Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
.Naw, that right has been reserved for you. View attachment 41456
Good night View attachment 41457
And I depart this conversation with one more deflection..... GO Chiefs!!!
.OK, this one is gonna shock you:
John 9:22 relates that the parents of the blind man whose sight Jesus had restored “were afraid of the Jews; for the Jews had already agreed that anyone who confessed Jesus to be the Messiah would be put out of the synagogue.” (A similar reference occurs later, in John 12:42, right after Jesus’ final entry into Jerusalem.) Was Jesus’ following really so large at the time this blind man got his sight that the Jewish authorities would have passed such a decree? John’s gospel goes on to suggest that the real impetus for defections to the Jesus camp was the raising of Lazarus, for according to John 12:11 “it was on account of him that many of the Jews were deserting and were believing in Jesus.” But even assuming that John’s gospel is not chronological and that Lazarus’ resurrection preceded the healing of the blind man, is it likely that the chief priests would have already adopted an expulsion edict as a counter measure to widespread acceptance of Jesus as the Christ?
I don’t think so. It seems far more probable to me that such an edict came much later – perhaps more than half a century later, when John wrote his gospel for a community of believers who had experienced precisely such an expulsion, as Jesus reportedly predicted would happen in John 16:2. (James Louis Martyn’s book History and Theology in the Fourth Gospel makes a rather convincing case for this.)
Those who insist that everything written in the gospels is historically accurate in every respect, down to the last detail, will disagree with this. “Of course the Jewish authorities had promulgated such an edict before the blind man got his sight; John’s gospel says so! End of story!” Not for me. I ask myself (and them) how our faith would be diminished if we granted the anachronism, i.e., if John took a later edict and placed it in his story as encouragement for his readership contemporaneously facing such a decree. And I answer, “Not at all.”
To my thinking, John’s gospel was never intended to be a historical record. Its author’s purpose in writing was not to chronicle but to persuade. He says so himself in 20:31 (“But these are written so that you may come to believe that Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God, and that through believing you may have life in his name.”). It is this element of the gospel – “if you believe, you may have life in his name” – which mattered to the author and which should matter to us. It is unnecessary to hold to the literal truth of each and every one of the events recounted; the message of the gospel must be believed, and that message conveys theological truth, not necessarily literal truth. (The Lazarus story itself may well fall into this category, given that this supposedly notorious miracle is never mentioned in any of the earlier-written synoptic gospels.)
OK, take you shots at me as a heretic . . .
A little bit. But it's who I am. I test everything for rationality. Children believe in all sorts of irrational things pushed on them by authority figures. They don't or can’t question in the same way adults do. Maybe Matt. 18:3 is an insidious verse inserted by the author to cut off the type of intellectual struggling with the Scriptures that I engage in. Or maybe it really is the Word of the Boss explaining how we must ascend that mountain, blind hand-hold to blind hand-hold. Perhaps we just have to let go of the “safe” knobs of reason if we are to get any higher..
I have to admit that your enthusiasm for critical thought is refreshing.
I predict it has gotten you into lots of trouble - lol.
'
![]()
'
You might enjoy this topic if you haven't seen it yet.Yes, and we may distinguish this by acknowledging that the Law Jesus tried to show us was the law of Morality. Found within the conscience of the heart. Not on physicle stone tablets (or paper as they do it today).
Question: Does the Sabbath point to creation, or does creation point to the Sabbath?For in six days the LORD made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, and rested the seventh day. Therefore the LORD blessed the Sabbath day and hallowed it.
![]()
'
Well, I wasn't planning on putting the cupcake on top of the popcorn, no...And what a way to top off buttered popcorn, am I right?!!
'
Genesis 1:1What?
Why?
That's ridiculous.
/
.A little bit. But it's who I am. I test everything for rationality. Children believe in all sorts of irrational things pushed on them by authority figures. They don't or can’t question in the same way adults do. Maybe Matt. 18:3 is an insidious verse inserted by the author to cut off the type of intellectual struggling with the Scriptures that I engage in. Or maybe it really is the Word of the Boss explaining how we must ascend that mountain, blind hand-hold to blind hand-hold. Perhaps we just have to let go of the “safe” knobs of reason if we are to get any higher.
At times I have a fondness for that view. It would be a relief to drop all these heavy ropes and pitons I brought for the ascent. But when I look down and see the abyss, I get self-reliant again, and just shift my tools to the other shoulder. Having found them useful at various levels, I suspect I’ll never let them go entirely.
.Question: Does the Sabbath point to creation, or does creation point to the Sabbath?
(the word Sabbath does not appear until Exodus chapter 16)
/
The weekly Sabbath tells people who you worship and why because the 4th commandment says:
Exodus 20:8-11
8 Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy.
9 Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work:
10 But the seventh day is the sabbath of the Lord thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates:
11 For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.
This is the only one of the ten that tells you who you are worshipping and why. Take out the 4th commandment as many seem to want, and the Ten Commandments might as well have been written by Warren Buffet or whoever is being followed these days in the investing circles.
You appear to be defrocked.Don't make meyou, SS.
.You appear to be defrocked.
Are you a free man now?
I could threaten you with IGNORE. - LOL
/
Who we worship? Tied into creation?So we see Who we worship...
Yup - LOL.
Hey, don't let that get out, now.
Yeah, you could be "that guy" - lol.
While I'm being "this guy."
'
![]()
'
Exodus 20:2 - I am the Lord your God, who brought YOU out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.The weekly Sabbath tells people who you worship and why because the 4th commandment says:
Exodus 20:8-11
8 Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy.
9 Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work:
10 But the seventh day is the sabbath of the Lord thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates:
11 For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.
This is the only one of the ten that tells you who you are worshipping and why. Take out the 4th commandment as many seem to want, and the Ten Commandments might as well have been written by Warren Buffet or whoever is being followed these days in the investing circles.
And how do we show our love...John 14:15"By this all will know that you are My disciples, if you have love for one another." John 13:35
.Yup - LOL
You used to be "the guy".
While I was "that guy".
Now you're "this guy".
I'm still "that guy".
At least one of us is making progress.
/