Search results

Sorry, I trust the KJV translators. Some of them actually knew the original languages. You do not know them, dear sir.

And this is why this conversation with you is not going to continue. You have assumed something wrong about what I believe (when I stated no such thing). I did not say 2 Timothy 3:16-17 is referring to making money.

Modern scholars can make the same claim but they could not order a pizza in Greek. In addition, the expert in Greek I mentioned to you is aware of the two grammatical issues involved in regard to the Comma (1 John 5:7), which agrees with others in history who knew Greek and stated the same...

Catholics use the Bible that does not make the Bible bad. This is the same argument you are making with the Trinity. There are many reasons why we believe the Bible and the Trinity that it teaches is true. Check out my 4 page PDF here on a Defense of the Comma. Note: Simply click on the...

Read 2 Timothy 3:16-17. All Scripture is profitable for the man of God. There is also no verse or passage that states specifically that 2 Timothy 2:15 is exclusively to Pastors, elders, and teachers. That is you saying that. Yes, it was written to Timothy but all Scripture is profitable for...

So you don’t even know? Is there anything in history that shows the hand of God upon these manuscripts?

This ministry is in favor of the Critical Text and not the Textus Receptus. They obviously have a bias. Why? Because folks like the idea of being liberal with the text. They like the idea of a shape shifter Bible that they can twist at times. No thank you. I am not a novice to this...

Nowhere did I state that the Bible is not God’s Word. I disagreed with the article on the grounds that they favor the Majority Text, which is not a settled text. The Byzantine manuscripts are generally in agreement with the KJV but they are not our final word of authority because they never...

It needs to be stated that Peter Ruckman, Gail Riplinger, and Steve Anderson are not KJV-only folk I would recommend in reading. There are many problems with these three individuals. Dr. Gene Kim has a few good KJV videos, but I would also caution very strongly against him, as well. He also...

I am also not KJV-only. I am Core KJV. The KJV is my core foundational text but that does not mean I do not use dictionaries or Modern Translations in helping to understand the archaic language in the KJV better. However, I am not looking to re-write the KJV and or claim it has errors in it...

I would highly advice in watching Nick Sayers YouTube Channel called Revolution. It is very informative. He really goes overboard in doing his homework that others are too lazy to do.

There is no Majority Text. James Snapp Jr. has a position that is flawed because the church never used his exact preferred text through history. To say that the Bible is being discovered by one lone scholar is pretty silly. God would obviously provide His Word that would be perfect for His...

What manuscripts are referring to that have been found post 1850? Are you referring to Vaticanus and Sinaiticus?

This is silly. Just because Paul wrote to Timothy who was in a pastoral role does not mean it was written only to pastors, teachers, and elders alone. Nothing in the context of these letters suggests that it is only for pastors, teachers, and elders. 1. Joshua 1:8 "This book of the law...

Arianism is actually more problematic than you imagine. There are references in history from many different sources that state that they destroyed the original Scriptures and replaced it with their own corrupt versions. Some other Arians did have the uncorrupted Scriptures that contained the...

I have used Modern Bibles. In fact, I still use them to help update the archaic wording in the KJV at times. But I am not looking to explain away the English in the KJV because I see it as the perfect Word of God for today. Anyway, you are incorrect on the Trinity verses. There are only...

The differences between the Beza 1598 Textus Receptus NT Greek (used for the KJV) and the Alexandrian manuscripts like Vaticanus and Sinaiticus (Modern Versions past 1881) is subtly different but those small differences doctrinally are serious. Most do not care and they are not much into the...

You are missing the point. They lied to the reader. Dr. Arthur Farstad conceived of the NKJV translation project and he was the chief editor on it. In Arthur’s book, The New King James Version: in the Great Tradition, Arthur Farstad, who served as executive editor of the New King James...

2 Timothy 2:15 “Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.” John 12:48 ”He that rejecteth me, and receiveth not my words, hath one that judgeth him: the word that I have spoken, the same shall judge him in the last...

Actually, the Modern Bibles came about later and there is no history of the church using it. While the Westcott and Hort Revised Version did not come out until 1881, the Modern Bibles did not become really popular until the 1970s, and 80s. So the Modern Bible Advocates are the new kids on the...