Wrangler
Well-Known Member
Hmmm, no. Don't confuse WHAT people worship with HOW they worship.Calling it sacred, and declaring it a replacement for the sabbath is.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Hmmm, no. Don't confuse WHAT people worship with HOW they worship.Calling it sacred, and declaring it a replacement for the sabbath is.
While you and I may differ by a few decades, I think I said essentially this in Post #52. Assigning Constantine "nothing to do" with establishing Sunday as the Lord's Day is a bit strong, but your chronological point is well taken.
Still, I have to agree with Aunty Jane that Sun God symbolism has infiltrated a bit. She ties that to the Lord's Day origin, while I think it is a later adornment.
But she and I were having a civil discussion on it, not calling each other "liar," I'm convinced your use of the word s too harsh ere. a "Liar" KNOWS he or she is spewing untruths. Unless you are a mind reader, your accusation is faulty.
God's Word is what points it out, you must choose which to follow..
I liked this part of your post. The rest seemed to go off topic.We do. The below verse is about as plain as it gets. Colossians 2:16 New International Version
16 Therefore do not let anyone judge you by what you eat or drink, or with regard to a religious festival, a New Moon celebration or a Sabbath day.
But if that verse is not enough there are others. Such as the entire Chapter of Acts 15, the fact that the Sabbath was given to the Jews as part of the Mosaic covenant and not to anyone else as the Jews themselves testify. We are told in the book of James 2:10 KJV: "For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all." This is why we have a new covenant rather than selective OT law keeping.
In Latin, not in Greek. Not in Syriac. Not in Coptic. What's your point?Keeping in mind that no matter what day of week was pick, it would still represent a pagan god because all of the days of the week are named after pagan gods.
What my nation (and yours) calls the days of the week, and the months of the year were set by Pope Gregory in the 16th century....he was a counterfeit “Christian” leader of an apostate church. Not our call, Wrangler....we are “no part of the world” so we have no say in what the world wants to call anything.I think you are in denial. Your nation calls the 1st day of the week Sunday, don't they?
“Partnering”? How do you reconcile 2 Cor 6:14-18...?"Partnering" means something other than recognizing the culture that you are in. Gross misapplication of Scripture.
Well that’s an interesting take on that scripture seeing as how it is also from Paul.Yes. I think God approves. 1 Corinthians 9:19-23.
That is not the issue and you know it.....you are shifting the goalposts.Wrangler said:You're ridiculous! It is NO kind of religious practice to recognize the language in the culture I'm from uses a certain word for the 1st day of the week!
Is it what matters to humans that counts? Isn’t what matters to God more important than doing what he forbids because it feels good?While you and I love history must don't know and don't care. What matters to them is now and now Christ was always part of Christmas - even though that date was originally celebrated for a different reason from the culture the establishment of Christmas came from.
Go back to the first century and understand that this is exactly what it means.....the Gentiles who came to Christ had to put away every vestige of their former religion and its practices...and implement what Christ instructed them to do. A complete divorce from their culture and the adoption of a new one was required.You joylessly write as though to be a Christian means to be divorced from the culture around you.
Are you serious? Can you not see that today’s children don’t see Christ in Christmas, any more than they see him in Easter celebrations. All they see is Santa Claus, presents and favourite foods......and Easter bunnies delivering chocolate eggs. All the pagan stuff is still there, but Christ is missing because he was never in those celebrations to begin with.It is a great joy for kids to get gifts on Christmas and candy on Easter. Somehow, you rationalize this joyous celebration is sinful. This is not of the Spirit. Gal 5:18-21.
Not exactly sure of your point.In Latin, not in Greek. Not in Syriac. Not in Coptic. What's your point?
When one deliberately alters the word of God, even a commandment, and replaces it with something of their own devising, they are placing their own authority above God's authority. How is that not a transgression against the 1st and 2nd commandment?Hmmm, no. Don't confuse WHAT people worship with HOW they worship.
The Babylonians were the first to divide the year into 7 day weeks? Interesting. I suppose then that makes the sabbath a Babylonian celebration?They divided the year into seven-day weeks to track the phases of the moon
LOLThe Babylonians were the first to divide the year into 7 day weeks? Interesting. I suppose then that makes the sabbath a Babylonian celebration?
I would suggest somewhat more than different. How about original?LOL
Of course the Jewish dating system is different.
Definitely the original dating system in the Old TestamentI would suggest somewhat more than different. How about original?
Nisan (March-April)Definitely the original dating system in the Old Testament
I'm not really following this discussion between you two re the the Sabbath/-sFurther to the above discussion, Moses wrote all the history of the patriarchs. Nothing was written by Abraham, Isaac, or anyone before them, until Moses. So no-one mentioned in genesis recorded any of the history up till the time of the exodus. Also, I think it reasonable to assume that Moses didn't commit anything to writing until after Sinai. What he recorded first were the words and instructions of the law (Deut...Levit... etc) as written on parchment and placed in the side of the ark. Yet that wasn't the first. The first thing actually recorded and given were the tables of the Covenant, the Ten Commandments, written by God Himself with His own finger on the stone. And in the middle of that law was the sabbath commandment, revealing the origin of the week being not of the Jews, nor the Babylonians, but God Himself, when He said,
“8 Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy. 9 Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work: 10 But the seventh day is the sabbath of the LORD thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates: 11 For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it. ”
Exodus 20:8-11 KJV
Right there in God's own words, He declared the origin of the week.
Some cultures named week days after gods. Some did not. Why did you bring it up in our discussion of the Lord's Day origins?Not exactly sure of your point.
The Babylonians are thought to have been the first to name the days of the week around 12th century BC. They divided the year into seven-day weeks to track the phases of the moon, and named the days after the seven celestial bodies they could see in the sky: the Sun, Moon, Mars, Venus, Mercury, Saturn, and Jupiter.
The Babylonians' system was later adopted by the Romans, who used it for centuries in their civil practices. In 321 CE, Emperor Constantine established the seven-day week in the Roman calendar, making Sunday the first day and designating it a day of rest and worship. The other days were named after the celestial bodies, with the exception of Monday, which was called "Moon's-day".
The names of the days of the week have varied across cultures and civilizations over time. For example, the Greeks named the days after their gods, and the Romans replaced the Greek names with their own gods. The Anglo-Saxons then replaced the Roman names with their own gods, and some of these names are still used in English today:
Thursday: Comes from the Old English word Þūnresdæg, which is named after Thor, the Norse god of thunder, strength, and protection
Friday: Comes from the Old English word Frīgedæg, which may be named after Frigg, the Norse goddess of love and the heavens, or Freya, the Teutonic goddess of love and beauty
Monday: Comes from the Anglo-Saxon word Mōnandæg, which means "the moon's day"
I liked this part of your post. The rest seemed to go off topic.
Wider sense? This thread is about Catholics not SDA, right?Off topic in the strict sense, but not in the wider sense.
More denial. We, with a soul, are part of and in this world. What Does it Mean to Be in the World but Not of the World? (John 17:16)Not our call, Wrangler....we are “no part of the world” so we have no say in what the world wants to call anything.