Search results

I am not attempting to justify a lawless society via the fact that scripture posits the eye for an eye mode of human conduct; I am indeed advocating the employment of the ancient notion of reciprocity within misconduct, at the interpersonal level, for the sake of upholding personal freedom of...

This truth thing can seldom be indubitably established for we invariably err. You might not be being untruthful, merely always mistaken...

No, now why do you insist on constantly attempting to deprecate my person, while, all the while, I am perfection!? It is not me but rather my reasoned position you ought to attempt to critique, but, you are unable to because there is nothing lacking therein...

I most certainly am super/superior as per IQ testing, wherein I was determined to have a variable intelligence quotient in the superior range, meaning that somedays I am dumber, some smarter! Funny huh?

What I am doing is proposing the most radical possible scenario in order that some compromise might be attained wherein law is not as absolute, intrusive, and peon-generative; and, said mid-point between absolutism and total freedom would be characterized by everyone being reflectively free...

Now imbecilic flippancy upsurges uselessly poking silly nonsensical and radically rude fun.

Heart2Soul; I posted on this particular Christian site because I have some past familiarity with the site, and, since I am essentially proposing an alternate approach to civilization, other than civilization-via-law. Christians purport to be living an alternate non-law approach to human...

I did not make a big deal out of it; I simply honestly admitted I did not know what you were referring to. I guess all you can possibly engage in is senseless criticism of my person, lacking the wherewithal to engage in toughminded dialectic regarding the challenge I have issued to American...

I am indubitably a superior intellect; a superman. I am not being inadvertently condescending. I am simply authentically superior...

It is not necessary for you to repeatedly insult my intelligence, and it would be preferable for you just to get off my back. I do not need any help from you. So I had no idea what you meant by your signature, so what!? And, the quality of my sapientality has noting to do with it. You are an...

Amadeus; A tremendous number of Christian ministers have PhD's in Theology and/or philosophy. Clearly I am addressing the most highly educated persons among Christians. My introductory paragraph is somewhat complex; however, the body of the essay is relatively uncomplicated and straightforward...

Helen; I am not speaking to my neighbors or to my grocery store; I am addressing the world regarding future possibilities concerning what we humans think we are accomplishing with law. Okay, fine, so, according to you I have not communicated to you personally concerning my subject matter; have...

What is your SIGNATURE? You imply I do not understand how to communicate and then leave me in the lurch regarding something you are speaking of as your signature?! I will read your signature if and when I figure out what/where it is...

Willie T, It is surely written in English; an ilk of radically complex English whereby human existence is discussed within Existential Phenomenology; an ilk of English which I know I ought write in for the sake of forever expressing my thought in the highest possible way. If one finds something...

The viability of law as a motivational force exercised on a basis of punishment, purportedly efficient to make and maintain decent civil interpersonal conduct, is questionable in terms of the incorrectness of scholars of jurisprudence in regard to a supposedly conduct-originative law...

Enoch111; Nothing has ''hit home'' here other than the total unacceptability of your vain and useless attempt to stifle the free expression and interchange of divers perspectival views via this excellent forum. You unwittingly witness against your own "belief" in Christ, for, when you state...

Further reference Enoch111's earlier post regarding Blue Green Earth's brilliant treatise appearing in this Christian Apologetics Forum, wherein Enoch111 attempts to drive Blue Green off the forum, to which I said, and now, again, say: The radically beautifully constructed metered mode of...

The radically beautifully constructed metered mode of sentence structure whereby the author of the resurrection claims essay articulates his several proposals, exhibits his rationally superior sapientality as infinitely abundantly rich and godlike, while the backward ignorant and intolerant...

It was ScottA that got put back on ignore for calling me horrid names. Yea, fine, your entire linguistic structure has totally changed since you encountered me. You and ScottA are more ill-behaved/unmannered than the Atheists who were so totally horrid. I dreaded the prospect of viewing this...

You are on ignore forever now...you just cannot, will not, play nice.