Search results

One of the most objectionable aspects of Jesuit Futurism is the fact that there's always activity going on down here on Earth. What about Isaiah 24? What about Jeremiah 25? What about 2 Peter 2? Jesuit Futurism consistently fails to account for these passages and others which clearly teach a...

Revelation isn't written in chronological order. It employs Greek chiasms, parallelisms, synchysis, etc... ...which is why John describes New Jerusalem descending in chapter 21 after he says the wicked go up and surround already descended New Jerusalem in chapter 20. So, yes, New Jerusalem...

See, this is where you go off the rails, friend. There is no mention of a "fifth kingdom" - only "divisions" of the fourth into ten separate barbarian tribes - the Ten Horns - which bitterly fought for decades until they voted to appoint the Bishop of Rome - the Little Horn which arose among...

The only Messianic event that took place 483 years after the 457 B.C. decree of Artaxerxes was the 27 A.D. baptism of Jesus when He was anointed by the Holy Spirit which descended upon Him like a dove. His baptism closed the 69 Weeks and commenced the 70th Week. That's why He preached "the...

Yes, He descends but only to cloud elevation, after which He circles the Earth across the sky collecting the saints "as light cometh out of the East and shineth even to the West". It doesn't say, "as lightning striketh the ground". That's not the Second Coming - that's when New Jerusalem...

Doesn't "messiah" mean "anointed"? When was Jesus "anointed"? The Triumphal Entry? Or, in the Jordan? It says "in the midst of the week He shall cause the sacrifice and oblation to cease" --- which happened when He was "cut off". Look up the Hebrew "chatak" which means "amputate",.

"Unto Messiah the Prince" refers to His baptism - not the "triumphal entry". Artaxerxes Longimanus' 444 B.C. is not the "commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem" - it's merely authorization for the provision of timber. Only decree comprehensive enough to fulfill Daniel 9:25 KJV is the...

Jesus doesn't descend anywhere at the Second Coming. We go up to meet Him in the air. It is after the 1,000 years that New Jerusalem relocates to Earth with Jesus and the saints who went up to meet Him in the air 1,000 years earlier. Then, the wicked resurrect, are judged, sentenced, and...

He's absolutely cut off after 69 1/2: "street/wall shall be built" = 7 Weeks "after threescore and two" = 62 Weeks These two verses together allow for only one conclusion: the Cross was "after" the 69 which is "during" the 70th - the middle of it. The word "midst" means "middle" - not...

During the 70th Week (27 A.D - 34 A.D.), Jesus confirmed the new covenant of salvation for 7 years, first in Person for 3 1/2 years and then "by them that heard Him" for the remaining 3 1/2 years. The prophecy was fulfilled exactly right on time for exactly the duration prophesied: 490 years...

Protestant Historicism arose centuries before the organization of the SDA church, friend. Actually: In the 2nd Coming, Jesus sweeps over Earth, collecting the dead/living saints, leaving behind destruction. They depart to heaven for 1,000 years, while the wicked drop dead and sleep, and Satan...

And, the "man of God" who's "perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works" refers to just one man. Got it. No where does it say Antichrist will be "king of Israel" because God would never refer to a building in which the sacrifices therein would be a collective, national middle finger in...

Yes, obviously, the "day of Christ" aka "day of the Lord" aka "thief in the night" aka "Second Coming" happens after the "falling away" apostasy authored by the papacy aka "man of sin". The word is "apostasia" from which we get "apostasy" - not some "catching away into the air" nonsense. When...

My friend, why criticize me for using "Jesuit Futurist" when that's exactly where your ideas originated? I'm sure you're aware Jesuit Futurism claims the "raptura" (translated from the Greek "apostasia") refers to a "falling away" which the Jesuits claim refers to "the church falling away from...

Great...so you believe the belly & thighs of brass/four winged leopard are Greece......and the legs of iron/beast with iron teeth and brass nails are Rome? Do you agree that as soon as Babylon fell, MP rose and when MP fell, Greece arose and when Greece (the whole comprised of four parts) fell...

Truth always compels defense of the lie, right? Are we limiting the discussion to "terms" or "ideas"? Because the "ideas" of the ECFs are in line with what we call "Protestant Historicism" and opposed to Jesuit Futurism. It's impossible to get "bogged down" in the truth. The Bible is so clear...

You telling me you're not aware the ancients feared to even speak under their breath about the fall of the kingdom ruling over them? That even the slightest minutia of suspicion was enough to have one's height lowered precisely by the size of his head? You think they said, "O, king, live...

See, the difference is your interpretation is subjective based purely on opinion - mine is objective based on historical evidence: Hear England's greatest prophecy teacher, H. Grattan Guinness: "The Fathers held that the Roman empire was the ”let” or "hindrance" (or "restrainer"), referred to...

You agree the silver chest/arms and the lopsided bear are MP?

Oh, so now the testimony of the ECFs is a conspiracy? For the same reason He didn't want Christ to "fall into the wrong hands" when He told Joseph to take Mary and Jesus down to Egypt - the end of Christianity. They make perfect sense to anyone not seduced by Jesuit Futurism, and to anyone...