Search results

Please consider.... 1) The phrase “a thousand years” appears six times in Revelation 20:2–7. That’s unusually repetitive for such a short passage, which suggests deliberate emphasis. If the Holy Spirit intended the number to be symbolic, He would not have repeated it six times without any...

Would you also please answer the question regarding the verse showing the 1000 years?

Please just try and answer the question.

Rv 20:4-5 which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years. But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first...

What does the following tell you? Rv 20:4-5 which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years. But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years...

What does the Scripture say.. simply read it.

Paul says in Acts 26:23—that Jesus was the first to rise from the dead. After all, Jesus is absolutely the firstborn from the dead (Colossians 1:18), the first fruits of those who will be raised to eternal life (1 Corinthians 15:20). His resurrection is the cornerstone of our faith and the...

Please read revelation 20:4-6 again. Does this not say " the souls...... " It is not discussing Jesus here as the first resurrection. What do you do with the reference / purpose for the 1000 year comment? What do you do with the reference / purpose for the "second resurrection? (the second...

John 5:28-29KJV 28 Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice, 29 And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation. This is true.... it...

So, you are saying the 1000 years is not literal because you cannot find a verse that speaks of a physical location? Is the time element a literal 1000 years but it is with the Lord - not on earth?

Would you mind letting me know what is telling you the 1000 years are not literal. I have not seen anything or might have completely missed it. Thanks.

Thanks for your response. Unless I am not understanding your comment, here is what I think I see within your response: There are two sets of people at the end of time - those that are dead at His coming that will be raised from the graves to be with Him for the 1000 years. Secondly, those that...

That is a great question / observation and one that I have been confused about for some time. I have only come up with one answer, and if you might comment on it or offer another that would be great to think about. If you notice I have numbered each of the steps or movements and have...

For what it is worth.... this is a cut out of the commentary on Revelation chapter11 - still in progess....All symbolic. If the 144,000 serve as the last earthly messengers of God’s truth, then they complete the mission of spreading the Gospel in the face of worldwide opposition. By looking...

For what it is worth.... 1. The Second Coming of Christ and the First Resurrection (the righteous dead) The dead in Christ will rise first, and those who are alive in the faith will be caught up together with them. Key verses: 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17 “For the Lord himself shall descend...

For what it is worth... The AOD represents the rejection and crucifixion of our Messiah by His people. This would, of course, have many consequences: 1) From a phyical or literal way, the Temple would no longer serve to house the presence of God. It had fulfilled its mission in pointing...

(John 16:5–16) 15If you love Me, you will keepe My commandments. 16And I will ask the Father, and He will give you another Advocatef to be with you forever— 17the Spirit of truth. The world cannot receive Him, because it neither sees Him nor knows Him. But you do know Him, for He abides with...

Would you like to remind me what is the comment / interpretation I mentioned that you see differently? We can briefly discuss it.... Thanks.

I think I see what you are saying. But the old covenant was comprised of three sections. We have the 10 commandments - which is the moral law of God. We have the religious laws which I believe might be the 603 laws of the 613, and finally, we have the ceremonial laws such as the animal...

Not to be arguementative at all, but perhaps i am not understanding what you might mean regarding the old covenant. If I were to use the definition of trhe Old Covenant as meaning the 10 commandments only, then I would have to say that it is quite still valid. If not, then which of the 10 have...