Search results

Quote the verse in which "God isn't keeping His promise".

He awaits nothing. He delivers His Kingdom, which He established at His first coming, to His Father. 1 Corinthians 15 24 Then cometh the end, when he shall have delivered up the kingdom to God, even the Father; when he shall have put down all rule and all authority and power.

I said "multiple verses". Is that too difficult for you to understand? Your argument attempts to deny everything written by Peter about the subject in the chapter.

Where is He sitting now? Acts 2 29 Men and brethren, let me freely speak unto you of the patriarch David, that he is both dead and buried, and his sepulchre is with us unto this day. 30 Therefore being a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn with an oath to him, that of the fruit of his...

Ever heard of "?" Ever heard of "stupid"? Nah. :laughing:

David's literal physical throne was destroyed more than 2,000 years ago by Nebuchadnezzar. Christ will not be sitting on it. :laughing: You obviously believe that David's literal physical throne still exists. Why can't you tell us where it is? :laughing:

He's been seated on David's thone in the heavens since His Resurrection. Acts 2:29-35

Quote the verse(s) demonstrating Paul's "troubling perception that God has failed to uphold His promise to His chosen nation."

The gibberish is yours. You said there was no difference. :laughing:

I've been perfectly clear that "all Israel" and "of Israel" are two different groups within literal Israel.

It is full and complete, as whatever is "more than that" is incinerated. Nor is it a "remark". :laughing: It is the most detailed of multiple verses throughout the chapter which deal with the topic.

There's no difference between Jesus' resurrection and Jesus' Second Coming? :laughing:

2 Peter 3 10 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up. Whom to believe? You or Peter Need a hint...

Don't lecture me. Lecture Paul. It is he who identifies "all Israel" and "of Israel". Why does Paul have "great heaviness and continual sorrow" in his heart in Romans 9:2? If he believed your version of Israelitic salvation, he'd be beside himself with ecstasy. But he isn't. Because the...

Again, as always, If you have NT Scripture disproving what I've cited and explained, then please cite and explain yours.

Jesus' response to the disciples' question is instructive. He refers to times and seasons. Exegetically, times and seasons are associated with the day of the Lord, which is the final end of all things temporal. Paul clarifies it. 1 Thessalonians 5 1 But of the times and the seasons, brethren...

Yes, the believers and unbelievers of literal Israel.

The disciples evidently forgot or misunderstood this declaration by Christ to the chief priests and elders: Matthew 21 43 Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof. But there is no further reference in...

It refers to believing Israel ("all Israel") and unbelieving Israel ("of Israel"), both of which were existent when Paul wrote, have been existent ever since, and will be existent until Christ returns.

Two Israels. Romans 9 6 Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel: 7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called. 8 That is, They which are the children of the flesh...