ChurchAuthority
New Member
- May 10, 2013
- 153
- 2
- 0
- 61
Here you are arguing my point! Then what is with all the ranting about the primacy of Rome (a physical place)? What is that all about! I do know what I'm talking about or else I would have let you continue to distort the truth! Are you then standing up for the "mystical" Rome rather than an earthly place called Rome. Do you know what you believe? Why this emphasis on an earthly seat of power?Episkopos said:Are you arguing over the sharpness of head gear here? Clothing doesn't actually make the man.I don't call people who simply disagree with the Catholic Church, "Anti-Catholic".
I reserve that moniker for those who lie about what the Church teaches, revise history and sling repugnant names at us - like that pointy hat slur you just made.
As for the Council of Jerusalem in Acts 15 - you have no idea what you're talking about. The PLACE had nothing to do with the Authority that was displayed there - just as the physical location of Rome has nothing to do with the Church's God-given authority now. The fact is that Peter and the rest of the apostles had the Authority given them by Jesus. This is not earthly Authority. Jesus told them that WHATEVER the Church ordained on earth would be ordained in Heaven (Matt. 16:18-19, 18:15-18, Luke 10:16, John 20:21-23).
.The Apostles, under the guidance of the Holy Spirit made the decision to not expect the Gentiles to conform to Jewish Law because the Holy spirit was to guide the Church to ALL truth - just as Jesus told them in John 16:12-15.
So much for your absurd claims about "earthly" authority . .
So much for your notion of the primacy of earthly Rome.
Your failure here is one of CONTEXT.
The city of Rome is not what is important. It is the CHURCH at Rome that has Primacy - NOT Rome itself. It has Primacy because the bishop of Rome is the Successor to Peter, who had God-given Primacy over the Apostles and the Church (Matt. 16:18-19, Luke 22:32, John 21:15-19). This doesn't get any simpler.
Amazing . . .