Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Right.The Logos never was not.
The Word is the eternal manifestation of the Fathers heart realised by the Power of the Spirit.
And Yahweh "said". Because of our translations in English, we don't see Yahweh's name in our bibles. But, it is there. There is no doubt about Who created.Right.
The Logos (logic/reason/meaning/plan) preceded creation.
And THAT Logos BECAME flesh and dwelt among us.
/
Save it as an image on your computer and then view it as a picture. You can enlarge it to read it.
Notice how you contradict yourself.Back to the Logos - I believe that folks apply human thinking to the ways of God especially when it comes to chronology.
Before Abraham was I AM
By the way I love the response to 'I AM'
Yeshua 'Yes you are..'. sorry I digress
So when God collides with the created order He doesn't become subject to time.
Can you not see this flagrantly open contradiction in that sentence?Take the Cross - a timeless event anchored in History yet spanning all of time.
This harkens to a heresy that I'll ignore for now because if God isn't timeless, this is a moot point.OT saints washed in His Blood like you or I...
No, it was definitely NOT His blood that saved the first born children in Egypt! Who on Earth taught you such a thing?Jesus offers His body and blood to the disciples to eat before He is sacrificed - surely they partake of His resurrected body and blood which has never not existed. Was it not His Blood that saved the first born at passover?
Before, after, offered (past tense) - how many time words can on man use while trying to undermine the same concept?Was not a sacrificed lamb to be eaten after being offered and not before?
This much, as stated, we agree on.The Logos never was not.
No it isn't. The Word IS GOD HIMSELF!The Word is the eternal manifestation of the Fathers heart realised by the Power of the Spirit.
Exactly!Jesus was given the Name of the Father (John 17) because they are One.
Nonsense.And so I have learned to kneel before the Cross and unload because the Cross is occurring in every moment of time.
Let God be true and every man a liar, especially those who would have us believe in fairy tails that have nothing to do with either scripture nor sound reason.Let God be timeless.
Logos is the root word for the English word "logic", Carl. I'm not so sure He be too happy with Logos being used to perpetuate the irrational and totally unbiblical notion that God is timeless.Let Jesus the Logos be timeless.
This sentence is the leper's bell of the approaching con artist who wants you to believe something in contradiction to your mind. Something that he cannot defend with any argument but must merely extend as a totally unsupported claim and then declare anyone who doesn't buy as either impious or heretical or both.Jesus is beyond the gramatical rules we apply in language.
God's ways are higher than our ways, Carl, not lower! God is not irrational! On the contrary, John 1 teaches explicitly that God Himself is Reason! That's what "Logos" means and that is definitely what John's Greek speaking audience would have instantly understood him to be saying in those first several verse of his gospel. "Logos" was the term that the Greeks used in reference to the "divine reason" that they believed was responsible for the order observed in the universe and that explained why our minds work and why things like mathematics work. It was that specific concept that John was intentionally employing. You simply don't get to use "Logos" to defend rational absurdities such as "timeless existence", which would be a durationless existence and therefore a nonexistent existence, which is obviously nonsensical and false.All Glory to Him... way beyond what we could ask or think.
If that were true, then you could go backward or forward in time as you please. But you can't. It is not simply an idea. Time is a physical quantity. It can be measured. When we say God is outside of time, we mean that he is not constrained by time. There is no indication in God's word that time exists outside of this physical universe.Time is not a place or a thing, Carl. Time is an idea. It's nothing more than a way of speaking about events relative to other events. If one thing happens and then something else happens, that's time! If God does one thing and then another, He experiences time, by definition. As such you cannot speak of God doing anything outside of time without contradicting yourself just as you've done above. That isn't your fault, really, by the way. It isn't an error in the way you stated it but in the very concept itself. No one could ever avoid such a contradiction because the very concept of "doing" presupposes the concept of time, which is just the conceptual manner in which we communicate information about the duration and sequence of events.
Time is not a place or a thing, Carl. Time is an idea. It's nothing more than a way of speaking about events relative to other events.
The question came up in the Godhead thread: When something changes state of being (or form, or substance, or whatever you call its particular manifestation at a particular moment), like when the Logos became Jesus, is it existentially continuous with what it was before? In other words, was the Logos still the Logos when that one became Jesus?Our knee-jerk thought is to jump to the meaning that Christ was the Logos.
Which is true by extension. But what was the Logos BEFORE the Logos became flesh?
Agree.The question came up in the Godhead thread: When something changes state of being (or form, or substance, or whatever you call its particular manifestation at a particular moment), like when the Logos became Jesus, is it existentially continuous with what it was before? In other words, was the Logos still the Logos when that one became Jesus?
LOL(Am I the same being now that I was when I was 40 years younger and 35 lbs. lighter and had an anterior cruciate ligament? I really should've bought that philosophy prof a beer.)
In other words, Jesus wasn't the Logos until the Logos became Jesus? Was the Logos still the Logos after it became Jesus?I object to the idea that Jesus was God before the Logos became flesh.
How do you handle Colossians 1:16, which specifically makes Jesus instrumental in Creation?I object to the idea that Jesus was God before the Logos became flesh.
Sorry, 5-year-old @St. SteVen, you can't have a beer.Was the 5-year-old @St. SteVen still @St. SteVen?
![]()
This deceptive attempt of circular reasoning is a bust. Might as well just sit this one out with a cold brew..just sayingIn other words, Jesus wasn't the Logos until the Logos became Jesus? Was the Logos still the Logos after it became Jesus?
Was the 5-year-old @St. SteVen still @St. SteVen?
![]()
I would say, yes.Was the Logos still the Logos after it became Jesus?
More like, was the twinkle in my father's eye SteVen before SteVen was born?Was the 5-year-old @St. SteVen still @St. SteVen?
I thought you might bring that up.How do you handle Colossians 1:16, which specifically makes Jesus instrumental in Creation?
16 For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him.
Jesus wasn't instrumental in creation, only the WORD was. And the WORD was not visible because the FATHER, WORD, HOLY SPIRIT were all three invisible SPIRIT.How do you handle Colossians 1:16, which specifically makes Jesus instrumental in Creation?
16 for in him (as the WORD which became a FLESH body) all things were created,16 For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him.