Search results

Lol. Because I am dealing with people like you who constantly explain the way the truth.

So?

Exactly. To de-program that would take more time and effort than what we could expend on these forums. Sometimes people just want to believe error. The same guy denies the deity of Christ. He should not be allowed on a Christian forum.

Your fight is with Scripture, not Amils. You have no answer for the Book.

There is zero mention of your supposed future millennium. You know that. All you can do with text after text, is force it into the sacred text. That just about sums up Premil. I notice you never address Amil posts. You just divert with your own extra-biblical avoidance. The key of David...

No. That's what you would like it to say. The text speaks for itself. It forbids your position.

How can there be a prolonged period of time after the last or final day? How can there be a prolonged period of time after time (or chronos) shall be no longer? How can there be an age in-between this age and the age to come when Scripture only recognizes a 2-age framework?

You and your Pretrib assailants can never attack anyone about this. You are masters at it. Spiritual Israelite has been trying in vain to get you to address the multiple holes in your theology, without success. It is time to cough up or shut up.

It seems like they want to assume the opposite position to everything Scripture is teaching. I mean it! I have never seem so many of them exposing themselves at the one time.

Why are we even having to fight such battles? This is so obvious.

Your false teaching forces you to butcher much Scripture. Are not convicted by the Holy Spirit about this?

How can an open, honest and objective Bible student deny this? They couldn't. The evidence is overwhelming.

After Calvary, the elect followed Jesus in spirit to paradise. You have yet to present one single Scripture that teaches Hades is or was paradise. All we have are your opinions.

To arrive at the ‘corporate position’ one has to totally ignore Paul’s overriding message of two types of Israeli in Romans 9–11 (and in the whole book of Romans). Throughout, he is constantly differentiating between Israelis that are blind and Israelis that are elect. One also has to ignore the...

The reason why Premils have avoided this is because it demolishes their thesis. Their doctrine is dead on this forum. It just needs a decent burial. I would add Revelation 11:15: "And the seventh angel sounded; and there were great voices in heaven, saying, The kingdoms of this world are...

We see Stephen addressing Isaiah 66:1, whilst preaching on the subject of the tabernacle in Acts 7:44-50, saying, “Our fathers had the tabernacle of witness in the wilderness, as he had appointed, speaking unto Moses, that he should make it according to the fashion that he had seen. Which also...

Premils do not seem to know what it means to be "in Christ." They do not know who that applies to. No wonder their theology is messed up.

It says all flesh are destroyed. Hello! Premils prove time after time that they do not take Scripture literal. They literalize the spiritual language and spiritualize the literal language. There are 2 camps in Revelation (as elsewhere in Scripture) - 2 armies, saved and lost.

The text couldn't be clearer: "of the fruit of his loins, according to the flesh, he would raise up Christ to sit on his throne [referring to Psalms 132:12]; he seeing this before spake of the resurrection of Christ." Sorry for bursting your bubble, but, this doesn't allow for any Premil...

What you quote as evidence for your imaginary future kingdom is just a mere question from the disciples. That is it! For the record, the disciples said a lot and asked a lot that was fool-hearty that Jesus had to correct or rebuke. He did so here. But you totally reject His teaching. You defer...