VictoryinJesus
Well-Known Member
- Jan 26, 2017
- 10,559
- 8,408
- 113
- Faith
- Christian
- Country
- United States
Not disputing that.But Jesus said the lust for wanting to have (own her?) was adultery in his heart.
Matthew 5:28 NIV
But I tell you that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully
has already committed adultery with her in his heart.
/
Only brought it up for this reason: if we say Eve …or Adam …added the “don’t touch” what is desirable. Then if we then turn around and say it’s okay to look as long as you do not touch…isn’t it the same thing of changing or adding to as you pointed out Jesus said if you lust after a woman in your heart then you have already (eaten? Tasted?) of adultery. Yet sometimes I hear it changed or added to “you can look as long as you don’t touch”. my only point is in sometimes condemning Eve or Adam for the changing of or the adding to the word…saying “it’s okay to look as long as you do not touch” is the same thing. the same thing they condemn in the beginning of what God said of that tree they were not to eat of, changing or adding “don’t touch”….just thinking out loud. Can see how the serpent could really mess with their mind…did God say not to eat of it or don’t touch it? I don’t even know if I can answer that question. The ultimate gaslighting…before there was a term for it.
Last edited: