Search results

Yes. I never murdered anyone ... so that was one "commandment of God" that I kept. However, I was an atheist, so "obeying god (the invisible unicorn)" never entered my mind as a motivation. In addition, I hated a great many people, so as Jesus later explained, I am still "guilty of murder in...

People that say crazy things like this would probably be shocked at how little the two manuscripts differ from one another. (FYI: Absolutely NO biblical doctrines are impacted.) So list 3 verses impacted by the TR vs MGNT manuscript traditions and we will examine them in detail. Here is a...

Objection ... asked and answered:

The KJV. :Laughingoutloud:;)

You win. My facts are powerless before your determined ignorance. You are able to spout nonsense faster than I can correct you with the truth.

Since we are asking MY OPINION, I favor OLDER Copies above NEWER copies rather than "majority" (greatest number) of copies. Here is my logic. Suppose I wanted to recreate the original first printing of "Hop On Pop" by Dr Seuss by going to every public library in my state and checking out every...

Here is what I said about the Autographs ... ... and I stand by that statement.

Then why did you ask me if I had read them?

... more than a bit like OT Israel, is it not. :no reply:

:rolleyes: Have you seen the autographs to compare the KJV to? [I have seen manuscripts that predate the Textus Recepticus to compare it to and determine that the TR has errors introduced by copyists which were carried over into the KJV that was translated in part from the TR into English ...

Peter had your number and warned us about teaching like that: 2 Peter 2:1 [KJV] But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves...

No, I teach sinners to place their trust in an error-free Savior. The Bible is just a book about Him. Which bible is “error free”?

MGNT is closest to the Autographs, and the autographs are the pure word of God. (Although Jesus is the Word of God and can be found in any of the translations that I listed … or, absent ‘eyes to see’ courtesy of the Holy Sprit, none of the translations).

Some people believe things that are simply not true.

:rolleyes: 1796 KJV 1833 WEB 1841 Thayer’s Greek-English Lexicon 1867 DBY 1881 RSV 1890 Strong’s Definitions 1901 ASV 1960 NASB 1973 NIV 1982 NKJV 1996 NET 1996 NLT 2001 ESV 2017 CSB 2020 NASB20 2021 LSB

Blue Letter Bible (dot) org ”In a multitude of counselors, there is wisdom.” [I prefer to read multiple translations to compare them and then go to the “Interlinear” and the ”Dictionaries” and “Lexicons” when there are significant differences to see for myself WHY there are significant...

Not really. It ignores the fact that the Septuagint OT differs from the Hebrew OT so the KJV based on the Greek OT is different from the OT found in the Dead Sea Scrolls and other ancient Hebrew copies. He is using an English translation that has harmonized passages by changing the original...

The AUTOGRAPHS do not exist any more. Copies using Koine Greek exist. Lexicons and Grammar texts in Koine Greek exist. Bibles created from the 99% of the manuscript words that agree (in Koine Greek) with footnotes noting the alternatives exist. You do know that the majority of manuscript...

On the other hand, almost NOBODY has ever read the 1611 version. If they saw it, they would see how difficult the FONT used is to read and how DIFFERENT the basic shapes of even the letters are (not to mention the spelling). However most of the problems with the First Edition (1611) were...

If you don’t want to change the Bible, then learn archaic Greek. If you are not reading the original Greek, then the Bible HAS been changed. The KJV was neither the first nor the most recent translation into English … it is just the official version of the Anglican Church and one of the most...