How could any "Christian" vote for Dems that fight for the right to kill 60 million babies???
- Thread starter GISMYS_7
- Start date
-
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Agree. God is not woke, not progressive, but consistent and unchanging, and likewise is his word and principles.
The word Progresive ? has been stolen !
What is claimed Progresive nowadays is what was called regressive in fact !
So how did the Satanist make that call ! Such is in fact a deception and a delusion in fact !
So looking at such from a younger generation, they must think that Progresive means somthing in another light ? because that's is the direction given them ?
Everyone knows that progressive means advancing forward in a good way, making progress ? like a new model car was once a progress from the out going model ? better everything by rights ! it should be ! but if a new model came out that failed and became a Lemon in many ways that would not be called progresisve but regressive !
Another word that has been bastardised is wicked ! that ment in my up bring. one who was Sinful, imoral, spitful, malice. a real bastard ! but this word has been turned around 180 deg to mean Awesome etc ? How outright Satanic !
Your child comes home with a new mate and says, that such a one is wicked ? In my day's such a one would be refused to come home by my parents, Period ! I would be banned from having anything to do with such a one !
But How could such a change in a Name come about ? Satanist have created such for sure ! Many other words as well have been Stolen and bastardised in fact.
Taken
Well-Known Member
How could any "Christian" vote for Dems that fight for the right to kill 60 million babies???
“Christian or not”….we have decades of children being raise ON Drugs, with the psychobabble concept that they are ENTITLED to take, have, do, demand whatever and whenever they please …because they EXIST.
They have become fast-tracked unruly, mouthy, skilled liars, cheats, sneaks, bully’s, druggies, manipulators…and hang their pride on those accomplishments….
Be sure to THANK a public school administrator …. For a job well done raising your children to be the lowest denominator of the human chain.
noting…. Not all children….but enough to markedly notice the disgusting and sad INCREASE in the rampant decline of high moral standards being a priority to Teach and Reward children accordingly.
“Christian or not”….we have decades of children being raise ON Drugs, with the psychobabble concept that they are ENTITLED to take, have, do, demand whatever and whenever they please …because they EXIST.
They have become fast-tracked unruly, mouthy, skilled liars, cheats, sneaks, bully’s, druggies, manipulators…and hang their pride on those accomplishments….
Be sure to THANK a public school administrator …. For a job well done raising your children to be the lowest denominator of the human chain.
noting…. Not all children….but enough to markedly notice the disgusting and sad INCREASE in the rampant decline of high moral standards being a priority to Teach and Reward children accordingly.
The left morons are evil and are continually manipulating words and their meanings to suit and further their evil agendas.
Arthur81
Well-Known Member
People who identify as 'pro-life' believe that life begins at conception and that the unborn have a right to life.
"Life does not begin at fertilization. The egg is alive; the sperm is alive; and after fertilization, the zygote is alive. Life is continuous. Dichotomous thinking (0% human life for the egg, 100% human life for the zygote) is not scientific. It is religious thinking." American Society for Reproductive Medicine [Notice, it is "religious thinking", not unanimous Christian belief.]
"We do not witness a human death when an embryo fails to survive cryopreservation. We observe the continuous nature of human life, with fertilization representing only one key step, and know that from a biologic point of view, no new life begins when fertilization is achieved. Let us be clear that 'life begins at conception' is a religious, not a scientific, concept." It is worth repeating: “life begins at conception” is a religious, not scientific, concept
To prohibit abortion from the moment of conception violates the religious rights of many creationists in the Christian community. A human being, a person does not exist until the soul is created in the unborn at some point. Many place that at viability or approximately 24 weeks. Laws making abortion illegal before at the least, 15 weeks, violates the U.S. Constitutional concept of religious liberty and is fairly stated in the 1647 Westminster Confession of Faith:
Chapter 20 on Christian Liberty and Liberty of Conscience -
"God alone is Lord of the conscience, and hath left it free from the doctrines and commandments of men which are in any thing contrary to His Word, or beside it in matters of faith or worship. So that to believe such doctrines, or to obey such commandments out of conscience, is to betray true liberty of conscience; and the requiring an implicit faith, and an absolute and blind obedience, is to destroy liberty of conscience, and reason also."
John Trapp, 17th Century Puritan on Ex. 21:22 -
"There is a time, then, when the embryo is not alive; therefore the soul is not begotten, but infused after a time by God."
Adam Clarke, 19th century Methodist on Ex. 21:22 -
"But if mischief followed, that is, if the child had been fully formed, and was killed by this means, or the woman lost her life in consequence, then the punishment was as in other cases of murder-the person was put to death."
The Greek Septuagint translation often used by Jesus and the Apostles -
"And if two men strive and smite a woman with child, and her child be born imperfectly formed, he shall be forced to pay a penalty: as the woman's husband may lay upon him, he shall pay with a valuation. But if it be perfectly formed, he shall give life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, burning for burning, wound for wound, stripe for stripe." (Exod 21:22-25 LXXE)
The NASB, 1977 Edition -
“And if men struggle with each other and strike a woman with child so that she has a miscarriage, yet there is no further injury, he shall surely be fined as the woman’s husband may demand of him; and he shall pay as the judges decide. But if there is any further injury, then you shall appoint as a penalty life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, burn for burn, wound for wound, bruise for bruise." Ex.21:22-25 NASB 1977
“When people who are fighting injure a pregnant woman so that there is a miscarriage and yet no further harm follows, the one responsible shall be fined what the woman’s husband demands, paying as much as the judges determine." (Exo 21:22 NRSVue)
"Miscarriage" is the "spontaneous expulsion of a human fetus before it is viable and especially between the 12th and 28th weeks of gestation". Merriam-Webster
VictoryinJesus
Well-Known Member
- Jan 26, 2017
- 10,560
- 8,409
- 113
- Faith
- Christian
- Country
- United States
So they “Christians” can appear as if they are oh so good for fighting and standing up for women’s health? When actually they stand for the opposite of women’s long term mental health.
Instead they stand up and fight (vote) for women’s mental health decline…for women to have a lifetime of regret later, especially when they draw closer to God. They fight for women to suffer mental damage, great loss, and a brokenness where having an abortion will wound and scar the majority of those women spiritually and mentally even if they don’t see it yet. It would be like fighting for the right of a cutter who takes blades to cut themselves to self soothe. It looks like caring in fighting and standing up for that persons rights to do what they want with their body, but it’s fighting for their on-going self harm. That is just my opinion. I had an abortion when I was young. I was blind and stupid. If someone wanted to fight for my women’s rights I wish they had fought against my self harm. I’m not leaving the babies out of it, but I do think it begins with helping the moms by prevention of the harm they don’t see they are inflicting which later in life, will hit them hard. Most never stay in the same place but later change their mind. In helping those mothers to not suffer a mental health crisis later, it is helping the babies. Because it’s the loss of 60 million infants that will leave a mental health crisis in the minds of the women in the future.
My daughter asked me a good question once. She asked why protesters stand at the side where moms come out after the abortion shouting how horrible abortion is afterwards. Instead why don’t they stand on the side of the mom going in …to help her first. I’m not dismissing the babies. But instead of the focus being on the babies loss…In my opinion the focus should be first fighting for women’s health…. Fighting against the damage women’s health (mentally, spiritually and physically) will experience from the termination of 60 million babies. That will be 60 million women impacted for the rest of their life where there will be massive damage to their well being. Maybe if women met protestor taking a stand for the future mental health from self harming ….since they are self focused in that moment they may wake up to its their future the voters supporting abortion don’t care about. If protestor took a stand against a woman’s mental health crisis what could the supporters of abortion say …could they protest there will be no regret? Has there been studies on what mental damage women experience in the future from an abortion?
Again, I’m not downplaying it by taking the focus off the babies but instead shining a light I think on the loss of those babies will be significant…not keeping those babies leaving behind a wake of damage that will span across and throughout 60 million women’s lives. Pro abortion can’t argue that, I don’t think. That is a huge blow. To me that shows instead how valuable the babies are in what the loss of them will be. The result of the loss of them will be for years to come. We may say “nah, those women won’t care.” Maybe some won’t. But if only half of them regret it later and live a life of regret that is still a lot of mental health decline. See, supporters say they fight for the women. But do they fight for her mental health? Or is her mental health not even on their radar? It’s deceptive and people buy it up that pro abortion is for the women. It’s not. Pro abortion must think it’s a victory. They must think after the woman has been given the rights to abort, then it’s finished. That was a victory. But (Imo) that is only the beginning…and after that abortion comes the damage. Christians should know that is no victory for the damage to come. Christian’s should know no life taken before it’s time is without consequences.
Last edited:
If those that kill babies were to make it to heaven they would get to meet those they killed and get to tell them why their lives were counted as nothing.
Similar threads
