Did Biden Actually Say This?
- Thread starter April_Rose
- Start date
-
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
aspen
“"The harvest is plentiful but the workers are few
mocking and scoffing will get you nowhere, neither will reframing what I believe - hard to believe you are old enough to know better, but here we are....
aspen
“"The harvest is plentiful but the workers are few
absolutely! It is also inflammatory and indecent, the manner in which he has willfully misrepresented my POV
aspen
“"The harvest is plentiful but the workers are few
Hopefully, President Biden will appoint Hillary as his AG quickly, so she can lock Trump up.....oh the irony
Grailhunter
Well-Known Member
That is your problem you consider truth as mocking and scoffing. Again BLM rioters screaming in people's face when they try to reason with them.
So tells us how your age has added to your wisdom...there are just a few questions....I dare ya! Lets see your POV!
What is your position on abortion?
Your position on homosexuality?
Your position on gay marriage?
Your position on drug use?
Your position on the leftist form of communism? You can call it socialism if it make you feel better.
Your position on law and order?
Your position on law enforcement?
Your position on the rioters in the democratic run cities?
Your position on shutting down churches in democratic run states?
Your position on school prayer?
Your position on our schools teaching our children to be communists and atheists?
Your position on Christian monuments?
Your position on illegal aliens and secure borders?
Grailhunter
Well-Known Member
Seven of Nine
Well-Known Member
I don't think Biden or Hillary Clinton will have an opportunity to lock up Trump, but I concede that it's possible. Trump has legal trouble coming out of his ears, from his 3,500 lawsuits and 169 federal lawsuits he's named in to the federal charges looming over his head that Robert Mueller said he could still be charged with once he is out of office. Not to mention the criminal charges New York State has waiting in the wings for him.
aspen
“"The harvest is plentiful but the workers are few
aspen
“"The harvest is plentiful but the workers are few
oh boy! A new homework assignment from my teacher who has everything to teach and nothing to learn!
I think we are done here, GrailHunter - go find another pigeon to pluck
aspen
“"The harvest is plentiful but the workers are few
Grailhunter
Well-Known Member
Seven of Nine
Well-Known Member
The tide continues to steadily turn against Trump.
The Lincoln Project
Republicans Voting Against Trump
Finally, Christians are turning against Donald Trump
'Record-breaking group' of faith leaders endorses Biden
Evangelical Vote, Once Solid For Trump, Shows Fractures
We are evangelical Christians not voting for Donald Trump this time
Evangelical couple: 'our conscience won't allow us to vote for Trump again'
Faith leaders back Biden in sign that evangelical support for Trump is waning
500 Faith Leaders Endorse Joe Biden And Kamala Harris For The White House
More than 350 faith leaders to back Biden for president, including many first-time endorsers
Bobby Jo
Well-Known Member
Don't know if you noticed, but the "tide" has NEVER BEEN with Trump. It's only been with the Deep State, the Dishonest Media, and the Defenders of Corruption!
Oh, yeah, and apparently YOU'RE in there somewhere.
Bobby Jo
aspen
“"The harvest is plentiful but the workers are few
Taken
Well-Known Member
Taken
Well-Known Member
How the heck does he plan to earn votes then!? Seriously!! First he praises his opposition and now this? He might be over a hundred and eighty years old but I think that even I have a higher IQ than him.
Precisely.
Taken
Well-Known Member
Court Packing-
is what has Made the Supreme Court a disgraceful and detriment to the American People!
Observe WHO Democrats nominate for Justice Positions-
The well perpetuated Government Reps and News-outlets Neverending story of Dividing and Encouraging Division Among:
Race, Gender, Age, Gender identity, Sanctity of Life.
And? What exactly IS EVERY Single Justice Supposed to RULE a Case ON?
The "LIMITS OF LAW".
And what DO we See Instead?
Packing the Court...with People Who decide cases on their PERSONAL....OPINIONS...
ON Race, Gender, Age, Gender identity, Sanctity (and lack thereof).
What does the Court Render?
THEIR OPINION!
The "Supreme Court" was designed to Reign Supreme- Deciding Cases According TO the LAW
1) NOT others OPINIONS before them.
2) NOT personal emotional feelings and Opinions.
•••But the LAW
And
If A Law doesn't exist to decide a Case?
...nothing to render.
if the LAW is Vague?
...it is supposed to be Repealed being Void for Vagueness.
And Instead...Discussions and Opinion votes.
Barring a LAW is NOT Vague...IMO- every Justice in that position, Should All be in concert, all voting pursuant to the LAW, and NOT their "personal feelings and opinions".
It is a well known fact- Conservatives are (as History has revealed) - more Prone to stick to the letter of the Law...
And Democrats- are more Prone to consider Personal Feelings and Personal Opinions.
is what has Made the Supreme Court a disgraceful and detriment to the American People!
Observe WHO Democrats nominate for Justice Positions-
The well perpetuated Government Reps and News-outlets Neverending story of Dividing and Encouraging Division Among:
Race, Gender, Age, Gender identity, Sanctity of Life.
And? What exactly IS EVERY Single Justice Supposed to RULE a Case ON?
The "LIMITS OF LAW".
And what DO we See Instead?
Packing the Court...with People Who decide cases on their PERSONAL....OPINIONS...
ON Race, Gender, Age, Gender identity, Sanctity (and lack thereof).
What does the Court Render?
THEIR OPINION!
The "Supreme Court" was designed to Reign Supreme- Deciding Cases According TO the LAW
1) NOT others OPINIONS before them.
2) NOT personal emotional feelings and Opinions.
•••But the LAW
And
If A Law doesn't exist to decide a Case?
...nothing to render.
if the LAW is Vague?
...it is supposed to be Repealed being Void for Vagueness.
And Instead...Discussions and Opinion votes.
Barring a LAW is NOT Vague...IMO- every Justice in that position, Should All be in concert, all voting pursuant to the LAW, and NOT their "personal feelings and opinions".
It is a well known fact- Conservatives are (as History has revealed) - more Prone to stick to the letter of the Law...
And Democrats- are more Prone to consider Personal Feelings and Personal Opinions.
Similar threads
