Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. ScottA

    Is the BIBLE a work of CONFUSION?

    This measure--confusion of all language--(and "blindness in part" Romans 11:25) allows for equal opportunity to all generations. In this way, we all stand before God and either gravitate toward Him...or destruction, by our own freewill. Many are called, but few are chosen.
  2. ScottA

    "Is excessive interpretation the root cause of differences in understanding and doctrinal divisions in the Bible?"

    And yet, it should be understood--all have fallen short, leaving no one group fully inline with God and the scriptures.
  3. ScottA

    "Is excessive interpretation the root cause of differences in understanding and doctrinal divisions in the Bible?"

    Oh, yes, certainly it is. But there is to be a final chapter, a final finishing revelation already recorded, and yet not revealed until the time of the end--as it is written. This is that time.
  4. ScottA

    THE CHURCH IS NOT THE BRIDE OF CHRIST

    The passages here regarding the marriage, the bride, and the servants, are given in translation which does not translate well on a timeline. Which has the effect of making it appear that the servants are not the bride, but this is not so. Just as it is correct to say we "were" crucified with...
  5. ScottA

    Is the BIBLE a work of CONFUSION?

    Yes, my own salvation/born again experience was without a Bible. But a week later I just happened to be (:wink: wink, wink) staying in my brother's spare room, and was drawn to a Bible on the shelf--which I then read from cover to cover over the following week. All things are possible with God!
  6. ScottA

    Is the BIBLE a work of CONFUSION?

    If "all language" were not still confused, it would be evident by us all translating and understanding the scriptures the same way. But on the contrary, "all language" still being confused is evidenced by the lack thereof.
  7. ScottA

    Is the BIBLE a work of CONFUSION?

    Yes, "his written word" is finished. That is, except for the parts that were "sealed" and "restrained", and only to be finished with "the mystery of God as He declared to His servants the prophets" before the sounding of the seventh angel.
  8. ScottA

    Is the BIBLE a work of CONFUSION?

    My intention in expressing the difference between the spoken and written word, and the spiritual word (both being from God), is that we take care not to set a limit on God and attribute the greatest communication from God as being scripture or language--which He has confused (evidenced by our...
  9. ScottA

    Is the BIBLE a work of CONFUSION?

    Another way to put it, is: The spoken or written word is to mankind (flesh and blood), as the spirit is to God.
  10. ScottA

    Is the BIBLE a work of CONFUSION?

    What the world experiences is not revenge from God, but Judgement, Justice, Grace and Blessing.
  11. ScottA

    Is the BIBLE a work of CONFUSION?

    No, sorry for the misunderstanding. The Bible (scripture) is true. It is just not the finished work of God. The natural comes first and then the spiritual. Which is to say, the spoken and written words of scripture is to the natural and this world, while the spirit is to God and the kingdom...
  12. ScottA

    Is the BIBLE a work of CONFUSION?

    In a word--yes! God confused "all language" a the Tower of Babel, even "all" of scripture. Meaning, that even the scriptures are not the end-all source of truth. Which is why we debate and interpret it all in so many ways. Please allow me to explain: One word under confusion does not explain...
  13. ScottA

    I am God

    If you maintain your insistence that [confused] language, whether spoken or written, is the final say--you will remain in confusion. One word under confusion does not explain another under confusion. That process is no more profitable than the flesh. Do you understand that those are the terms...
  14. ScottA

    I am God

    Language is confused--not the end all of interpretation. But even in the language of the scriptures--if they are all reconciled--Jesus is God according to John yes, but also prophesied by name by Isaiah: Isa 9:6 For unto us a child H3206 is born, H3205 unto us a son H1121 is given: H5414 and...
  15. ScottA

    If you’re a Christian and you support the modern geopolitical state of Israel, you deny that Christ is the Messiah. It's that simple.

    TWO THINGS HERE ARE IN PLAY: 1. The bloodline of Israel is not the problem. They are a people who were not a people, whom God has made a light unto all nations and people. For which God has made certain promises and provisions, including many trials and a blindness after the "finish" like unto...
  16. ScottA

    The Bible is Father-Centric not Christo-Centric

    No, but you will see. It is enough.
  17. ScottA

    The Bible is Father-Centric not Christo-Centric

    Again, you reject that there is "A time for every purpose under heaven." And your purpose--as it is written, is greatly flawed. How is it that you do not know that during those days Christ had "somewhat against" 5 out of 7 churches; and that as "there were also false prophets among the people...
  18. ScottA

    The Bible is Father-Centric not Christo-Centric

    That sounds nice, but you have rejected the word of God which does not say that the best of Christian service was according to those of the 1st century, but that there is "A time for every purpose under heaven." So be it. So shall it be written of you.
  19. ScottA

    Jesus and Peter taught that the earth will be destroyed unexpectedly on the day Jesus returns just as the earth was destroyed in Noah's day

    Yes, kinda like "unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you have no life in you", and "you must be born again." In which case you would do well to consider the error of the Priests and the Pharisees, and their ideas on what was literal and straightforward.