Search results

That is us! The Apostle declares in Romans 2:25-29: “For circumcision verily profiteth, if thou keep the law: but if thou be a breaker of the law, thy circumcision is made uncircumcision. Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted...

But the nations were instructed to keep the commands of Christ like the Jews.

Sadly, this totally sums up your theology. You exhort us to compare Scripture with Scripture yet you admit you have no Scripture that teaches your error. So there is no Scripture to support Scripture with because as you admit it is all your opinions. All we have is your personal imaginations...

You are! A lot!

This is total nonsense! It is time to get real. Seriously. It is hard to take your posts serious.

1 Peter 2:9-10 declares, whilst addressing the New Testament Church of Jesus Christ, “ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light. Which in time past...

Every time your error is exposed you duck around the evidence. Spiritual Israelite quoted 1 John 5:1-5: “Whosoever believeth that Jesus is the Christ is born of God: and every one that loveth him that begat loveth him also that is begotten of him. By this we know that we love the children of...

You should write your own Bible. You seem to have such an issue with the real one.

Romans 11:26, “all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob.” Paul makes a slight alteration to Isaiah’s prophecy in order to show the fulfilment of this glorious prophecy. Instead of saying that the Redeemer...

There is no Scripture that can persuade him from his error. He sidesteps or rejects every passage presented to him. His rebuttal is his own imaginations.

Stop spreading a false gospel. You are fighting the Book. It is the greatest enemy of your false teaching.

He seems to want to live in the defeat and death of the old covenant. He cannot see the victory of the New Covenant

By your failure to bring any relevant biblical evidence to the table you are admitting you have nothing. What you present was before the cross. You know that! Something happened 2000 years ago where Hades was conquered. Read Rev 1:18: "I am he that liveth, and was dead; and, behold, I am alive...

Like Scripture, what they attribute to history and what is reality are day and night.

There is nothing he writes can be trusted. It is clear he has never studied the subject. He is way out of his depth. He makes it up as he goes. He has zero historic evidence.

Hebrews 12:18 supports this contention, saying, “For ye are not come [plural perfect active indicative] unto the mount that might be touched, and that burned with fire, nor unto blackness, and darkness, and tempest.” Hebrews 12:22 says, “But ye are come [plural perfect active indicative] unto...

Why do you avoid the Amil rebuttals? Because you have no sensible refutation. That is because the Amil case is watertight.

Exactly. All he has is petty name-calling and avoidance. This has become the Premil MO online for 2 decades. We should count this a compliment. The battle has been long-won.

LOL. In your dreams!

That is all you have - noise. Your theology lacks biblical support.