Search results

I am addressing this from the viewpoint of one who holds to a Calvinist Baptist framework on salvation now

Eternal Security is a valid biblical doctrine, as it depends upon the Trinity to save and keep us, not ourselves!

Jesus died and paid the sin debt for ALL sins ever committed by the redeemed, not just prior ones, and then not put on a probationary period to see if we "earned it"

There is eternal security in Christ for the redeemed of the Lord

Those who hold to a biblical view of OSAS would not see it as being saved to keep on sinning still now!

None save Jesus ever practiced a "sinless perfection state"

Jesus was born under the Law, and he was ONLY one ever to keep the Sabbath as God intended, but under the new Covenant, we are no longer under jewish sabbath obligation!

The redeemed of the Lord are called to be as jesus was in this life, and while we yet still sin, we have the bent towards holiness now within us, so no way a saved can live in and enjoy sinning life did before saved!

Mormons hold to there being 3 gods, while we hold to there being just One... We hold that God was eternally God, Mormons that he evolved into being God, as all good and faithful mormons males have that opportunity also!

Read the work from Desmond Ford in regards to the Investigative Judgement heresy, as he should beyond a doubt not derived from the scriptures!

Hypers see the Church basically only having the letters of Paul as for us today!

Just youtube search under Al Fadi and check out muslim videos!

Only 15% arab Muslims know the Quran, so Allah inspired His final revelation to a Prophet who could not read nor write, and in a language few among even Muslims can read!

There does seem to be a moving by God among them as never before!

their language and theology was inherited from the people North, who were pagans, and the Quaran is basically a re borrowing of OT Apocrypha and NT Gnostic and sectarian literature!

The Muslims have always just accepted blindly that the Quran was eternal, and was never changed, but now historical facts causing them division and doubt! Their Book is just getting now the very treatment our Bible did past 200 years in regards to textual and historical criticism!

Think that the real debate is now in their camp, between western Muslims who have known for years issues and problems in the history of the Quaran, and Middle east Muslims who just accept its the eternal word of Allah period!

Muslims claim was inerrant and complete 652 AD, but there are NONE found at all before 705, and those were incomplete!

We now can prove from historical accounts that Muhammed did not write ANY of it, and that the Quran was not in the final real form until 300 years after he died!

best source is on the Cira website, and one by Dr Jay Smith!