies. Mawson et al. reported increased risk of numerous conditions. These conditions included allergic rhinitis, neurodevelopmental disorders, eczema, and chronic illness.
Studies on the effect of DPT vaccines introduced in the African country of Guinea-Bissau reported increased risk of death in children who received the vaccine.
McDonald et al. found that delayed DPT vaccination led to significantly decreased risk of asthma.
Most recently, Brian Hooker and Neil Miller, using medical records from three medical practices, found more than twice the rate of developmental delay, asthma, and ear infection in vaccinated children.
If comparing health outcomes in vaccinated versus unvaccinated children led to reassuring conclusions about vaccine safety, the CDC would be doing these studies with alacrity.
In fact, such comparisons yield worrisome results. Studies that include completely unvaccinated children continue to show they are healthier and that completely vaccinated children are sicker. This suggests that our determination to prevent disease may not be working. It is becoming increasingly clear that over-vaccination is making our children sick—very sick.
Read the study for yourself. Print out a copy and share it with your child’s pediatrician. We need more of this kind of science. The CDC must start funding well designed studies with statistically significant numbers of children. Until they do, it’s the independent researchers willing to stick their necks out to tell the truth who will help us find the best way forward.
Curious to learn more about raising healthy children? This interview I did with Carmen Pritson, an Estonian television journalist, is full of helpful information:
---------------------Vaccines damage you more than they protect, period---------------------
The concern in an epidemiological study is that healthy children are going to be vaccinated more often than unhealthy children. This is especially true in flu vaccine studies because people will only get the flu vaccine if they are healthy to begin with. This healthy user bias—the tendency for healthy people to accept risks of preventative vaccination more frequently than unhealthy people—would usually mean that if there were a negative effect of vaccination it would be masked. So we should expect to see fewer illnesses in the vaccinated group. Not only because vaccines prevent illness but also because the children being vaccinated presumably started out healthier. However, despite concerns about healthy user bias, the unvaccinated children were much healthier than the vaccinated children.
Critics might suggest that the number of office visits is lower in unvaccinated children not because they’re sick less often but because those families don’t trust doctors. Or perhaps because the parents are negligent and less likely to bring their kids in for standard medical care. However, in the study accounts for that possibility by comparing well child visits, which were almost identical in the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. At the same time, office visits for fever, a known side effect of vaccination, were higher in the vaccinated group.
Chickenpox, pertussis, and rotavirus
The only illnesses more common in unvaccinated children were diseases we vaccinate for: chickenpox, pertussis, and rotavirus. Of 561 unvaccinated children, 9 got pertussis. Of the 2,763 children in the vaccinated group only one got it. There were only two cases of rotavirus in the unvaccinated group and none in the vaccinated group. There were 23 cases of chickenpox in the unvaccinated group and 6 in the vaccinated group. All recovered without incident.
Of course, if vaccines are at all effective, this would be expected. Surprisingly, perhaps, this increased risk still resulted in a low rate of illness in the unvaccinated group. This suggests that incidence of vaccine-preventable illnesses would not skyrocket if vaccination rates declined.
Findings dovetail with other research showing vaccinated children are sicker
This study’s findings that vaccinated children are sicker than their unvaccinated peers agree with other independent studies. Mawson et al. reported increased risk of numerous conditions. These conditions included allergic rhinitis, neurodevelopmental disorders, eczema, and chronic illness.
Studies on the effect of DPT vaccines introduced in the African country of Guinea-Bissau reported increased risk of death in children who received the vaccine.
McDonald et al. found that delayed DPT vaccination led to significantly decreased risk of asthma.
Most recently, Brian Hooker and Neil Miller, using medical records from three medical practices, found more than twice the rate of developmental delay, asthma, and ear infection in vaccinated children.
If comparing health outcomes in vaccinated versus unvaccinated children led to reassuring conclusions about vaccine safety, the CDC would be doing these studies with alacrity.
In fact, such comparisons yield worrisome results. Studies that include completely unvaccinated children continue to show they are healthier and that completely vaccinated children are sicker. This suggests that our determination to prevent disease may not be working. It is becoming increasingly clear that over-vaccination is making our children sick—very sick.
Read the study for yourself. Print out a copy and share it with your child’s pediatrician. We need more of this kind of science. The CDC must start funding well designed studies with statistically significant numbers of children. Until they do, it’s the independent researchers willing to stick their necks out to tell the truth who will help us find the best way forward.
Curious to learn more about raising healthy children? This interview I did with Carmen Pritson, an Estonian television journalist, is full of helpful information:
---------------------Vaccines damage you more than they protect, period---------------------
When I was a child we were only vaxed for around 6 things but nowadays it's much more.
What I have seen in dogs and cats over my life time was that they were always healthy that had never had anything injected into them at all, until they were old then they had problems, but with the Dogs from say the 90's on boy have I seen some problems with even from 2yo having big problems.
All my family's cats were wild things vicious if you messed with them, but I see cats now that are just so docile that I can not believe it, my baby brothers kids were laying over their cat and the cat was a huge cat and it just tried to craw away out from under them, boy not the cats that we had as kids would put up with that at all.
As to my 2 dogs they ran 20miles in a day easy on the weekend when we went out dirt bike riding, I think a dog that sit's in the back yard nowadays like they do for years would not help with their health may have much to do with it as well.
A mate that was dying when sick gave me his Labrador and I took it for a walk around the block and it only made it half way around but the next day 3/4 and the next it just made it. boy it improved fast the next day it did 2 blocks and the next I had it swimming, I picked it up and tossed it in the dam and it got scared and crawled out worried and I tossed it in again and tossed in a stick and from then it would jumped in swimming and loved the game.
What I have seen in dogs and cats over my life time was that they were always healthy that had never had anything injected into them at all, until they were old then they had problems, but with the Dogs from say the 90's on boy have I seen some problems with even from 2yo having big problems.
All my family's cats were wild things vicious if you messed with them, but I see cats now that are just so docile that I can not believe it, my baby brothers kids were laying over their cat and the cat was a huge cat and it just tried to craw away out from under them, boy not the cats that we had as kids would put up with that at all.
As to my 2 dogs they ran 20miles in a day easy on the weekend when we went out dirt bike riding, I think a dog that sit's in the back yard nowadays like they do for years would not help with their health may have much to do with it as well.
A mate that was dying when sick gave me his Labrador and I took it for a walk around the block and it only made it half way around but the next day 3/4 and the next it just made it. boy it improved fast the next day it did 2 blocks and the next I had it swimming, I picked it up and tossed it in the dam and it got scared and crawled out worried and I tossed it in again and tossed in a stick and from then it would jumped in swimming and loved the game.
The govt ran schools has gone crazy with vaxxing kids....they are ignorant and/or indifferent to it and even get more dough for this service. They really don't care about your kid or mine, if we have any at home of course. Bureaucratic organizations are impersonal by their very nature and purpose. And they have the gall to impose their will onto you, through dictatorial school boards and administrations onto your family and your right to choose what's best for those little ones. And the thing is, most families just seem to go along with it all. No wonder a world government is thinkable, realistic and coming to a town and home near you and even at your doorstep, say in the next decade or so.
I say, think local and not global, and get the kids into private or home schooling if that still exists in your area....I'm in the minority for sure
He could have just recommended brewer's yeast or a B-complex vitamin. Brewer's yeast+adequate water intake helped me when I was nursing 2 babies at a time.
- Status
Similar threads
