Search results

I previously posted verses from the Tanakh that show that the promised child would have the title mighty God and everlasting Father. This is an issue that has had its critics since the first advent of Yeshua, and people will continue to voice divers opinions until the end, or their end. At...

The 'can be used' in your above statement would indicate that the word can be also be used differently. In the Bible it is written that man and a woman become one (echad) flesh. The Jewish sage Maimonides (the Rambam) wanted to change the reading of the Shema in reaction to Christianity and...

it's still the same resurrection, the same singular event in John 5:28-29. Jesus uses the word 'HOUR' to describe the event. no matter how much time you choose to say that refers to, it certainly does not refer to a THOUSAND YEARS. in that HOUR they will come forth, those who've done good to...

no. they're not. they are no more separate and distinct events than Christ's return and the physical world being destroyed with fire on the very same Last Day. rightly dividing the word is not Biblically defined as butchering the scriptures. Christ says there will be 'A' resurrection, then...

this is one of the interesting "conveniences" of all the various modern translations today: everybody can just choose which Bible version suits their opinions/level of Christian sincerity best - just as the Bible told us there would be many who would gather teachers to tickle their ears and...

That is a good verse as well. The reason I was arguing mainly from the OT is because it shows the concept of a Godhead has its roots in Judaism. The word trinity doesn't appear in any verse in the Bible, so one of the straw man arguments that muslims present is to show them where in the Bible...

The majority of Mormon doctrine that I was taught when I was a member in the 70s is derived from a non canonical funerary eulogy given by Joseph Smith Jr. in Nauvoo, IL in 1844. In conversing with mormons on other forums in the past, such as CARM, Nothing has changed to any great degree with...

No. Most of mormon doctrine comes from a funerary eulogy given by Joseph Smith Jr while residing in Nauvoo, IL, in 1844, less than two months before he was murdered by a mob in Carthage, IL. It is called the King Follett Discourse. The BoM has little Mormon doctrine in it and has passages...

There are at least 100 or more break off groups, which even started before Josephs murder in 1844. Strang was one of the members that claimed that the leadership had passed down to him, and some followed.

where do you find God promising Abraham a Kingdom?? you're combining two, or more, Biblical teachings into one that doesn't exist.

well, He did NOT say that ... at all. "For I say unto you, Among those that are born of women there is not a greater prophet than John the Baptist: but he that is least in the kingdom of God is greater than he." Luke 7:28 if that's what your entire post rested upon, ... now what? crazy...

thanks for posting that Ex. 34:5, BJ. I had forgotten all about that significant event. that is hugely important to specific debates. I made a note of it for future fodder.

so I asked Moses and he said "Read what I wrote in Exodus 20." so I did and it reads as follows: "And God spake all these words, saying, I am the Lord thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. Thou shalt have no other gods before me. (and the rest...

okay .... so that's when Christians were supposed to have cast the 10 Commandments aside then? as the Bible shows, that's not what happened. your response?

and we sacrifice ourselves by giving up all sin, and our old man - our old ways, and obeying the Commandments of God just as Jesus did.

so here's how disjointed your message is: you say in one post that God has provided the way to righteousness. in the next you say nobody is righteous. when asked what way God provided for us to attain righteousness, you only answer the Cross of Christ. neither the Cross of Christ, nor His...

I don't say any of those things and I still say the Bible speaks of righteous men throughout. it still amazes me how many preachers like yourself teach doctrines that are found nowhere in scripture. the Truth is taking a very strong hold in the world these days, rapidly gaining ground, and...

God spoke the 10 Commandments aloud to His beloved. Jesus reiterated them, teaching them and obeying them and His followers obeyed them after His death on that Cross - including Paul. Acts 21:24 what you teach is not supported by scripture.

well, that entire post = useless. because in Acts 21:24 Paul is referred to by the elders as a regular "Keeper of the Law". that blows a majority of all that you teach here out of the proverbial water.

that's pretty silly. was Jesus "IN" the OT? were His disciples "IN" the OT? don't the commonly taught NT "RULES" supposedly begin at the moment of Christ's death? then why did His closest followers obey the OT Laws that night, and for 300 years after? looks like you got some 'splainin' to...