Search results

Already answered it. You alluded to a meal you haven't tasted three times now. Thanks for your time, Stranger.

I cannot judge the same until I have been judged. I see no one qualified to judge either of us around here, on such a dehumanized and expressionless platform as this be, I hope you find your way home.

You did clearly say " he saw the risen christ" but he (Paul): A: describes light as the physical manifestation of what he saw. B: hears a voice that "say's" it is Jesus which is not the same as "looking directly at Jesus" hence he heard not saw. C: It fits the descriptive warning perfectly that...

No. What you have offered is Paul using his own witness testimony of 1 to somehow "prove" it was Jesus, that is called faith, proof is based on "evidence" yet Jesus clearly states you need the witness testimony of 2 or more AND you ignore Jesus own words in Matthew to warn you of who would come...

So why did you tell me he did? #297 You also have not attempted to give Paul the witness testimony of 2 or more regarding acceptance from the other 11 (which you used his own single witness testimony so that according to Jesus instructions falls short...).

Jesus warned in his talk to the apostles at the Mount of Olives that after He ascends to heaven, many imposters will come in his name saying they are Himself, but do not believe them if someone claims to have seen Him return from heaven just in a wilderness place or in a private room. Jesus says...

Nope. You now have to twist scripture... You said "he saw" Now you are saying he heard a voice "say" Show me Paul describe Jesus in the flesh if he did as you say...see him. Better still quote the event (all of it). Thanks

Jesus is not repugnant. I would take that back quick. Again you alluded to a meal you havent tasted. Once more...

I asked are you sure.... that Paul actually SAW JESUS risen. You said he did. I thought Paul alludes to a bright light and only heard a voice?

You have already judged me stranger. According to you my soul is damned because in the grace of spirit through your righteousness you allude me to be. I just do not think that you (like all the others) feel I should "know" before I read. You allude to the meal before you have even tasted it...

Are you sure?

Like I have explained many many times, when I have read (and understand the meaning thereof) of ANY scripture I either do not fully understand at the present time, I can give you an honest answer. You can allude to the meal before you eat or to the service, you can allude even to some apparant...

Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the Lord thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity...

I do have some idea. To know Gods love for you and to show your love for him you have to have some understanding of cause and effect by your own and other peoples actions. I believe the 10 Commandments are THE ONLY WAY TO PROTECT. If you do not share the same appreciation for how the law can...

Where on planet earth..

You seem lost for giving any answer. Check Pauls negations of the same commandments, Jesus teaches you are required to keep the commandments to show your "love" of the father. Do you ignore the contradictions?

Can anyone shed some light on where it originates from? Why it was chosen for this forum or what criteria was used to make the choice? Everything happens for a reason. Thanks.

Jesus taught the commandments, taught that having love for the father was keeping his commands.... Last time I checked Paul says it is ok to eat anything because nothing is unclean, or eat meat that has been sacrificed to strange/foreign gods, he said it was ok to lie to people to gain their...

I have Jesus. I do not need Paul for salvation. What part of that are you struggling with?

I guess we have no LAW to protect us from this kind of abomination? To bad. Trannies must be under Pauls grace too!