Search results

Ok I’m Mormon. Do I have a biblical worldview now? Or is your biblical worldview the only correct one?

Because human beings are limited to time and space. God is outside of time and space. If God is not beyond all understanding, then he is not God. You are diminishing God by claiming to know God. You’re objectifying an infinite being.

How do we know you’re not misusing the Bible? Are you telling me that -your- interpretation of the Bible is the one and correct one? Ok you’re a human person. How can a little, insignificant human confined to time and space have any clue about an infinite being that’s completely outside of it?

“The language of faith seeks truth in what is unknowable”. This is self-refuting. If it is unknowable, then it is completely beyond your grasp. You’re born in sin, you can’t distinguish lie from truth either. Remember what Jesus said, “Forgive them for they do not know what they do.” We’re all...

How can an infinite being make itself known to a limited being with a limited mind? If God made himself known, then it would be self-defeating because he would no longer be God. God is supposed to be beyond all understanding and time and space.

How do you know it’s absolutely a false premise? Are you God?

But if you have a God, then you are God because only God could know about God. God is outside of space and time, you are not. So if you claim to know God and have a God, then you are implying you are God. Someone who is born in sin cannot know God because they’re limited and mentally...

So drag queens coming into public schools is indoctrination, but telling children to follow Jesus or else they’ll burn is not?

The absolute certainty of Christians that God exists…seems like something only God himself would know because “Only God knows”. If only God is absolute, then only God can make an absolute statement. For a group of people that talks so much about being limited, and fallible, they sure are perfect...

They are only changed within the confines of science, a theory will replace another theory. They do not change in the way of becoming the Bible tomorrow and a textbook the next. Education is an ever changing process, religious belief is not…it is stagnant.

Science does not support the existence of God, let alone Santa Claus. There is 0 evidence of God. Scientists do not rely on religious dogma, they rely on the scientific method. And God being outside of space and time, making it impossible to fit inside of a test tube, is equivalent to a god...

The God particle is very different from the Christian God. Otherwise, scientists would call it the Christian God and not Higgs Boson.

Belief in God is completely faith-based, there is no direct evidence of God. Scientists don’t publicly refer to the universe as “God’s creation” and neither do textbooks.

I’m agnostic atheist as opposed to anti-theist. I like to think of science as more of a method that still existed unofficially before Christians. The Egyptians for example were pioneers in architecture and astronomy, they had to have used science in order to test a hypothesis to see what...

It is spitting in the face of science whenever a dishonest apologist claims that science was born out of Christianity or that science supports the existence of God. These people have no idea how science works, let alone know the scientific method. First off, God cannot be put into a test tube...

Oh so you admit science is diametrically opposed to faith? Waiting on Wrangler to back-peddle and come up with some disingenuous reply as to why science and faith are not different.

He doesn’t have an interpretation. His word, is the word of God because he is God and we must all kneel before his one & only correct view of the Bible.

Saying God is special unlike everything else is special pleading, it’s a fallacy. It’s like saying, “Yes, I do think that all drunk drivers should go to prison, but your honor, he is my son! He is a good boy who just made a mistake!” You also would have to prove that the first cause is even a...

The ‘First Cause’ commits the fallacy of special pleading. The ‘solution’ to the problem of the universe’s existence posited in this argument is that a god exists, which both exists and has no cause. God is created as a special exception to that universal rule. This is a logical fallacy known as...